Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: railway companies emergency provisions act 1951 section 9 penalties Page 3 of about 40,715 results (0.340 seconds)

Feb 03 1925 (PC)

Dayton Price and Co. Ltd. Vs. S. Rohomotollah and Co.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1925Cal609

..... was at that time much difficulty in getting the goods in new york. there appears to have been great congestion of goods for export at new york and the railway companies of chicago would not accept deliveries of goods for conveyance to new york.10. messrs. a stein & co, were complaining to the plaintiffs of the congestion in their ..... it was not disputed that if the contract were treated as a contract between the plaintiff's as vendors and the defendants as vendees, the breach of the provision to ship at new york would entitle the defendants to reject the goods.37. it was argued on behalf of the defendants that the contract in this case was ..... prudence would have done in his own case under similar circumstances.28. this argument cannot succeed; for in my opinion, it cannot reasonably be said that such an emergency had arisen as authorised the plaintiffs to act contrary to the express instructions of the defendants.29. it was not suggested that the plaintiffs were unable to communicate with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2015 (HC)

The Krishna District Milk Producers Mutually Aided Co. op Union Vs. Th ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... provisions of the act or the conditions, if any, of exemption granted thereunder, have been complied with or not by the employer. inter-alia the inspector can require an employer to furnish such information as he may consider it necessary or enter and inspect at all reasonable hours any premises of any place in any factory, mine, oil field, plantation, port, railway company ..... of section 7 of the act. section 11 of the act provided for matters of cognizance to be taken of such offences. when all these provisions have been kept in view, it emerges that every employer was required to comply with sub sections 2 and 3 of section 7 on his own without waiting for a formal application to ..... becomes payable to the person to whom the gratuity is payable. therefore, when sub sections 1, 2 and 3 of section 7 of the act are read together it emerges that the employee is entitled to make a formal claim for payment of gratuity, but however, irrespective of the fact whether or not such a claim has been made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2023 (HC)

Sri Basavegowda Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.10872 OF2023(GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI BASAVEGOWDA S/O PAVADIGOWDA AGED ABOUT75YEARS KARADYA VILLAGE NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT PIN CODE 571 431. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI ADAVEESHAIAH B., ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU PIN CODE 560 001. REPRESENTED BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA2PIN CODE 571 401. 3 . DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA PIN CODE 571 401. 4 . THE HEAD MASTER GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL G.MALLIGERE MANDYA TALUK AND DISTRICT PINCODE 571 401. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO THE R-3, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT. MANDYA PIN CODE57140, DIR...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 1868 (FN)

Orient Ins. Co. Vs. Daggs

Court : US Supreme Court

..... a matter of legislative discretion whether the same liability should or should not be applied to other carriers, or to persons and corporations using steam in manufactures. in minneapolis railway company v. beckwith, 129 u. s. 26 , a law of iowa making a class of railroad corporations for special legislation was sustained. 3. "what it is ..... v. mcclung, ante, p. 172 u. s. 239 . 2. it is not easy to make a succinct statement of the objections of plaintiff in error under this provision. counsel says: "the business of insurance includes insurance against damages on account of death, accident, personal injury, liability for acts of employees, damages to plate glass, damages by ..... mines and workings, and in smelters, and all other institutions for the reduction and refining of ores or metals, eight hours per day, except in cases of emergency where life or property should be in imminent danger. the violation of the statute was made a misdemeanor. it was undoubtedly a limitation on the right of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 1934 (FN)

Fairport, Painesville and Eastern R. Co. Vs. Meredith

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and second, and especially in the case of long heavy trains, it did not meet the necessity of stopping the train quickly in emergencies. in this second aspect, the common law duty of the railway company to use ordinary care to provide and keep in reasonably safe condition adequate brakes for the control of its trains was one owing, among ..... crossings. since all of these three classes of persons are within the mischief at which the provision are aimed, it is quite reasonable to interpret the statute imposing the duty as including all of them. it fairly may be said that the nature of the ..... , 243 u. s. 620 ; st. louis, i.m. & s. ry. v. taylor, 210 u. s. 281 , 210 u. s. 295 . to confine the beneficial effect of these provisions to employees and passengers would be to impute to congress an intention to ignore the equally important element which their enactment actually contributes to the safety of travelers at highway .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2005 (HC)

Oil and Natural Gas Commission Vs. Petroleum Employees Union and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR574

..... included therein eonomin, or (ii) any industry is carried on (a) by or under the authority of the central government or, (b) by railway company; or (c) by specified controlled industry, then the central government will be the appropriate government otherwise in relation to any other establishment, the government of ..... wherein the appellants concerned, indisputably are obliged to run the respective canteens in their establishments on account of the obligation cast upon them under the mandatory provisions of the factories act, 1948 and the rules made thereunder.19. in the case of workmen of nilgiri cooperative society, the supreme court stressed that ..... connection with the work entrusted to him by a principal employer, the relationship of master and servant between him (the principal employer) and the contract labour emerges. after the elaborate, extensive and detailed analysis of the precedents holding the field, the constitution bench summarised the legal position thus-(1)(a) before january .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 24 1926 (FN)

Turner Lumber Co. Vs. Chicago, M. and St.P. Ry. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... cars loaded with lumber. p. 271 u. s. 263 . 2 f.2d 292 affirmed. error to a judgment of the district court for the railway company in an action by the lumber company to recover a sum collected under a demurrage tariff. page 271 u. s. 260 mr. justice brandeis delivered the opinion of the court. turner, ..... that imposition of a penalty exceeds the statutory authority conferred upon the commission; that, if the interstate commerce act be construed as conferring such authority, the provision is void because congress is without power to authorize the commission to impose it, since prescribing a penalty is a legislative function which cannot be delegated, and ..... shippers of lumber, there is a denial of equal protection of the laws. the tariff in question provides: "to prevent undue detention of equipment under present emergency, the following additional penalties for detention of equipment will apply:" "on cars loaded with lumber held for reconsignment a storage charge of $10 per car will be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1936 (PC)

Debendra NaraIn Roy Vs. Jogendra NaraIn Deb and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1936Cal593,167Ind.Cas.615

..... another and that in any event it can exercise no such power unless adequate provision is made by it for compensation to the party injured. he has sought to support this contention by reference to certain decisions, amongst which reference may be made to london and north western railway company v. evans (1893) 1 ch 16 and attorney general v. de keyser's ..... in that appeal. the cross-objection relates to the items of properties with regard to which the claim of the plaintiff in the suit out of which that appeal has emerged has been held not hit by the act. the cross-objection has not been filed in the shape of a crossobjection which the code contemplates. but as the grounds are ..... . suit no. 84 of 1930 which has given rise to appeal no. 171 of 1933 and t. suit no. 164 of 1930 from which appeal no. 205 of 1933 has emerged.4. suit no. 84 was instituted on 9th may 1930. the plaintiff in this suit is one debendra narain roy who commenced it describing himself as the sole surviving executor .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1959 (FN)

Steelworkers Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the district judge, in fact, made a discretionary determination, and, if he did, whether that determination was justifiable. we conclude that, under the national emergency provisions of the labor management relations act, it is not for judges to exercise conventional "discretion" to withhold an "eighty-day" injunction upon a balancing of conveniences ..... 13 ] the particularized findings necessary are illustrated by those in united states v. steelworkers, 202 f.2d 132, 134: "at its dunkirk plant, the company was then engaged in commerce and in the production of goods for commerce, primarily in the 'heat exchanger, pressure vessel, and prefabricated pipe industry;' the threatened ..... production of particular complexes of plants be regulated? what of problems of cost and overhead, and the cost of and time required for intra-company planning to determine the practicality of partially restricting the operation of giant complexes such as those of the major producers? no doubt a district court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 2001 (HC)

H.V. Thimmegowda and Others Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3156; [2002(94)FLR928]; ILR2001KAR3683; 2001(4)KarLJ548

..... means.- (i) in relation to an establishment belonging to, or under the control of, the central government or in relation to an establishment connected with a railway company, a major port, a mine or an oilfield or a controlled industry or in relation to an establishment having departments or branches in more than one state, the ..... force. that apart, under the economic offences (inapplicability of limitation) act, 1974.(central act no. 12 of 1974), in respect of economic offences, the provisions of chapter xxxvi of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 do not apply to certain offences which are enumerated in the schedule as follows:'the schedule 1. ..... 1947); 15. the indian stamp act, 1899 (2 of 1899); 16. the emergency risks (goods) insurance act, 1962 (62 of 1962); 17. the emergency risks (factories) insurance act, 1962 (63 of 1962); 18. the emergency risks (goods) insurance act, 1971 (50 of 1971); 19. the emergency risks (undertakings) insurance act, 1971 (51 of 1971); 20. the general .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //