Rationalize - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: rationalize Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 516 results (0.006 seconds)

Nov 27 2001 (FN)

Chickasaw Nation Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-27-2001

chickasaw nation v united states 534 u s 84 2001 october term 2001 syllabus chickasaw nation v united states certiorari...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 06 2001 (HC)

E.i.H. Limited Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-06-2001

Reported in: AIR2001Raj236; 2001(4)WLN99

ordermathur j 1 this wril petition under article 226 of the constitution of india by e i h limited is...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 11 2001 (HC)

K. Venkateswara Rao Vs. Phoenix Share and Stockbrokers (P.) Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-11-2001

Reported in: [2003]115CompCas818(Bom)

r j kochar j 1 the petitioner is one of the four directors of the respondent company he has prayed...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2001 (HC)

Ved Parkash Nagori Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-29-2001

Reported in: [2001]251ITR161(P& H)

..... could be formed by the income tax officer and further whether that material had any rational connection or a live link for the formation of the requisitebelief it would be immaterial .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 09 2001 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vallabhdas Vithaldas and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Nov-09-2001

Reported in: [2002]253ITR543(Guj)

m s shah j 1 in both these references under section 256 1 of the income tax act 1961 hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 06 2001 (TRI)

Dinesh Gandhi and Bakula Gandhi Vs. Bayer Diagnostics India Ltd.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Aug-06-2001

Reported in: (2002)111CompCas547

1 this is a petition filed under section 111a of the companies act 1956 the act by the petitioners mr...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 21 2001 (FN)

United States Vs. Hatter

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-21-2001

at 39 40 reply brief for united states 16 this rationale however is the government s and not necessarily that of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 08 2001 (HC)

Tekchand and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-08-2001

Reported in: (2001)IILLJ1700P& H

..... it must be mentioned that the conditions laid down by the government should have a rational relationship with the requirements of the post the imperative need to select and appoint the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 2001 (HC)