Rationally - Judgment Search Results

Commr. of C. Ex., Hyderabad Vs. Associated Cement Companies Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2005(180)ELT3(SC)

order1 this review petition has been filed by the commissioner of central excise seeking review of the order dated 28th...

Punjab Urban Development Authority and ors. Vs. Dashmesh Educational S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2005)139PLR238

surya kant j 1 this judgment will dispose of regular second appeal nos 4328 and 4345 of 2002 as not...

Satyendra Kumar Tripathi and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and anr. Etc.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR2005All147

..... the classification granting preference to particular castes is an absolutely unreasonable classification having no rational nexus with the objects sought to be achieved under the 1957 act this according ..... the classification granting preference to particular castes is an absolutely unreasonable classification having no rational nexus with the objects sought to be achieved under the 1957 act this .....

industrial Development Corporation of Orissa Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 98(2004)CLT363; [2004]268ITR130(Orissa)

a k patnaik j 1 this is an appeal under section 260a of the income tax act 1961 in short...

In Re: Hitachi Home and Life

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

in concert with hitachi and is fully covered by the rationale in the above referred case decided by the bombay high

Shri T.O. Aleyas, Shri Bobby Vs. St. Mary'S Hotels Private Limited

Court: Company Law Board CLB

1 the petition in c p 30 2003 first petition is filed by the petitioners collectively holding more than 10...

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., through Its Branch Manager Vs. the C ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: II(2005)ACC272; 2006ACJ2832

orderv eswaraiah j 1 all these writ petitions are filed by the petitioner new india assurance company limited to issue...

A (Fc) and Others (Fc) (Appellants) Vs. Secretary of State for the Hom ...

Court: House of Lords

..... 2000 already contained wide ranging provisions which gave adequate protection under the sub heading rational connexion they then turned in paras 46 53 to the appellants various arguments ..... differ from most of your lordships as to whether the derogating measures are proportionate rational and non discriminatory or are in the alternative disproportionate irrational and offensively discriminatory in .....

Sukumar Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2004(4)CHN629

..... is allowed by the director or the deputy controller of rationing or the rationing officer to manage the affairs of the shop through ..... is clear that the director or the deputy director of rationing or the rationing officer that is the authorities may allow an agent ..... to be a dealer similarly under clause 2 3 of the rationing order the definition of appointed establishment proprietor included any other .....

Vieth Vs. Jubelirer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and ad hoc law pronounced by the courts must be principled rational and based upon reasoned distinctions over the dissent of three ..... where they are so highly irregular on their face that they rationally cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to ..... by alleging that the legislation though race neutral on its face rationally cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to separate .....