Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: re entry permit Court: gujarat Page 14 of about 5,912 results (0.018 seconds)

May 10 2005 (HC)

Sonali Dyeing and Printing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2008[12]STR524; [2009]20STT441

..... similarly, the respondent authorities shall permit the petitioner to reverse the entry regarding outstanding modvat credit within the aforesaid time frame. ..... therefore, without entering into the controversy as to whether payment was voluntary or otherwise, in absence of any statutory backing, the funds recovered by the respondent authorities by way of various cheques collected by them, cannot be permitted to be retained and are required to be refunded forthwith. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2011 (HC)

Dilip J Shah. Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Commission and ors.

Court : Gujarat

..... the pertinent aspect is that as per the said scheme, the age relaxation is permitted to be considered on merits of the case, but subject to the age within the limit on the date of having service of the ongc on service contract. ..... learned counsel submitted that if such is permitted, it would result into discrimination to the petitioners, which the ld. ..... who was under-aged, has also been appointed in service of the ongc; whereas the cases of the petitioners are not accepted for regular appointment on the ground that they were age barred at the entry point. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 1992 (HC)

Gandhinagar Bottling Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1995(75)ELT54(Guj); (1992)2GLR1339

..... 223 of 1987 to get the exemption of excise duty by backdoor entry of manufacturing the goods through other manufacturers. ..... a manufacturer with a brand name or a trade name who is not eligible for grant of exemption under the notification is not permitted by the notification no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 2004 (HC)

Tyrreli Leth Lodge Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2004Guj340; (2004)3GLR2686

..... said rule 7 reads as under :'purchase of certificates on behalf of others : a person or body specified in column i of the table below may purchase certificate(s) on behalf of persons specified against his or its name in the corresponding entry in column ii of the said table : provided that the persons specified in the said column ii are eligible under these rules to purchase certificates. t a b l e.---------------------------------------------------------ii---------------------------------------------------------i. ..... similarly, rule 7 of the rules 1981, permits purchase of national savings certificates on behalf of others. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2009 (HC)

Vala Manish Vaghabhai and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2278

..... that the respondent- authorities are required to initiate action only within a reasonable period, and having failed to do so, cannot now be permitted to refer to and rely upon the notification of 1977 for the purposes of divesting the possession of lands in question held by the petitioners. ..... the purpose for which the statute is enacted has to be borne in mind while considering as to whether the authority can be permitted to initiate action. ..... according to the petitioners, entry nos. ..... 4, deputy conservator of forests gir, (east) division as well as entry no. ..... however, entry no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1980 (HC)

Vithaldas H. Dhanjibhai Bardanwala Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Guj ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1981)21CTR(Guj)190; [1981]130ITR95(Guj)

..... . it is, therefore, clear that the division bench of bombay high court in the aforesaid case clearly took the view that once the assessee has posted entries in the profit and loss account showing a particular debt to have become bad and once corresponding entries are posted in suspense account, that would be enough compliance with the provisions of the statutory requirement for writing off as irrecoverable the concerned debt in the books of ..... . on the materials placed before him, it is always open to the income-tax officer to come to the conclusion that the fact that the assess has not chosen to post an entry consistent with the circumstances that no part of the debt due to him in the year of account has become bad or doubtful and, therefore, irrecoverable, and on that account to disallow the claim which may be made ..... but the short question which has been posed for our consideration in the present proceeding is this : in the absence of such detailed entries, in the ordinary mercantile system of book-keeping, where the assessee follows a single entry system of book-keeping, if he has posted relevant entries in his books of account to indicate in no uncertain terms that the concerned bad debt is written off by him as irrecoverable, can it be said that he has not complied with ..... . 540) : 'but in advancing this contention what is that section 10 (2) (xi) does not merely permit an assessee to claim relief in respect of a bad debt but it also gives him right to claim relief in case of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2011 (HC)

Arcoy Biorefinery Pvt.Ltd and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

1. this applicant has filed this application under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 is filed by the applicants with the following main prayer :- "[b] your lordship may be pleased to quash and set aside criminal complaint being criminal case no.1743 of 2010 filed before the additional chief judicial magistrate, anand for the offences punishable under section 138 of the negotiable instrument act at annexure-"a" to the application".2. this court while issuing notice on 25.06.2010 granted ad-interim relief in terms of para 7(b) of the application.3. learned counsel for the parties submit that thereafter, the parties have settled their dispute and entered into memorandum of understanding dated 24.01.2011. this court noticed the alleged dispute about payment of outstanding dues vis-a-vis interpretion of terms of agreement. the said memorandum of understanding reads as under:"this memorandum of understanding is entered into this 24^th day of january, 2011 at ahmedabad between m/s.gmm pfaudler ltd. [hereinafter referred to s "gmm") and m/s. arcoy biorefinery pvt. ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "arcoy");whereas arcoy had placed an order with gmm for the latter supplying to it. rotary ball digesters per its purchase order no.abpl/panoli/machi/004/08-09 date3d 19.12.2008;and whereas gmm supplied the goods to arcoy but disputes arose between the parties regarding the delay and suitability of some parts of the machines supplied by gmm;and whereas a cheque for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2011 (HC)

Lutim Pharma Pvt.Ltd.-thro and ors. Vs. Meteoric Exim Pvt.Ltd.- Thro a ...

Court : Gujarat

1. the applicants have filed this application under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings and the private criminal complaint case no.1304 of 2010 pending before the court of metropolitan magistrate, court no.13, ahmedabad.2. on 23.12.2010, a co-ordinate bench of this court while issuing rule and granting ad-interim relief, passed the following order:1. mr.meena, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that the amount involved in the present matter is approximately rs.1 lac (rupees one lac only) and to show the bonafide event the petitioners are ready and willing to deposit the said amount with the registry of this court without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners.2. though served nobody appears on behalf of the respondent no.1.3. in the facts and circumstances of the case, rule, returnable on 17/1/2011. ad-interim relief granted earlier is directed to be continued till final disposal of the present petition, on condition that the petitioners shall deposit a sum of rs.1 lac (rupees one lac only) with the registry of this court on or before 11/1/2011. however the deposit of the aforesaid amount by the petitioners shall be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners."3. thereafter, the parties have settled the dispute and filed joint settlement purshish in the following terms:"3.1 that the petitioner herein shall pay an amount of rupees 1,40,000 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2008 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mahendra C. Shah

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)215CTR(Guj)493; [2008]299ITR305(Guj)

..... when the statement is being recorded by the authorized officer it is incumbent upon the authorized officer to explain the provisions of explanation 5 in entirety to the assessee concerned and the authorized officer cannot stop short at a particular stage so as to permit the revenue to take advantage of such a lapse in the statement. ..... 1 relevant entry in the books of account or disclosure before the competent authority, and in relation to exception no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2008 (HC)

Sahitya Mudranalaya and 10 ors. Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission a ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)216CTR(Guj)174; [2009]312ITR115(Guj)

..... of the provisions mentioned in the said sub-section when the amount on which interest was payable either under sub-section (1) or sub-section (3) is varied by way of increase or reduction, but the said provision does not permit levy for the first time and, therefore, the commission cannot derive any powers to levy interest in absence of stipulated conditions under sub-section (1) of section 234b of the act being satisfied. ..... on 18.10.1991 the commission permitted the applications moved by the petitioners to be proceeded with in exercise of powers under section 245d(1) of the act. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //