Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :12. 09.2024 Pronounced on :24. 09.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.22356 OF2024(GM RES) BETWEEN: SHRI SIDDARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT78YEARS S/O SHRI SIDDARAME GOWDA HONBLE CHIEF MINISTER OF KARNATAKA RESIDING AT NO.6, CAUVERY CRESCENT BENGALURU 560 001. ... PETITIONER (BY DR. ABHISHEK MANU SINGHVI, A/W., PROF. RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI SHATHABISH SHIVANNA, SRI SAMRUDH S.HEGDE, AND SRI ABHISHEK J., ADVOCATES) AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA2BENGALURU 560 001. 2 . THE SPECIAL SECRETARY TO HIS EXCELLENCY THE GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA RAJ BHAVAN, BENGALURU 560 001. 3 . MR. ABRAHAM T. J., RESIDING AT ASHIRVAD23262ND A CROSS, 16 B MAIN HAL2D STAGE, INDIRANAGAR BENGALURU 560 008. 4 . SRI SNEHAMAYI KRISHNA AGED ABOUT54YEARS S/O LATE SIDDAPPA RESIDING AT NO.335, BANDIPALYA GANAPATHY ASHRAMA POST MYSURU ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC637IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.OF2024(@ SLP (Crl.) No.5416/2024) PREM PRAKASH APPELLANT(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT RESPONDENT(s) JUDGMENT K.V. Viswanathan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present appeal challenges the judgment dated 22.03.2024 of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in B.A. No.9863 of 2023. By the said judgment, the High Court dismissed the bail application of the appellant. The appellant sought for regular bail in connection with ECIR Case No.5 of 2023 in ECIR-RNZO/10/2023 (hereinafter referred to as ECIR Case No.5 of 2023) registered for the offence 1 under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as PMLA) and pending before the Court of Special Judge, PMLA, Ranchi. Brief Facts 3. The predicate offence on the basis of which ECIR No.5 of 2023 was recorded on 07.03.2023 is an FIR bearing Sadar P.S. Case No.399 of 2022 r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2024 INSC558IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) No.352 of 2023 Gaurav Kumar Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. Respondents With T.C.(C) No.28 of 2023 With T.C.(C) No.29 of 2023 With T.C.(C) No.30 of 2023 With T.P.(C) No.2526 of 2023 With T.P.(C) No.1982 of 2023 With T.P.(C) Nos. 2088-2089 of 2023 With T.P.(C) No.2171 of 2023 With T.P.(C) No.2123 of 2023 And With T.P.(C) No.2734 of 2023 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents A. Background .......................................................................................................... 4 B. Issues .................................................................................................................... 8 C. Submissions ........................................................................................................ 8 D. Legal background .............................................................................................. 13...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC486IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6741 OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.12941 OF2023 SUBODH KUMAR SINGH RATHOUR ...APPELLANT VERSUS THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX ................................................................................ 2 B. IMPUGNED ORDER ................................................................................ 7 C. DEVELOPMENTS THAT OCCURRED DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. ............................................................... 10 D. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT ........................ 15 E. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT ..................... 17 F. POINTS FOR DETERMINATION ........................................................ 18 G. ANALYSIS .......................................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC499Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.864 OF2022MUTHYALA SUNIL KUMAR PETITIONER (S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) No.1243/2023 in W.P.(C) No.864/2022 AND WRIT PETITION (C) No.756/2023 WITH CONMT.PET.(C) No.1244/2023 in W.P.(C) No.756/2023 AND WRIT PETITION (C) No.819/2023 WITH CONMT.PET.(C) No.1245/2023 in W.P.(C) No.819/2023 AND WRIT PETITION (C) No.1033/2023 WITH CONMT.PET. (Diary No.46438/2023) in W.P. (C) No.1033 of 2023 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.864 OF2022ETC.ETC. Page 1 of 11 WITH W.P.(C) No.998/2023 W.P.(C) No.1043/2023 W.P.(C) No.1058/2023 W.P.(C) No.1064/2023 W.P.(C) No.1047/2023 W.P.(C) No.1059/2023 W.P.(C) No.1066/2023 W.P.(C) No.1103/2023 W.P.(C) No.1104/2023 W.P.(C) No.1105/2023 W.P.(C) No.970/2023 W.P.(C) No.975/2023 W.P.(C) No.1034/2023 W.P.(C) No.1007/2023 W.P.(C) No.996/2023 W.P.(C) No.984/2023 W.P.(C) No.1015/2023 W.P.(C) No.995/2023 W.P.(C) No.1000/2023 W.P.(C) No.1039/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE04H DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION No.4160/2019 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: M/S. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT. LTD., PLOT No.1, BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA, BIDADI, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-562 109. REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, EMPLOYEE RELATIONS, SRI G. SHANKARA. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI S. N. MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN FOR THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, 19/19, JEEVAN SOUDHA BUILDING, GROUND FLOOR, 24TH MAIN, J.P. NAGAR1T PHASE, BENGALURU560078.2. M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, No.9, 10/4, MITHRA TOWERS, KASTURBA ROAD, BENGALURU560001. REP. BY ITS MANAGER. 23. MR. CHANDRASHEKAR K.S., AGED ABOUT40YEARS, T.M. No.1155, TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT. LTD., PLOT No.1, BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA, BIDADI, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT562109. RESPONDENTS (R1 SERVED; SRI JANARDHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI K.B. NARAYANA SWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PET...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC135REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2878 OF2024(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.17402 of 2017) LUCKNOW NAGAR NIGAM & OTHERS APPELLANTS VERSUS KOHLI BROTHERS COLOUR LAB. PVT. LTD. & OTHERS RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA, J.Leave granted.2. The present Civil Appeal has been filed by the Lucknow Nagar Nigam (Municipal Corporation) impugning the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad that has allowed the Writ Petition filed by respondent herein (the assessee), thereby holding that the assessee is exempt from payment of property tax under the provisions of the UP Municipal Corporation Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No.17402 of 2017 Page 1 of 143 Adhiniyam, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as Act of 1959, for brevity sake). Birds Eye View of the Controversy:3. Whether statutory vesting of property termed as enemy property under the provisions of the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for the sake of convenience) ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 2024 INSC97REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.753/2023 SUSHIL KUMAR PANDEY & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.921/2023 JUDGMENT In these two writ petitions, we are to address the legality of the selection process of District Judge Cadre in the State of Jharkhand initiated in the year 2022. An advertisement bearing No.01/2022 was published on 24th March, 2022, inviting applications from the eligible candidates for the said posts. The vacancies specified in the advertisement itself were twenty-two. Appointment procedure to the said posts is guided by the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2001 (the 2001 Rules). In the year 2017, the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service) Regulation, 2017 (the 2017 Regulation) was framed in terms of Rule 11 and Rule...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2023 INSC1058IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL WRIT / APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.1099 of 2019 IN RE: ARTICLE370OF THE CONSTITUTION With Writ Petition (C) No.871 of 2015 With Writ Petition (C) No.722 of 2014 With SLP (C) No.19618 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.1013 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1082 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1068 of 2019 1 With Writ Petition (C) No.1037 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1062 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1070 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1104 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1165 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1210 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1222 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.396 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.756 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.398 pf 2018 With 2 Writ Petition (C) No.924 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1092 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1162 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1048 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1268 of 2019 And With Writ Petition (...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2023INSC975IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6190 OF2023UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DILIP PAUL RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of the exposition, this judgement is divided in the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX ................................................................................................. 4 A.1 On-Spot/Preliminary Inquiry Report .......................................................................... 6 A.2 Frontier Complaints Committees Inquiry Report...................................................... 9 A.3 Central Complaints Committees Inquiry Report ..................................................... 10 A.4 Defence of the Respondent ....................................................................................... 23 A.5 Proceedings before the CAT ..................................................................................... 23 A.6 Proce...
Tag this Judgment!