Skip to content


Re Employment - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: re employment Page 1 of about 468 results (0.040 seconds)
Mar 22 2002 (HC)

Employers in Relation to the Management of Flaritand Colliery of Bccl ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1351; [2002(94)FLR644]; (2002)IIILLJ175Jhar

an industrial dispute brought before it by any contract labourIn regard to conditions of service, the industrial adjudicator will have to the appropriate Government under Sub-section (1) of Section 10, prohibiting employment of contract labour, in any process, operation or other work

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 18 2003 (HC)

Employers in Relation to the Management of Nirsa Area of Eastern Coalf ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1602; [2003(3)JCR189(Jhr)]

ordered that if the Respondents restart the Colliery, they will recruit the workmen to the extent of their requirement. Without taking of Badjna Colliery of M/s. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. in denying employment to Shri Basudeo Bhuiyan and 682 others shown in the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 02 2003 (HC)

Employers in Relation to the Management of Bhuli Township Administrati ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2003(3)BLJR2058; [2003(4)JCR34(Jhr)]; (2004)ILLJ554Jhar

of the judgment of learned Single Judge, whereby direction to regularize them was held to be unjustified.8. Learned counsel for the Labour Union, reported in (1997) 9 SCC 377, if the employment was of perennial nature, contract system stands abolished and therefore

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 1973 (SC)

Workmen of Calcutta Dock Labour Board and anr. Vs. Employers in Relati ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC2251; [1973(26)FLR444]; (1973)IILLJ254SC; (1974)3SCC216; 1973(1)SLJ1044(SC)

wages of monthly workers include an element of wages in respect of the weekly days of rest? If not, to what the Act) or under the Calcutta Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Scheme, 1956 and the other scheme of 1957 and therefore

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 09 1919 (FN)

Arizona Employers' Liability Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

employment, to enter into an agreement not to become or remain a member of a labor organization was declared in conflict an employee who is injured in the course of his employment has open to him three avenues of redress, any one

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 2003 (HC)

Employer in Relation to the Management of Central Mine Planning and De ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2003(3)JCR647(Jhr)]

out of the casual employees and thereby solve the manpower requirements which became necessary upon extension of the project by six appointed as casuals from the list sponsored by the local Employment Exchange, two were appointed on the basis of earlier experience

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Karnataka Employers Association Vs. The Secretary

Court: Karnataka

is filed by Akhila Karnataka Federation of Petroleum Traders which represents the Petrol and Diesel Oil Pumps Industries. The appellant had rates of wages payable to the employees, employed in any employments specified in Part-I or Part-II of the Schedule to the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Karnataka Employers Association Vs. The Secretary Labour Department

Court: Karnataka

ABOUT68YEARS22 SHANTI IRON & STEEL NO.690, UDYAMBAG INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BELGAUM-590008 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER - 109 - SRI SANTHOSH K PORWAL by the said notifications in respect of various categories of employments. Apart from that, there were three final notifications issued under

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 06 1908 (FN)

Employers' Liability Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

unsoundness of the contention that, because the act regulates the relation of master and servant, it is unconstitutional because under no in case he incurred injuries in the course of his employment; the statute forbids such a contract. Thus, four doctrines of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1939 (FN)

Pacific Employers Ins. Co. Vs. Industrial Accident Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

the California Commission, in applying the California Act and in refusing to recognize the Massachusetts statute as a defense, had denied injuries received by his employees in the course of their employment without regard to negligence and for the costs of medical

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //