Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rajghat samadhi act 1951 preamble 1 rajghat samadhi act 1951 Court: us supreme court Page 25 of about 9,160 results (0.286 seconds)

Ashok. Vs. Rajendra Bhausaheb Mulak.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of action for consideration by the court so as to entertain the election petition. but the language of section 100 (1) (c) of the representation of people act, 1951 is too clear for any speculation about possibility.5. fortunately, for the respondent/returned candidate, the basis of the election petition filed by the appellant in the instant ..... of the election by voters who were accompanied by another person to the voting compartment which was a breach of the election rules to the representation of people act, 1951. specific averments in regard to such polling of votes is that the voter namely mrs. begam shehaz begum akhtar entered the polling station along with another voter ..... whether the failure to file the original thereof in the court along with the election petition attracts section 81 and therefore, section 86 (1) of the rp act, 1951."11. whether or not schedule 14 is an integral part of the election petition does not depend on whether or not the draftsman of the election petition has .....

Ram Avtar and Others Vs. Ram Dhani and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC107; 1996(7)SCALE393; (1997)2SCC263; [1996]Supp7SCR45

..... pointed out that howsoever wide the power under statutory revision may be in contrast to section 115 of the cpc, still while exercising that power the authority concerned cannot act as court of appeal so as to reappreciate the evidence on record for recording findings on questions of fact. according to us, the high court should have set ..... be settled by the state government with such intermediary, lessee, tenant, grantee or grove-holder, as the case may be, who shall, subject to the provisions of this act, be entitled to take or retain possession as a bhumidhar thereof...4. on a plain reading of section 18(1) it appears that all lands in possession of an ..... not have transferred the same in favour of the respondents. that suit abated in view of issuance of the notification under the provisions of u.p. consolidation of holdings act. thereafter, the same question as to whether the transfer could have been made or not by smt. phoola in favour of the respondents was raised before the consolidation .....

Puranlal Lakhanpal Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1958SC163; 1958CriLJ283; [1958]1SCR460

..... tarsikka v. state of punjab [1952] s.c.r. 368, it was stated that whatever might be the position under the preventive detention act of 1950, before it was amended in 1951, under the act as amended in 1951, the government must determine what the period of detention should be only after the advisory board to which the case is referred reports that ..... c.r. 368. this was also a case for the issue of a writ of habeas corpus for the release of a person detained under the same act as it stood in july 1951. in this case the first order for detention, that is to say the order made before the reference to the advisory board itself fixed the period of ..... to be so made, clause 22(4) has no operation and may for the present discussion be kept aside.' 10. his lordship was considering the act of 1950 previous to the amendments subsequently made therein from 1951 onward, and the observations appear to establish the following three points : first, clause (4) of art. 22, put in affirmative form, has reference .....

AmIn Lal Vs. Hunna Mal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC1243; [1965]1SCR393

..... high court is whether the election tribunal, rohtak, was justified in dismissing the election petition under sub-s. (3) of s. 90 of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereafter referred to as the act) preferred by the appellant on the ground that it did not comply with the provisions of s. 82 of the ..... including suraj bhan, withdrew their candidature within the time prescribed for the purpose with the result that names of only six candidates were published under s. 38 of the act. several grounds were set out by the appellant in his election petition for setting aside the election. one of those grounds was that the respondent, his agents and other ..... connection to two decisions of this court in k. kamaraj nadar v. kunju thevari : [1959]1scr583 and mallappa bassappa v. basavaraj ayyappa : [1959]1scr611 . 13. in the act as it stood prior to its amendment in 1956 the provisions of the code of civil procedure relating to trial of suits were made applicable to trial of election petitions .....

Balwan Singh Vs. Prakash Chand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC1187; (1976)2SCC440; [1976]3SCR335

p.n. shinghal, j.1. civil appeal no. 775 of 1975 has been filed under section 116a of the representation of the people act, 1951, hereinafter referred to as the act, by balwan singh whose election to the uttar pradesh legislative assembly from the sarwan khera constituency at the general election of 1974, has been set aside ..... his consent, hired and procured vehicles for the free conveyance of electors and committed corrupt practice as provided under sub-section (5) of section 123 of the act. it also noticed paragraph 12 which clearly stated that the concise statement of material facts in relation to the aforesaid ground relating to the procuring and hiring of ..... the schedule was an integral part of the election petition, and the original election petition thus contained what was required to be stated by section 83 of the act, and the amendment was meant to furnish some further particulars in regard to the same corrupt practice. it is therefore futile to contend that a new corrupt practice .....

Jugal Kishore Patnaik Vs. Ratnakar Mohanty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC2130; (1977)1SCC567; [1977]1SCR49; 1976(8)LC688(SC)

..... in a democracy, the electoral process has a strategic role and in india it has constitutional status although (sic) by the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter called the act). lord holt long ago observed : (quoted in university of pensylvania law review 1968 p. 24 (vol. 117))a right that a man has ..... orissa for execution of certain works. the respondent, it was accordingly asserted, was disqualified under section 9a of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the act) from seeking election. some documents were also produced before the returning officer to show that proceedings had been initiated by the block development ..... by the petitioner was in substantial compliance of sections 33 and 34 of the representation of the people act, 1951?3. was the petitioner disqualified under section 9a of the representation of the people act, 1951 having subsisting contract with the government of orissa in course of his trade and business for execution of work .....

Thirumala Tirupati Devasthanams and anr. Vs. Thallappaka Ananthacharyu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3290; 2003(6)ALD72(SC); 2003(6)ALT40(SC); JT2004(6)SC425; 2003(7)SCALE352; (2003)8SCC134

..... of annamacharya. 5. the t.t.d. filed an application before the revenue divisional officer, chandragiri in 1962 under the madras hindu religious and charitable endowments act, 1951 against tallapaka venkata seshacharyuiu seeking resumption of the inam alleging that it was a grant in favour of the 'manager for the time being of nandanavanam at ..... apparent on the face of the record observations in following cases were cited with approval:'the decision in rex v. northumberland compensation appeal tribunal; ex parte shaw [1951] 1 k.b. 711 was taken in appeal, and was affirmed by the court of appeal in rex v. northumberland compensation appeal tribunal; ex parte shaw ..... . that application was disposed of by the revenue divisional officer holding that the inams deputy tahsildar, chandragiri had already issued a ryotwari patta under the inams abolition act in favour of the t.t.d. and, therefore, no further relief was called for. the inamdars carried the matter in revision to the commissioner, survey .....

Kalyan Kumar Gogoi. Vs. Ashutosh Agnihotri and Another.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... that the election of the respondent no. 2, who is returned candidate, was materially affected because of non-compliance with the provisions of the representation of the people act, 1951, or rules or orders made under it.26.on the facts and in the circumstances of the case this court is of the firm opinion that the learned single ..... the election of the returned candidate to be void."14. it may be mentioned that here in this case non- compliance with the provisions of the representation of people act, 1951 and the election rules of 1961 was by the officers, who were in- charge of the conduct of the election and not by the elected candidate. it is true ..... high court in view of the provisions contained in part vi of the representation of the people act, 1951 and section 87(2) of the act of 1951, which specifically provides that the provisions of the indian evidence act, 1872, shall subject to the provisions of the act, be deemed to apply in all respects to the trial of an election petition. the .....

G.M. Siddeshwar. Vs. Prasanna Kumar.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... scr 13 the question raised was as follows:whether the election petition is liable to be dismissed for contravention of section 81 (3) of the representation of the people act, 1951 as copy of annexure a' to the petition was not given along with the petition for being served on the respondents.58. it was noted that the contents ..... , merely because the affidavit may be defective, it cannot be said that the petition filed is not an election petition as understood by the representation of the people act, 1951.the facts:4. the challenge in these appeals is to a judgment and order dated 24th february 2010 passed by a learned single judge of the high court of ..... practices have been alleged against the returned candidate) as required by the proviso to section 83(1) of the representation of the people act, 1951. in our opinion, there is no such mandate in the representation of the people act, 1951 and a reading of p.a. mohammed riyas v. m.k. raghavan & ors., (2012) 5 scc 511 which suggests to .....

Rai Chand JaIn Vs. Miss Chandra Kanta Khosla

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1991SC744; JT1990(4)SC638; 1990(2)SCALE1131; (1991)1SCC422; [1990]Supp3SCR91

..... for non-residential purpose. the high court after examining the provision of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1951 read with section 11 of the rent act held that statute prohibits conversion of residential building into non-residential building by act inter vivos. it was further held that the landlord and the tenant by their mutual consent cannot convert residential ..... of the sector in the city and letting out of such residential building for the purpose of trade in violation of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act 1951 would not bring it within the fold of non-residential building as defined in clause (d) of section 2 of the said ..... be used for running the press therein. subsequently in order to avoid the effect of the legal bar provided in section 11 of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949 (act no. e.p.a iii of 1949), the impugned lease deed was got executed by the tenant/respondent, rai chand jain. this will be clear from the lease .....