Railway Protection Force Amendment Act 2003 Section 5 - Judgment Search Results

Surendra Pal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1986WLN(UC)88

to all the posts of assistant security officer in the railway protection force and the petitioner was eligible for being considered dated march 28 1974 of the chief security officer railway protection force new delhi wherein it was stated that the provisional and it cannot apply to the prosecuting inspectors in the force by virtue of 29 of the rules c railway establishment assistant security officer under the rules as amended by the amendment rules the regulations and the rules of 1968 we are xxiii of 1957 here in after referred to as the act of 1957 this act was enacted for the constitution and rules governing the promotion of subordinate staff consits of two sections a and b section a deals with promotion to class for the better protection and security of railway property section 5 of the act is as under 5 classes and ranks

Om Prakash and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1996WLC(Raj)UC136; 1995(2)WLN67

of natural justice d constitution of india article 311 and railway protection force rules 1987 rule 153 validity of reasonable opportunity is provided by or under this act 19 the railway protection force act 1957 came to be amended in the year by the central govt as a superior officer of the force section 4 of the act pertains to the appointment and thus it is clear that by the railway protection force amendment act 1985 major changes have been brought in the railway classification control and appeal rules 1965 or under the army act and the army rules is unguided or uncanalised in any the force and their conditions of service in the force section 21 2 g empowers the central govt to make the also been challenged in d b civil writ petitions no 5155 of 1990 2399 of 1991 3594 of 1991 4218 of

All India Railway Protection Force Association and Another vs.union of ...

Court : Delhi

have filed an affidavit stating that the rules i e railway protection force rules 1987 have not been modified or amended rules 54 1 c 76 and 277 of the railway protection force rules 1987 to the extent they permit appointment of as such appointment would be ultra vires the railway protection force act 1957 and article 14 of the constitution the third sections 17 18 and 19 of the railway protection force amendment act 1985 being three separate provision it would be incoherent was to be exercised when the railway protection force amendment act 1985 was enforced it gave the existing employees of the would be added the second correction was to add sub sections 4 and 5 to section 21 of the act sub to be added and enacted as sub sections 4 and 5 to section 21 of the principal act this was not

M. Gopalakrishna Vs. Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protect ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD704; 2006(5)ALT408

with reference to the first charge rule 104 3 of railway protection force rules specifically contemplates that no member of the any special emolument b b substituted word member by railway protection force amendment ac 60 of 1985 s 10 20 9 the offender s duties as an enrolled member of the force or iv when for reasons to be recorded in writing absent for 30 days or more the contention that the amendment would not apply was rejected by the supreme court in was registered against him by local police cuddapah for criminal act with his subsequent arrest on 22 10 1994 being a beyond reasonable doubt the accused were entitled for acquittal under section 232 cr that the petitioner herein was arrested by the local police 59 the petitioner was placed under suspension on 12 10 1994

Shiv Kumar Tiwari Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1986)2GLR1038; (1987)ILLJ386Guj

out the definition given in the amended act regarding the railway protection force wherein it is stated that they will be on 6th september 1985 that section 3 of the railway protection force act 1957 got amended originally section 3 of the of such number of superior officers and members of the force and shall receive such pay and other remuneration as may is an armed force of the union subsequent to the amendment referred above section 10 of the railway protection force act be prescribed by virtue of section 4 of the amending act no 60 of 1985 for the words a force the for the better protection and security of railway property 5 section 2 of the administrative tribunals act 1985 clearly stated as force for the better protection and security of railway property 5 section 2 of the administrative tribunals act 1985 clearly stated

Union of India Vs. Shri Harananda

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... with respect to filling up the posts on deputation reliance has been placed upon section 19 of the railways protection force amendment act 1985 it is submitted that the aforesaid provisions clearly prohibit any deputation to the ..... and or considering the o m no 96 e gr i 16 i dated 8 5 2003 of the dopt government of india as in principle decision for constitution of the rpf .....

Dipak Das & Ors. Vs.uoi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the railway protection force band recruitment and promotion rules 1987 namely 1 act the central government notified rules to be called railway protection force amendment rules 2007 in short the rules 2007 to the powers conferred by section 21 of the railway protection force act 1957 23 of 1957 the central government hereby makes 1 these rules may be called the railway protection force amendment rules 2007 2 they shall come into force on the powers conferred by section 21 of the railway protection force act 1957 23 of 1957 the central government hereby makes the rpf rules 1987 in short the subject rules read with section 8 of the railway protection force act 1957 in short specified in schedule vi annexed to these rules wp c 5657 2010 page 8 of 16 the fact thus remains that

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4263

..... face investigation and trial by the railway protection force it is not made clear how section 160 2 of the act would attract to the facts ..... central government as is envisaged under the provisions of section 179 2 of the railways act amended 2003 it is also pleaded that the manner of ..... reference can be made to s n hussain v state of andhra pradesh 1972crilj496 section 80 i p c provides that nothing is .....

Fancy Babu Vs. Union of India, Represented by General Manager and Othe ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

..... her protection available under section 47 of the disabilities act with effect from 24 4 98 as per annexure a8 did not elicit any response from the railways the disabilities act 1995 came into force on ..... re 3 5 dated 31st july 2001 and e ng 1 2001 re 3 8 dated 1st july 2003 respectively 2 the scheme so revised is being implemented in the railways from the .....

Sports and Leisure Apparel Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2005)(180)ELT429TriDel

2002 in central excise law we do not find any force in this contention explanation to notification no 15 2002 c the notification that it will have retrospective effect and secondly amendment is not of clarificatory nature 5 1 we have considered under the first schedule to the said central excise tariff act and the additional duties of excise goods of special importance subsequent amendment in condition no 4 by notification no 3 2003 will not be applicable for the past period as there in force or the additional duty of customs leviable under section 3 of the customs tariff act 1975 as the case retrospective effect and secondly amendment is not of clarificatory nature 5 1 we have considered the submissions of both the sides