Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rajghat samadhi act 1951 preamble 1 rajghat samadhi act 1951 Court: us supreme court Page 13 of about 9,160 results (0.974 seconds)

Jan 19 2012 (SC)

Jagan Singh (Dead) Through Lrs. Vs. Dhanwanti and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2012(2)SCC628; 2012(1)KLT69(SN); AIR2012SCW893; 2012(3)MLJ370; 2012(4)KCCR258(SN)

..... constitution of india raises the question as to whether a bhumidhar having a right to transfer his land under u.p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1951 (the u.p. act for short), while bequeathing his bhumidhari right in favour of a beneficiary can impose a restriction on the right of the legatee to make it a ..... was only on account of the will made by deceased umrao singh. he declined to accept that her right was restricted under section 14 (2) of the hindu succession act, 1956, and dismissed the suit.6. the appellant carried the matter in appeal, but the learned additional district judge also dismissed the appeal. thereafter, when the appellant ..... 14. property of a female hindu to be her absolute property.- (1) any property possessed by a female hindu, whether acquired before or after the commencement of this act, shall be held by her as full owner thereof and not as a limited owner.explanation - in this sub-section, `property' includes both movable and immovable property acquired .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2008 (SC)

Aslam Mohd. Merchant Vs. Competent Authority and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3621; 2008(3)KLT400; 2008(II)OLR(SC)393; 2008(10)SCALE383; 2008(2)LC855(SC); 2008AIRSCW4868; 2008CriLJ3621; 2008(3)Crimes122

..... in state of gujarat and anr. etc. v. mehboob khan usman khan etc. : 1969crilj26 .this court therein, was considering the provisions of the bombay police act of 1951. the said statute postulated externment of the noticee on the basis of `general allegations' made against him keeping in view the statutory requirements, this court opined ..... ors. v. amratlal prajivandas and ors. : 1995crilj426 while considering the validity of the provisions of the smugglers and foreign exchange manipulators (forfeiture of property) act, 1976, opined:44...the relatives and associates are brought in only for the purpose of ensuring that the illegally acquired properties of the convict or detenu, ..... treated to be illegally acquired property, which may be only a relevant factor but would not necessarily lead to the said conclusion.the act6. the act was enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to narcotic drugs, to make stringent provisions for the control and regulation of operation relating to narcotic .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2006 (SC)

Kuldip Nayar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC3127; JT2006(8)SC1; 2006(8)SCALE257; (2006)7SCC1

..... secrecy of ballot will have to yield to the larger principle of free and fair elections....(emphasis supplied)the court, after noticing that the rp act, 1951 is a self- contained code on the subject of elections and reiterating that 'there is one fundamental principle which permeates through all democratically elected parliamentary ..... impugned amendments violate the fundamental right under article 19(1)(a) of the constitution as well as the provisions in the representation of the people act, 1951, universal declaration of human rights and international covenant on civil and political rights. the petitioners urge that human rights contained in universal declaration of human ..... hand.submissions on domicile requirements10. shri sachar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, contended that the impugned amendment to section 3 of the rp act, 1951 offends the principle of federalism, the basic feature of the constitution; it seeks to change the character of republic which is the foundation of our .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1993 (SC)

R.C. Poudyal and ors. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1993SC1804; JT1993(2)SC1; 1993(1)SCALE489; 1994Supp(1)SCC324; [1993]1SCR891

..... such a manner as may be directed by the election commission. consequently amendments were made by inserting section 5a in the representation of the people act, 1951. the extent of each constituency and the reservation of seats were initially directed to follow the position immediately before the merger under the thirty-sixth amendment ..... section 'bhutia' includes chumbipa, dopthapa, dukpa, kagatey, sherps, tibetan, tromopa and yolmo.26. section 5-a was also introduced in the representation of the people act, 1951. 25 sub-section (2) of section 5a provides:5a (2) notwithstanding anything contained in section 5, a person shall not be qualified to be chosen to ..... ) ordinnce, 1979' promulgated by the president of india on 11.9.1979, amendments were introduced to the representation of the people act, 1950 and the representation of the people act, 1951 to enable fresh elections to the sikkim assembly on certain basis considered appropriate to and in conformity with the historical evolution of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 1977 (SC)

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1977SC1361; (1977)3SCC592; [1978]1SCR1

..... law, justice and company affairs calling upon all the parliamentary constituencies to elect members in accordance with section 14(2) of the representation of the people act, 1951. in pursuance of this notification the election commission on the same day appointed the dates when elections were to be held in various constituencies. this order ..... was passed under section 30 of the representation of the people act, 1951. further details are not necessary for the purpose of deciding the issues arising in this case. suffice it to mention that in consequence of the ..... company affairs passed under sub-section (2) of section 14 of the representation of the people act, 1951 by which the president called upon the parliamentary constituencies to elect members in accordance with the provisions of the said act and of the rules and orders de thereunder. in pursuance of this notification the election commission .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 1964 (SC)

Corporation of Calcutta and anr. Vs. Liberty Cinema

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC1107; [1965]2SCR477

..... in schedule vii to the constitution. to illustrate the point, we would refer to a legislation like the industries development and regulation act, 1951 (central act 65 of 1951). it is an act to provide for the development and regulation of certain industries. under the provisions of s. 11 of that enactment no new industrial ..... thirth swamiar of sri shirur mutt(1) where this court had to consider the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the madras hindu religious and charitable endowments act, 1951 in its application to mutts. among the provisions considered in that context was a. 76 of that enactment, which directed every religious institution to "pay ..... in the result we would allow the appeal with costs through- out. ayyangar, j. section 443 of the calcutta municipal act, 1951 (west bengal act xxxiii of 1951) which will hereafter be referred to as the act enacts : "no person shall, without or otherwise than in conformity with the terms of a licence granted by the commissioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2012 (SC)

Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... different entries in list i and list ii were involved but with reference to the declaration made in section 2 of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 (for short, idr act) vis--vis the state act under challenge, the majority judgment relying upon the earlier decisions of this court in baijnath kadioc and chanan malx, held that to the extent the ..... court way back in state of bihar vs. kameshwar singh reported in air 1952 sc 252. in any case, the act had been placed at entry no. 1 in ninth schedule which was added by constitution (first amendment) act, 1951 and was protected by article 31-b. as held by this court in waman rao vs. union of india reported in ..... 1981 (2) scc 362, the act was clearly beyond the pale of challenge. the state had the inherent power to reserve any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 1964 (SC)

Sajjan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC845; [1965]1SCR933

..... the history of articles 31a and 31b. articles 31a and 31b were added to the constitution with retrospective effect by s. 4 of the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951. it is a matter of general knowledge that it became necessary to add these two provisions in the constitution, because it was realised that legislative measures adopted by ..... were beyond the reach of any future amendment. 34. let us illustrate this point by reference to some of the provisions of the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951 itself. by this act, articles 15, 19 and 31 were amended. one has merely to recall the purpose for which it became necessary to amend articles 15, 19 to be ..... fundamental rights are those rights which the people have reserved for themselves that learned judge has emphatically stated in in re the delhi laws act, 1912 ([1951] s.c.r. 747) that parliament, acting within the limits of its legislative power, has plenary powers of legislation which are as large and which are of the same nature as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1959 (SC)

Prem Nath Kaul Vs. the State of Jammu and Kashmir

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1959SC749; [1959]Supp(2)SCR270

..... authority or tribunal in the state which could question his right or power to adopt such a course. as chief justice kania has observed in re : delhi laws act, : [1951]2scr747 . 'a legislative body which is sovereign like an autocratic ruler has power to do anything. it may, like a ruler, by an individual decision, direct ..... what solution would satisfactorily meet the requirements of the situation. we have no doubt that the yuvaraj was perfectly competent to issue the proclamation on april 20, 1951, under which the constituent assembly ultimately came to be elected and convened. it the constituent assembly was properly constituted and it decided not to pay any compensation ..... in the section. with the rest of the sections we are not concerned in the present appeal. 19. after the act was enacted by the yuvaraj he issued a proclamation on april 20, 1951, directing that a constituent assembly consisting of representatives of the people elected on the basis of adult franchise shall be constituted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1977 (SC)

State of Karnataka Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1978SC68; (1977)4SCC608; [1978]2SCR1

..... to inquire into the said allegations; now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the commissions of inquiry act, 1952 (central act 60 of 1952) the government of karnataka hereby appoint justice shri mir iqbal hussain, retired judge of the karnataka high court to be the commission of inquiry....the ..... list iii. it is significant to note that after bakshi's case was decided by the supreme court in 1966, amendments were introduced to the commissions of inquiry act by act 79 of 1971. section 8b runs as follows :-8b. if, at any stage of the inquiry, the commission,-(a) considers it necessary to inquire into the ..... to inquire into the said allegations :now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the commissions of inquiry act, 1952 (central act 60 of 1952) the government of karnataka hereby appoint justice shri mir iqbal hussain, retired judge of the karnataka high court to be the commission of inquiry for .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //