Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rajghat samadhi act 1951 preamble 1 rajghat samadhi act 1951 Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 14,492 results (0.357 seconds)

Balaji Raghavan and S.P. Anand Vs. Union of Inddia

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1996SC770; JT1995(9)SC393; 1995(7)SCALE202; (1996)1SCC361; [1995]Supp6SCR694; 1996(1)LC197(SC)

..... a copy of the communique that was sent to him from the ministry of home affairs in this regard.15. mr. santosh hegde, senior counsel, responded to our request to act as amicus curiae and advanced arguments before us. he began by stating that the fact that these awards are being grossly misused had occasioned one of the writ petitions. he .....

The State of West Bengal Vs. Anwar Ali Sarkar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC75; 1952CriLJ510; [1952]1SCR284

..... one, may possibly be met by replying on the decision of this court in special reference no. 1 of 1951, in re delhi laws act, 1912, etc. [1951] s.c.r. 747, but the second criticism cannot be so easily met, since an act which gives uncontrolled authority to discriminate cannot but be hit by article 14 and it will be no answer simply ..... judge in respect of these 50 persons on april 2, 1950, that is so say, after the special courts act was passed, superseding the ordinance. the trial lasted for several months and by his judgment dated the 31st of march, 1951, the special judge convicted the accused under various sections of the indian penal code, some of them being sentenced to ..... which came into force on the 26th of january, 1950, applied to his case also. on the 28th of august, 1951, the special bench made the rules absolute and held that section 5 (1) of the west bengal special courts act was void to the extent that it empowers the state to direct any case to be tried by the special court .....

Kathi Raning Rawat Vs. the State of Saurashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC123; 1952CriLJ805; [1952]1SCR435

..... on which the preliminary objection is founded reliance is placed by learned counsel for the appellant on the judgment of this court in case no. 297 of 1951 (the state of west bengal v. anwar ali sarkar). that case was concerned with the validity of the trial of the respondent therein by a special ..... same species of offences committed elsewhere and under ordinary circumstances. this differentia quite clearly has a reasonable relation to the object sought to be achieved by the act, namely, the maintenance of public order, the preservation of public safety, the peace and tranquillity of the state. such a classification will not be repugnant ..... of persons and impose collective fines. the rajpramukh on april 5, 1948 which extended to the state of saurashtra the provisions of the code of criminal procedure (act v of 1898) subject to certain adaptations and modifications mentioned in the schedule thereto. it appears from the affidavit of ramnikrai bhagwandas vesavada, assistant secretary in the .....

The State of Bihar and ors. Vs. Charusila Dasi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1959SC1002; [1959]Supp(2)SCR601

..... created for the worship of a family idol in which the public are not interested and, therefore, the provisions of the bihar hindu religious trusts act, 1950 (bihar i of 1951), hereinafter referred to as the act, do not apply to it. accordingly, it allowed an application made to it under art. 226 of the constitution and quashed the proceedings ..... taken against the respondent herein under sections 59 and 70 of the act. the state of bihar, the president of the bihar state board of religious trusts ..... v. raja ram singh a.i.r. 1954 pat. 164 - both related to the interpretation of some of the provisions of the united provinces encumbered estates act (u.p. act 25 of 1934). in the former case the limited question for decision was if the decreeholder under a decree of the original side of the calcutta high court .....

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in durga shankar mehta v. raghuraj singh, air1954sc520the order of the election tribunal was made final and 346 conclusive by section 105 of the representation of the people act, 1951. the contention was that the finality and conclusiveness the jurisdiction of the supreme court under article 136. this contention was repelled. it was observed: (air p.522 ..... and real if only truncated information of the assets and liabilities is given. 328 the court held that the provision contained in the representation of people act 1951 for a disclosure of assets and liabilities only to the speaker or to the chairman of the house did not adequately protect the citizen s right to ..... land for agricultural purposes from a tenure holder and who is not an occupancy tenant under section 169 or a protected lessee under the berar regulation of agricultural leases act, 1951, shall be ordinary tenant of such land. explanation. for the purposes of this section 140(1991) supp. 2 scc608writ petition (civil) no.494 of 2012 .....

Maharshi Mahesh Jogi V.Vishwavidyalaya Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... provision of part iii and iv of the constitution has made right to education a basic fundamental right.33. the government of india by constitutional (86th amendment act) act, 2002 had added a new article 21a, which provides that ".the state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of 6 ..... of expressions dissemination of knowledge were deleted. after the amendment, the grievance of the appellant was that, prior to the coming into force of the amendment act viz., act 5 of 2000, the officer on special duty, in the department of higher education, sent a memorandum, alleging that the course of study prescribed in clause ..... education and for the determination and maintenance of standards of teaching, examination and research in universities, and for the purpose of performing its functions under this act, the commission may hold certain enquiry and do certain other activities. in fact, the division bench while holding that conduct of courses come exclusively within the .....

R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla Vs. the Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1957SC628; (1957)59BOMLR973; (1957)35MysLJ(SC)180; [1957]1SCR930

..... contravening constitutional prohibitions. it should be mentioned that the decision in romesh thappar v. state of madras : 1950crilj1514 was referred to in the state of bombay v. f.n. balsara : [1951]2scr682 and the state of bombay v. the united motors (india) ltd. : [1953]4scr1069 and distinguished. 24. in chintaman rao v. state of madhya pradesh : [1950]1scr759 , ..... not when it infringes some constitutional prohibitions. 15. in the state of bombay and another v. f. n. balsara : [1951]2scr682 the question was as to the validity of the bombay prohibition act. sections 12 and 13 of the act imposed restrictions on the possession, consumption and sale of liquor, which had been defined in s. 2(24) of the ..... ] a.c. 503. it was approved by the federal court in in re hindu women's rights to property act [1941] f.c.r. 12 and adopted by this court in the state of bombay and another v. f. n. balsara : [1951]2scr682 and the state of bombay v. the united motors (india) ltd., and others : [1953]4scr1069 . .....

State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. Vs. Tvl. South Indian Sugar Mills Assn. a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , despite its nomenclature is in fact a tax. in corpn. of calcutta v. liberty cinema the licence fee charged under section 548 of the calcutta municipal act, 1951 had been challenged on the ground that no service was rendered commensurate with the tax. 7 considerable reliance was placed by the learned senior counsel for the appellant ..... legal conduct of the entire business pertaining to the securities market. we find this to be self-evident from a perusal of the preamble to the sebi act: an act to provide for the establishment of a board to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate, the securities ..... this court in the abovesaid judgments to the facts of the case in hand, it can be seen that the statute under section 11 of the act requires the board to undertake various activities to regulate the business of the securities market which requires constant and continuing supervision including investigation and instituting legal proceedings .....

M/s. M.s.p.l. Limited Rep. By Executive Director Mr. Medavenkataiah Vs ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to make rules and section 41 confers power on the board to frame regulations with the previous approval of the state government. 2002 act:21. this act was promulgated for promotion of industrial development and facilitation of new investments to simplify the regulatory framework. statement of objects and reasons is reproduced ..... of industries in such areas. in view of wide definition of the words "industrial infrastructural facilities" as contained in section 2 (7a) of the act, making of a technology park, research and development centre, townships, trade and tourism centres or making provisions for marketing and banking which would contribute to ..... (viii) provide the procedure for acquisition of land. section 29 provides for determination of compensation of the land acquired. section 30 provides that land acquisition act, 1894 would mutatis mutandis apply with respect to the provisions therein for inquiry and award by the deputy commissioner, reference to court, apportionment and payment .....

Lachmandas Kewalram Ahuja and anr. Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC235; 1952CriLJ1167; [1952]1SCR710

..... been held not to affect such trials in respect of substantive rights and liabilities accrued before the date of the constitution in keshavan madhava menon's case ()[1951] s.c.r. 228., or to go back on that decision and give those provisions of the constitution retrospective effect. i am clearly of opinion ..... by a substantive law but also by a law of procedure and that the procedure prescribed by the corresponding provisions in the west bengal special courts act and the saurashtra ordinance which introduced similar departures from the ordinary law of procedure constituted a discrimination against persons tried by the special judge according to ..... over the appellants case could cease to continue on and after 26th january, 1950. according to the appellants contention, the special procedure prescribed by the impugned act became discriminatory and void after 26th january, 1950, and therefore, inapplicable to what remained of their trial but, could this circumstance affect the competence of the .....