Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rajghat samadhi act 1951 preamble 1 rajghat samadhi act 1951 Page 13 of about 128,026 results (1.161 seconds)

Ratnamma Palat Vs. Parakkot Muhammadunni

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1972CriLJ1652

..... a proceeding under section 145. lord halsbury. l. c. observed in powell v. kempton park racecourse co. 1899 a.c. 143 the interpretation of statutes and general clauses acts by bindra. 4th edn p. 20:'two propositions are quite clear, one that preamble affords useful light as to what a statute intends to reach, and another that if ..... proceedings' appearing in section 3 of act 20/70 must be read as proceedings in respect of any land over which tenancy right is claimed and the tenant stands in need of a temporary protection against proceedings ..... it is not open to us to read into this section a limitation which is not there. in the contemplation of the legislature 'any proceedings' in section 3 of act 20 of 1970 includes proceedings under section 145 cr. p.c. also the difference between the preamble and the section is not accidental but intentional. the expression 'any .....

Bhagwat Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1984WLN328

..... district judge recorded his fin ling on this issue that the entry of the aforesaid trust as public trust in the prescribed register under section 21 of the act was invalid. the said entry along with the other entries were consequently set-aside. in other words, the findings of the assistant commissioner and the commissioner, ..... is a public trust. he is to record a positive finding on this aspect of the matter regarding the nature of the trust under section 19 of the act. section 20 makes a provision for appeal against the finding of the assistant commissioner. the aggrieved, party may prefer an appeal before the commissioner, deovstan. thereafter ..... of the erst while state of mewar. the learned public prosecutor could not controvert the above position canvassed before me by mr. mathur. the rajasthan public trust act, 1959 as its preamble shows, was enacted to regulate and to make better provision for the administration of public religious and charitable trusts in the state 'a public .....

R. Sankaralingam Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1996]86CompCas709(Mad); 1996CriLJ3387

..... the criminal procedure code, 1973. the third respondent has, without considering the said petition, issued a non-bailable warrant against the petitioner. section 138 of the act gives the holder of a cheque a preferential and unchecked right to institute original proceedings against the drawer, even without proving actual consideration towards the cheque ..... to initiate criminal proceedings against the drawer just for his mental satisfaction. the petitioner is, therefore, praying for a declaration that section 138 of the act is unconstitutional which is opposed to the basic structure of the constitution of india found in the preamble thereto, guaranteeing social and economic justice. 3. ..... in this case. as pointed out already, the law can impose presumptions when certain basic facts and circumstances exist. sections 138 and 139 of the act are based on such presumptions which arise on the existence of certain basic facts and circumstances. 9. the second contention is without any merit. according .....

Kumud Nath Das Saha and ors. Vs. Kunjabala Dassya and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 164Ind.Cas.132

..... instituted by the purchasers of the putni for determination of fair and equitable rent in respect of the darpuini tenure under the provisions of section 7 of the bengal tenancy act. the defence of the defendants to the suit is that the tenure which he holds under the putnidar is a mokrari tenure and its rent is not liable to enhancement .....

Aamir vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... rukka from constable nagesh sent by si jitender for registration of fir ex.pw-1/b. he also deposed about the certificate issued under section 65b of the indian evidence act vide ex.pw-1/d in support of the computerized fir registered.10. constable jagpal appeared as pw-6 and stated that he was posted as munshi/assistant with mhc .....

Fahad vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... rukka from constable nagesh sent by si jitender for registration of fir ex.pw-1/b. he also deposed about the certificate issued under section 65b of the indian evidence act vide ex.pw-1/d in support of the computerized fir registered.10. constable jagpal appeared as pw-6 and stated that he was posted as munshi/assistant with mhc .....

Khandeswar Patra Vs. the State

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1964Ori119; 30(1964)CLT184; 1964CriLJ525

..... floods or drought it becomes necessary to despatch foodgrain very promptly. this aspect must be prominently borne in mind while considering the question as to whether the act alleged to have been committed by the petitioner amounts to a technical offence or should be viewed more seriously.3. the facts found concurrently by both the ..... imprisonment was not justified.5. the removal of the foodgrains from the depot having thus been well established, the first question for consideration is whether the petitioner acted dishonestly in removing food grains and keeping them in his house. i have already shown that the petitioner is not a stranger but a near relation of arikhit ..... the prosecution version that some of the foodgrains were despatched to berhampur by truck has already been shown to be not believable. in my opinion however the act of appropriation is completed as soon as the goods were removed from the depot and kept in his house by the petitioner with the intention of preventing arakhit .....

The State of Madras, Represented by the Collector of Madras Vs. T.M. O ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1969)1MLJ443

..... the operation of any particular enactment may be found in a different enactment covering the same field. in so far as the madras city tenants protection act provides for the control over the eviction of cultivating tenants, though the relevant section excluding its operation in the case of lands belonging to certain specified ..... to above lead to a different conclusion. after quoting the passage from the supreme court decision, natesan, j. proceeded to say that 'the government grants act thus being unavailable, the state sought to stand on the archaic prerogative and immunity of the crown from the operation of the statutes...' and proceeded to consider ..... calcutta : 1960crilj1684 ., the authority has been shaken by the subsequent decisions referred to above. but the interpretation of sections 2 and 3 of the government grants act, 1895 given in that case supports the contention of the learned government pleader.7. the decision in these petitions depends on a proper construction of section 3 .....

Prempal and ors. Vs. the Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... professional perjurers like the self-confessed paniwala are kept captive by the police, to be pressed into service for proving 'cases'. courts, trusting the police may act on apparently veracious testimony and sentence people into prison. the community, satisfied with such convictions, may well believe that all is well with law and order. we ..... fundamental rights cannot be corrected by any other method open to the judiciary to adopt. the right to compensation is some palliative for the unlawful acts of instrumentalities which act in the name of public interest and which present for their protection the powers of the state as a shield. if civilisation is not ..... respondents to prempal in the first instance with liberty to recover the amount in accordance with law from the individual police personnel found responsible for the illegal acts.apology of police officers not convincing34. before concluding this court would like to deal with the affidavits of apology dated 10th march 2010 filed by mr. .....

Anchor Engineering Works Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2001)(130)ELT671TriDel

..... in unambiguous terms in the preamble to the said order that any party aggrieved by the order could prefer appeal to this tribunal under section 35b of the central excise act, 1944. nevertheless, it is a different question as to whether the preamble itself is a part of the order. without going into this question, i am inclined to allow the .....