Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rajiv gandhi university act 2006 section 5 object of the university Court: mumbai nagpur Page 1 of about 7 results (0.070 seconds)

Sep 12 2011 (HC)

Wainganga Bahu-uddeshiya Vikas Sanstha and ors. Vs. Anil S/O Dewaji Ga ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... to reproduce one such approval letter in respect of appellant-anil gaikwad. to, the principal, wainganga bahu uddeshiya vikas sanstha, rajive gandhi mahavidyalaya, sadak-arjuni, distt. bhandara. subject : approval of the university for the appointment of lecturers in you college 1996-97 ref'nce: your letter no.rgm/sa/148/96 dated7.12.96 ..... cleared lecturers were to get seniority over their net/set uncleared seniors. it is rather doubtful, whether this tribunal under section 59 of the maharashtra universities act, 1994 can condone anything and declare any appointee-employee as permanent or deemed confirmed employee, without such appointment in clear terms with in conformity with ..... the said ground. in my view, the said contention is bereft of any merit. the college tribunal constituted under section 59 of the maharashtra universities act is a tribunal of limited jurisdiction constituted to consider the grievances of the teachers in respect of the matters mentioned in the said section 59. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2012 (HC)

Wainganga Bahu-uddeshiya Vikas and Others Vs. Diwakar S/O Maloji Kambl ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... who had filed appeals before the university and college tribunal; and the orders made by the college tribunal to hold de novo enquiry against them and the order directing reinstatement and payment of backwages were also confirmed. facts: 3. appellant no.1 wainganga bahuuddheshiya vikas sanstha runs rajiv gandhi mahavidyalaya at sadak-arjuni, district gondia ..... all of them by different termination orders which were accordingly issued. all the three employees filed three different appeals before the university and college tribunal under section 59 of the maharashtra universities act, 1984. these appeals were heard and disposed of by the tribunal and were allowed with certain findings against the management ..... and governed by statute 53 read with direction 22 of 2002 issued by the hon'ble vice-chancellor of r.t.m., nagpur university under sec. 14(8) of maharashtra universities act, 1994. thus the respondent no. 1 and all the respondents know and knew that the services of the appellant cannot be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2012 (HC)

Wainganga Bahuuddeshiya Vikas and Others Vs. Diwakar and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... who had filed appeals before the university and college tribunal; and the orders made by the college tribunal to hold de novo enquiry against them and the order directing reinstatement and payment of backwages were also confirmed. facts: 3. appellant no.1 wainganga bahuuddheshiya vikas sanstha runs rajiv gandhi mahavidyalaya at sadak-arjuni, district gondia ..... all of them by different termination orders which were accordingly issued. all the three employees filed three different appeals before the university and college tribunal under section 59 of the maharashtra universities act, 1984. these appeals were heard and disposed of by the tribunal and were allowed with certain findings against the management ..... and governed by statute 53 read with direction 22 of 2002 issued by the hon'ble vice-chancellor of r.t.m., nagpur university under sec. 14(8) of maharashtra universities act, 1994. thus the respondent no. 1 and all the respondents know and knew that the services of the appellant cannot be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2013 (HC)

National Seed Association of India and Others Vs. the State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... , was superseded by the sugar control order, 1966 which allowed the central government to fix a minimum price. (g) at the end of arguments, rajiv sarins case (2011) 8 scc) was cited in support of the states propositions. however, the same articulates the dominant intention test rather than the actual ..... power of authorities to direct producers to sell and distribute the seeds. the enforcement authorities are also provided. iv. the environment (protection) act, 1986, (for short environment act ), this act provides for the protection and improvement of environment and for matters connected therewith. v. rules for manufacture, use, import, export and storage ..... commerce in certain commodities. the term essential commodities is described in the schedule (section 2a) which includes cotton seed. ii. the seeds act, 1966, (for short seeds act ), this act provides for regulating the quality of certain seeds for sale and for matters connected therewith. the term seed includes cotton seeds also. iii. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2012 (HC)

Hitendrasingh S/O Bhupendrasingh and Others Vs. Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... at an earliest occasion and render his decision. accordingly, in exercise of the powers conferred upon the chancellor under section 11(1) of the maharashtra agricultural universities act 1983 (hereinafter referred as the act), the chancellor vide letter dated 28.05.2007 appointed justice shri h.w.dhabe, retired high court judge to conduct detailed enquiry in the matter and submit ..... .m.s.mudhol and another v/s s.d.halegkar and others. (5) (1991) 3 scc 368 - munindra kumar and others v/s rajiv govil and others. (6) (1998) 8 scc 194 - basudeo tiwary v/s sido kanhu university and others. (7) (2008) 8 scc 725 - dev dutt v/s union of india and others. (8) air 1986 sc 180 - ..... m.s.mudhol and another v/s s.d.halegkar and others), (1991) 3 scc 368 (munindra kumar and others v/s rajiv govil and others) and (1998) 8 scc 194 (basudeo tiwary v/s sido kanhu university and others) were either of irregularities, but not so serious as to vitiate the entire selection process process or going to the root .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2012 (HC)

Hitendrasingh S/O Bhupendrasingh and Others Vs. Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... at an earliest occasion and render his decision. accordingly, in exercise of the powers conferred upon the chancellor under section 11(1) of the maharashtra agricultural universities act 1983 (hereinafter referred as the act ), the chancellor vide letter dated 28.05.2007 appointed justice shri h.w.dhabe, retired high court judge to conduct detailed enquiry in the matter and ..... authority of the petitioners. he is much more than an ordinary appointing and disciplinary authority. he is, as set out in section 15 of the said act, the head of the university. 80 we are in agreement with mr.deshpande that if the selection process itself was under scrutiny and that was found to have lost its total sanctity, ..... m.s.mudhol and another v/s s.d.halegkar and others. (5) (1991) 3 scc 368 - munindra kumar and others v/s rajiv govil and others. (6) (1998) 8 scc 194 - basudeo tiwary v/s sido kanhu university and others. (7) (2008) 8 scc 725 - dev dutt v/s union of india and others. (8) air 1986 sc 180 - .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2016 (HC)

Rahul and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Urba ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... , in the words of sir william wade, the powerful engines of authority must be prevented from running amok (see: wade administrative law, 8th edn. p.5, oxford university press). 35. in the case of veerendra kumar dubey v. chief of army staff and ors. (2016) 2 scc 627, the hon'ble apex court has held ..... based. in several judgments of hon'ble apex court, it has been held to be part of articles 14 and 21 pervading them like brooding omnipresence (see: maneka gandhi vs. union of india a.i.r. 1978 sc 597) and striking at non-arbitrariness (ramana dayaram shetty vs. the international airport authority of india and others ..... framed by the state government, the municipal council would be under an obligation to respect the guidelines issued by an administrative authority appointed under the provisions of the act, 1965 regulating the exercise of contractural powers and providing a safeguard against their arbitrary exercise by the councillors. 19. learned special counsel further submits that the impugned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2016 (HC)

M/s. Nagpur Distillers Private Limited and Another Vs. The State of Ma ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... (see with advantage: sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. bharat coking coal ltd., r.s. nayak v. a.r. antulay and dhartipakar madan lal agarwal v. rajiv gandhi.) 7. in this view of the matter, we find that the issue referred to the constitution bench does not require our consideration in this case. the review petition ..... these rules are specifically to implement chapter xib, and therefore, power given to state government superimposes itself upon similar power in other sections of the corporation act. by virtue of section 152r, certain sections contained in chapter xia apply with necessary modifications as warranted by chapter xib, and therefore, chapter xia is ..... and thus, having annual turnover below rs.50 crores, cannot be straightway given exemption. such an exemption or classification is not countenanced by scheme of corporation act and is infact counterproductive because the cost of petitioners' product then definitely will be more than the cost thereof for exempted dealers. the amending rules of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //