Ratify - Judgment Search Results

ishvar Dadu Patil Vs. Gajabai Babaji Patil

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR782

norman macleod kt c j 1 i have had the privilege of reading the very exhaustive judgments of my hindu...

Linga Iyer Alias Ramalinga Iyer Vs. Lakshmanan Chettiar and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 94Ind.Cas.123

odgers j 1 this is an appeal from the decree of the subordinate judge of dindigul confirming in part the...

Linga Aiyar Alias Ramalinga Aiyar Vs. Lakshumanan Chettiar and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1926Mad687; (1926)50MLJ387

1 this is an appeal from the decree of the subordinate judge of dindigul confirming in part the decree of...

Sethu Konar Vs. Ramaswami Konar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1926Mad484; 94Ind.Cas.526; (1926)50MLJ205

spencer j 1 o s no 320 of 1918 was a suit brought by the 1st respondent upon a mortgage...

Vuppulury Somasundaram Vs. Bhimisetti Kondayya

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1926Mad12; (1925)49MLJ401

venkatasubba rao j 1 this is a letters patent appeal from the judgment of krishnan j i shall briefly state...

indra NaraIn Manna and ors. Vs. Srimati Sarbasona Dasi

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 87Ind.Cas.930

suhrawardy j 1 these two groups of appeals arise out of rent suits brought by the plaintiff in respect of...

B. Kishen Prasad and anr. Vs. Kunj Behari Lal

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1926All278

mukerji j 1 this is a decree holder s appeal on the 29th of may 1924 the suit out of...

Madhavrao Raste Vs. Imam Bapu Sherkar

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR433; 94Ind.Cas.737

fawcett j 1 these appeals arise out of three suits nos 101 102 and 103 of 1920 they were tried...

Askaran Choutmal Vs. E.i. Ry. and Co.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1925Cal696

..... contrary that the defendant company neither expressly authorised nor subsequently ratified the said agreement if it had done so the question ..... upon the client if it is expressly authorised or subsequently ratified by the client or by his agent authorised in that ..... and as the defendant company which neither expressly authorised nor ratified the arrangement refused to give its consent to the terms .....

Druggan Vs. Anderson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... which is not that the amendment shall go into operation a year after it is ratified but that the acts against which it is directed are prohibited after that time although ..... was no amendment until january 16 1920 although one had been ratified a year before the moment that the amendment was ratified it became effective as a law the operation of its .....