Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rajiv gandhi university act 2006 section 5 object of the university Page 99 of about 1,384 results (0.131 seconds)

Verizon Communications Singapore Pte Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer of In ...

Court : Chennai

..... ltd., (formerly mci worldcom asia pte ltd.) c/o s.r.batliboi & co. 6th & 7th floor, a block (module 601, 701-702) no.4, rajiv gandhi salai, taramani, chennai 600 113. .... appellant in t.c.(a)no.230/2012 vs. the income tax officer international taxation i, aayakar bhawan, no.121, nungambakkam high ..... taxation avoidance agreement is entitled to seek the benefits thereunder, even if the provisions of the double taxation avoidance agreement are inconsistent with those of the act.24. touching on the principles adopted for interpretation of treaties, the apex court pointed out ".the interpretation of provisions of an international treaty, including one ..... ............... explanation 2. for the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that ".business connection". shall include any business activity carried out through a person who, acting on behalf of the non-resident, (a)has and habitually exercises in india, an authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the non-resident, unless his activities .....

Smt K M Chikkathayamma Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... taking possession of land being on account of interim orders of court, only payment of interest would arise and that the acquisition would not lapse, was rejected in rajiv chowdharie huf vs. union of india and others, (2015)3 scc541 (v) in a case where physical possession 90% of the land was taken to implement ..... persons.25. the bill seeks to achieve the above objects. the notes on clauses explain the various provisions contained in the bill . preamble: (to the la act, 2013) an act to ensure, in consultation with institutions of local self- government and gram sabhas established under the constitution, a humane, participative, informed and transparent process for land ..... can be placed on the order in the writ petitions for the purpose of deciding the 79 issue with respect to section 24(2) of the la act, 2013 act. except producing three orders passed by the learned single judges, the petitioners have not produced any other legally acceptable material to show that the possession is not .....

Gangadhar Narayan Nayak @ Gangadhar Hiregutti Vs. The State Of Karnata ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women. 1946. as stated in the preamble to the universal declaration of human rights, adopted by the united nations on 10th december 1948, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members ..... made in the statute regarding it being cognizable/non-cognizable. 13 14. the high court, considering all the provisions and also the judgments of this court in the cases of rajiv chaudhary vs. state (nct) of delhi, air2001sc2369and rakesh kumar paul vs. state of assam, (2017) 15 scc67 has answered the reference as under: 21. . thus, ..... free and equal in dignity and rights. they are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. nobody is to be subjected, inter alia, to degrading treatment.48. article 12 of the universal declaration of human rights says that no one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy .....

Mr Dhiraj Jain Vs. The State

Court : Karnataka

..... both accused as well as the prosecution agency. 46.3. the investigation shall continue to be carried out by the cbi but shall be monitored closely by mr. rajiv singh, joint director, cbi. 46.4. the investigation by the cbi shall ensure that all required evidence are gathered by proceeding to make further investigation in order ..... would have done better if it had informed the ambala magistrate and sought his formal permission for the second investigation, we are satisfied that the investigating agency did not act out of any malice. we are also satisfied that there has been no illegality. both the appeals are, therefore, dismissed. kishan lal vs. dharmendra bafna and ..... for on facts, since there was unanimity on part of both parties that investigation was tainted, biased and not fair, though for different reasons, investigating agency directed to act in terms of s. 173(8) director general of police directed to monitor such reinvestigation. h.n.reshbud and inder singh v. state of delhi (1955) 1 .....

Mr. Dhiraj Jain Vs. The State

Court : Karnataka

..... both accused as well as the prosecution agency. 46.3. the investigation shall continue to be carried out by the cbi but shall be monitored closely by mr. rajiv singh, joint director, cbi. 46.4. the investigation by the cbi shall ensure that all required evidence are gathered by proceeding to make further investigation in order ..... would have done better if it had informed the ambala magistrate and sought his formal permission for the second investigation, we are satisfied that the investigating agency did not act out of any malice. we are also satisfied that there has been no illegality. both the appeals are, therefore, dismissed. kishan lal vs. dharmendra bafna and ..... for on facts, since there was unanimity on part of both parties that investigation was tainted, biased and not fair, though for different reasons, investigating agency directed to act in terms of s. 173(8) director general of police directed to monitor such reinvestigation. h.n.reshbud and inder singh v. state of delhi (1955) 1 .....

Sri Chandappa Gowda Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation

Court : Karnataka

..... both accused as well as the prosecution agency. 46.3. the investigation shall continue to be carried out by the cbi but shall be monitored closely by mr. rajiv singh, joint director, cbi. 46.4. the investigation by the cbi shall ensure that all required evidence are gathered by proceeding to make further investigation in order ..... would have done better if it had informed the ambala magistrate and sought his formal permission for the second investigation, we are satisfied that the investigating agency did not act out of any malice. we are also satisfied that there has been no illegality. both the appeals are, therefore, dismissed. kishan lal vs. dharmendra bafna and ..... for on facts, since there was unanimity on part of both parties that investigation was tainted, biased and not fair, though for different reasons, investigating agency directed to act in terms of s. 173(8) director general of police directed to monitor such reinvestigation. h.n.reshbud and inder singh v. state of delhi (1955) 1 .....

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in a fair trial could be violative of article 14 of the constitution. elevating the right of fair trial, the court observed:- article 12 of the universal declaration of human rights provides for the right to a fair trial what is enshrined in article 21 of our constitution. therefore, fair trial is the ..... congealed into animal existence without the freshening flow of fair procedure. the meaning of life given by field, j., approved in kharak singh[5]. and maneka gandhi[6]. bears excerption: something more than mere animal existence. the inhibition against its deprivation extends to all those limbs and faculties by which life is enjoyed ..... state legislature involves limitation on legislative powers and, therefore, this requires an authority other than parliament to ascertain whether such limitations are transgressed. judicial review acts as the final arbiter not only to give effect to the distribution of legislative powers between parliament and the state legislatures, it is also necessary to .....

Pramod Arora Vs. Honble Lt. Governor of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... education stage itself.16. in support of the submissions, learned counsel relied on the judgments reported as anamol bhandari (minor) through his father/natural guardian v. delhi technological university, 2012 (131) drj583 and national federation of the blind v. union of india and ors., 156 (2009) dlt446 dlt102(db). contentions of the gnct:17. the gnct ..... state, central, and government aided or funded educational institutions ensure admission in respect of at least 3% of their intake in favour of cwsn. section 26 universalized the rights of cwsn by directing the state to grant them access to free education. this right is special, and not subject to the limited regime under ..... a disability (as defined in 2(i) of the pwd act) of any extent/degree. consequently, the scope of the duty imposed upon the state under section 26 is wider, and owed to a wider category of people. second, whilst section 26(a) is concerned with universal compulsory free education for every disabled child till he or .....

Sebastian K. Antony Kavumbhagom Vs. Manager, St.Albert's College, Erna ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2012(2)KLT133(SN)(C.No.129)

..... committed a serious misconduct but also an offence. you are required to show cause why disciplinary action as contemplated under section 63 of the mahatma gandhi university act 1985 read with part d, chapter 45 of the mahatma gandhi university statues, 1997, should not be taken against you. you are allowed 15 days from the date of the receipt of this communication, to submit your ..... to complete the disciplinary proceedings within the stipulated time. hence the petitioner submitted a representation dated 8.5.2008 to the vice-chancellor of the m.g. university under section 63(3) of the mahatma gandhi university act. the vice chancellor by order dated 22.5.2008 directed the first respondent to reinstate him in service with immediate effect. but the first respondent refused .....

Bhagat Kalicharan Makhijani Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

..... , as an equivalent. for thispurpose, he relied upon the definition of "distance education system" in section 2(e) of indira gandhi national open university act, 1985. but there is nothing to show that annamalai university has treated correspondence course and ous (distance education) course as the same. what is more important is that the appellant ..... regard to the opinion expressed by the experts constituting the selection committee and its recommendation on which the chancellor has acted. see also the decisions in dr. j.p. kulshreshtha and ors. v. chancellor, allahabad university, raj bhavan and ors., [1980] 3 scr 902 at 912 and dalpat abasahed solunke v.b.s. ..... university does not wish to treat correspondence course and distance education course as being the same. that is a matter of .....