Court : Chhattisgarh
..... appellants, has argued that they eye-witnesses were not reliable; in fact, deceased-patwari had assaulted appellant-moolchand (a-2) and then the quarrel begun between both the parties in which the deceased persons sustained above injuries; appellant-moolchand (a-2) had also sustained injury in the said incident and hisinjuries were not explained by the prosecution; the deceased persons were aggressor who begun the fight; therefore, the ..... had stated in para 2 that firstly deceased-patwari had assaulted appellant-moolchand (a-2) by a denga (danda) and thereafter the appellants had assaulted the deceased persons, therefore, the prosecution has not disclosed the genesis of the ..... in para 7 of the cross-examination that there was a land dispute between both the parties (his father and uncle), but except the above nothing material could be brought on record against him. ..... sessions judge relied on the testimonies of these witnesses and held that the appellants (a-1 and a-2) had assaulted the deceased by danda and wood, therefore, they were liable for punishment u/s ..... opined that the above injuries were ante-mortem caused by hard and rough object and the cause of death was shock and haemorrhage on account of above injuries and the death was homicidal in nature. ..... were sent for chemical examination to forensic science laboratory (fsl), raipur, from where a report was received. ..... 27 of the evidence act were recorded and certain clothes including lathi were seized at their instances vide seizure .....
Tag this Judgment!