Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
..... averred in its written statement that on the basis of condition no.5 mentioned in the insurance policy, the appellant/o.p.no.1 is entitled to cancel the insurance policy unilaterally and the appellant/o.p.no.1, had already cancelled the insurance policy prior to the death of chhatar singh, therefore, the complainant is not entitled for insured amount. ..... of the above, are of the view that the petition had cancelled the policy as per clause no.5 of the terms and conditions of the policy which had been issued in favour of respondent no.2 even giving the reasons for cancellation of the ..... notice shall be deemed sufficiently given if post addressed to the insured at the address last registered in the companys books and shall be deemed to have been received by the insured at the time when same would be delivered in the ordinary ..... by the insurance company it had not been mentioned that after cancellation of the insurance policy the insured was personally intimated as per rules and he was refunded prorata premium amount, therefore, in our opinion the repudiation of claim is not valid and in these circumstances the insurance company is liable to pay the amount of insurance to the complainant. ..... a.n.kanwar conducted the post mortem examination on the dead body of the deceased (chhatar singh) and gave his report, in which he opined that the cause of death is coma due to ..... that the complaint filed by the complainant is barred by time under section 24 a of the consumer protection act, 1986. 4. o.p. .....
Tag this Judgment!