Court : Supreme Court of India
Civil Appeal No.2586 of 2020 @ SLP (C)No.15790 of 2019 etc. The Inspector General of Registration, Tamil Nadu & Ors. vs. K. Baskaran 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2586 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.15790 of 2019) THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, TAMIL NADU AND ORS. Appellants K. BASKARAN Versus WITH Respondent CIVIL APPEAL NO.2587 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.2609 of 2019) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2588 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.17103 of 2019) WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos.2589-2592 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.6011-6014 of 2019) WITH Civil Appeal No.2586 of 2020 @ SLP (C)No.15790 of 2019 etc. The Inspector General of Registration, Tamil Nadu & Ors. vs. K. Baskaran 2 CIVIL APPEAL Nos.2593-2597 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.31633-31637 of 2018) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2598 OF2020(Arising out of Special L...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.8588 of 2019 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.15804 of 2017]. REPORTABLE Rojer Mathew Appellant(S) VERSUS South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. Respondent(S) WITH W.P.(C) No.267/2012, W.P.(C) No.279/2017, W.P.(C) No.558/2017, W.P.(C) No.561/2017, W.P.(C) No.625/2017, W.P.(C) No.640/2017, W.P.(C) No.1016/2017, W.P.(C) No.788/2017, W.P.(C) No.925/2017, W.P.(C) No.1098/2017, W.P.(C) No.1129/2017, W.P.(C) No.33/2018, W.P.(C) No.205/2018, W.P.(C) No.467/2018, T.C.(C) No.49/2018, T.C.(C) No.51/2018, T.P.(C) No.2199/2018 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, CJI1 Leave granted. BRIEF BACKGROUND:2. In the present batch of cases, the constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017 and of the rules framed in consonance has been assailed. While it would be repetitious to reproduce the pleadings of each case separately, a brief reference is being made, illustratively, to the prayers made in three matters to aid t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
% + CRL.A.1200/2016 HASEEB versus STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: ..... Appellant ..... Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:31. 10.2019 Mr. Dhan Mohan, Ms. Tanu B. Mishra, Mr. Ravi Mishra and Ms. Roshni Rani. For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J The appellant has filed the present appeal, inter alia, impugning 1. a judgment dated 06.06.2016 passed by the Ld. ASJ Spl. FTC, Saket Courts, Delhi, whereby the appellant was convicted of the offences punishable under Sections 342/376/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The appellant also impugns an order dated 08.06.2016, whereby the appellant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and a fine of 1,000/- (in default of which he would have to undergo imprisonment for a period of one month) for the offence under Section 342 of the IPC; rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and a f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h July, 2019. + TEST.CAS. 104/2014 & I.A.1551/2015 (u/o VII Rule 11 CPC) PRADEEP KHULLAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A. K. Tewari, Ms. Nistha Gupta and Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Advocates. (M:9415152494) versus THE STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Yashmeet Kaur, Advocate for R (M:9810788943) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. None appears for Respondent No.3 for the last several hearings.2. The Present Test. Case has been filed seeking probate of Will dated 4th May, 1986 and Codicil dated 5th May, 1986 executed by Late Shri Krishan Lal Khullar. The petition has been preferred by Shri Pradeep Khullar, one of the sons of Late Shri Krishan Lal Khullar against his brother - Shri Virendra Khullar (Respondent No.2) and sister - Smt. Neelam Khanna (Respondent No.3). The reliefs sought in the petition are as under: (i) Grant a Probate of the Will dated 04.05.1986 and Codicil dated 05.05...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Civil Appeal No of 2019 @ SLP(C)No.20 of 2018 etc. 1 State of Bihar and Ors. vs. The Bihar Secondary Teachers Struggle Committee, Munger & Ors. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.20 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.4862 OF2019STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. Appellants VERSUS THE BIHAR SECONDARY TEACHERS STRUGGLE COMMITTEE, MUNGER & ORS. Respondents WITH (ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.708 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.4872 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.238 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.4867 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.242 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.4866 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.169 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.4864 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.162 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.4865 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.254 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.4869 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.164 O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI08h February, 2019 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on 28th February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10725/2017 V K SASIKALA Through : Dr.A.M.Singhvi, ... Petitioner Senior Advocate with Mr.Amit Anand Tiwari, Mr.Vivek Singh, Mr.N. Raja Senthoor Pandian, Ms. Mary Mitzy, Ms.Shakun Sharma, Ms.Harshal Gupta and Ms.Devyani Gupta, Advocates versus THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS ... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.P.R.Chopra, Advocate for respondent Kohli, Ms.Garima Sengupta, no.1/ECI Mr.C.S. Vaidyanathan, Mr.K.V. Viswanathan and Mr.Guru Krishna Kumar, Senior Advocates with Mr.Balaji Srinivasan, Mr.Siddhant Jain, Ms.Pallavi Ms.Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Ms.Lakshmi Rao, Mr.Anirudh Gupta, Mr.Harsh Vaidyanathan Shankar, Mr.Ram Shankar, Ms.Pratiksha Mishra, Mr.Ravi Raghunath, Ms.Srishti Govil, Mr.Arunava Mr.Mayank Kshirsagar, Mr.Babu Murugavel, Mr.Prakash Kumar Gandhi and Mr.R.Rakesh Sharma, Advocates for respondents no.2 to 4. Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI08h February, 2019 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on 28th February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10725/2017 V K SASIKALA Through : Dr.A.M.Singhvi, ... Petitioner Senior Advocate with Mr.Amit Anand Tiwari, Mr.Vivek Singh, Mr.N. Raja Senthoor Pandian, Ms. Mary Mitzy, Ms.Shakun Sharma, Ms.Harshal Gupta and Ms.Devyani Gupta, Advocates versus THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS ... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.P.R.Chopra, Advocate for respondent Kohli, Ms.Garima Sengupta, no.1/ECI Mr.C.S. Vaidyanathan, Mr.K.V. Viswanathan and Mr.Guru Krishna Kumar, Senior Advocates with Mr.Balaji Srinivasan, Mr.Siddhant Jain, Ms.Pallavi Ms.Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Ms.Lakshmi Rao, Mr.Anirudh Gupta, Mr.Harsh Vaidyanathan Shankar, Mr.Ram Shankar, Ms.Pratiksha Mishra, Mr.Ravi Raghunath, Ms.Srishti Govil, Mr.Arunava Mr.Mayank Kshirsagar, Mr.Babu Murugavel, Mr.Prakash Kumar Gandhi and Mr.R.Rakesh Sharma, Advocates for respondents no.2 to 4. Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI08h February, 2019 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on 28th February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10725/2017 V K SASIKALA Through : Dr.A.M.Singhvi, ... Petitioner Senior Advocate with Mr.Amit Anand Tiwari, Mr.Vivek Singh, Mr.N. Raja Senthoor Pandian, Ms. Mary Mitzy, Ms.Shakun Sharma, Ms.Harshal Gupta and Ms.Devyani Gupta, Advocates versus THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS ... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.P.R.Chopra, Advocate for respondent Kohli, Ms.Garima Sengupta, no.1/ECI Mr.C.S. Vaidyanathan, Mr.K.V. Viswanathan and Mr.Guru Krishna Kumar, Senior Advocates with Mr.Balaji Srinivasan, Mr.Siddhant Jain, Ms.Pallavi Ms.Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Ms.Lakshmi Rao, Mr.Anirudh Gupta, Mr.Harsh Vaidyanathan Shankar, Mr.Ram Shankar, Ms.Pratiksha Mishra, Mr.Ravi Raghunath, Ms.Srishti Govil, Mr.Arunava Mr.Mayank Kshirsagar, Mr.Babu Murugavel, Mr.Prakash Kumar Gandhi and Mr.R.Rakesh Sharma, Advocates for respondents no.2 to 4. Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:7. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8791/2018 & CM APPLs. 52194-95/2018 MASTER SINGHAM (THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. with Mr. Mohit Mudgal and Ms.Akansha Sharma, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.S. Sudheer, Adv. with Mrs. A. Mathew and Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % 1. Master Singham is an 8-year old boy. He was granted admission, in the Sanskriti School (hereinafter referred to as the School) in 2013, under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category. Three years later, his admission was ignominiously cancelled, by the Directorate of Education (DoE), vide under Section 24(3) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the DSE Act) read with c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 05.2018 Pronounced on:21. 12.2018 ITA6742017, C.M. APPL.29470/2017; ITA6212017; ITA6272017; ITA6282017; ITA6292017; ITA6712017; ITA6752017, C.M. APPL.29471; ITA6772017 GE ENERGY PARTS INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX ...... Appellant Versus Versus ...... Appellant INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS ITA6432017; ITA6462017; ITA6552017; ITA6692017 & ITA6852017 GE GENBACHER GMBH & CO. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6442017; ITA6522017, C.M. APPL.29312/2017; ITA6532017; ITA6662017 & ITA8372017 GE ENGINE SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN BHD....... Appellant COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6452017; ITA6542017; ITA6572017; ITA6682017; ITA6842017 & ITA6882017 GE PACKAGED POWER INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX INCOME TAX ...... Appellant Versus Versus ITA6472017; ITA6702017...
Tag this Judgment!