Skip to content


Re Form - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: re form Page 1 of about 44 results (0.030 seconds)
Jul 10 2014 (HC)

Forme Communications Vs. Dilip Kumar Aggarwal

Court: Delhi

visually similar and phonetically identical to trademark Forme with logo registered by the Plaintiff Company.17. Further, on a search carried out in 2011. Plaintiff has also established that the trade mark Forme used for mobile phones is highly distinctive and is identified

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2002 (TRI)

Sundstrand Forms Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Meerut-ii

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2002)LC470Tri(Delhi)

contrary to this has been brought on record by the Revenue. Accordingly, we hold that the impugned product is not classifiable exceeding 36 cm or if in rectangular or square sheet form, its one side should exceed 36 cm in unfolded state),

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 12 2004 (HC)

Zilt Forms Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. West Bengal State Electricity Board ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2004(4)CHN49

justify the said action. The reasons put forward by the respondents in its affidavit-in-opposition for the delay in providing supply cannot The petitioners having deposited the sum and complied with the formalities, as directed by the Board was entitled to supply of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 09 1998 (TRI)

Rose Business Forms Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(106)ELT320TriDel

Notification No. 43/86, dated 10-2-1986 as amended, specified no condition regarding end use of articles of stationery /manifold business forms as same.1.10. Both the products viz. printed continuous stationery (manifold business forms) and rulled papers are covered by sub-heading 4820.00 and, therefore,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 1995 (HC)

Business Forms Ltd. and Ashoka Agencies

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1996Cal153,[1999]95CompCas172(Cal)

the goods returned a balance sum of Rs. 17,38,647.95 p. remained due and payable on account of the principal amount due are concerned, if the company supplies the Sales Tax Declaration Forms within a period of one month from today then the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 29 1997 (TRI)

Rose Business Forms Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)(98)ELT260TriDel

accepted. The Division Bench of the High Court has rightly rejected the contention on the following reasoning: "In our view, it with Directorate of Industries, Solapur for the manufacture of computer form in two parts and three parts, telex rolled papers and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1984 (HC)

Business Forms Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Karnataka, B ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1985(5)ECC118; 1992(61)ELT429(Kar); [1985]59STC87(Kar)

the Act, reversed the orders of the Deputy Commissioner and restored that of the assessing authority. 4. The principal question that Mr. Shukla also produced before us for perusal the printed forms and punch-cards, which are made to order and supplied by

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 10 1998 (HC)

Executive Club Formed by Lalitha Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., Vijayawada an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(5)ALD126; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)569; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)207; 1999CriLJ35

club was making a profit or gain so as to render the club into a common gambling house. Similarly, a late for such gaming; (ii) in the case of any other form of gaming, any house, room tent, enclosure, vehicle vessel or

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 24 2013 (HC)

Agreenco Fibre Form (P) Ltd. Vs. the Asst.Provident Fund Commissioner

Court: Kerala

JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved by the proceedings initiated for recovery of an amount of Rs.6,02,486/-, which has been allegedly determined WP(C).No. 23005 of 2013 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- AGREENCO FIBRE FORM (P) LTD. P B NO3662 BALIAPATAM, KANNUR-670010 KERALA STATE ,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 17 2019 (HC)

Star Forms vs.directorate of Education, Govt. of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

the court can say: the decision is such that no responsible authority acting reasonably and in accordance with relevant law could 09.2019 + W.P.(C) 10061/2019 & CM APPL. Nos. 41603-04/2019 STAR FORMS Through : Mr. Annirudh Sharma & Ms.Shriya ........ Petitioner Chanda,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //