Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: railway companies emergency provisions act 1951 section 9 penalties Page 9 of about 40,715 results (0.333 seconds)

Mar 19 2003 (HC)

Ganesh Kisanrao Mahalle Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR1052; 2004(1)BomCR458; 2003(3)MhLj843

..... submitted by eight members of the said samiti. the said requisition was submitted on 3-3-2003 itself. it is the contention of the petitioner that considering the provisions of section 72 of the maharashtra zilla parishad and panchayat samitis act, 1961, hereinafter called as 'the said act', the collector has no authority, either to postpone ..... result would follow. take a case where the bar council may have fixed dates for holding elections, but due to natural calamities like earthquake, floods or grave emergencies such as the country may be at war, the election program cannot be adhered to, in that situation the bar council may consider it necessary to change the ..... thereat.' 10. the said decision of the division bench was challenged in the said appeal of jayantibhai patel's case before the apex court, after considering the provisions of section 19 and section 453 of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949 as well as section 21 of the bombay general clauses act, 1904 it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 2016 (SC)

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the way in which dr. ambedkar look at it. according to me, these rights of trade and commerce and intercourse should be absolute and only circumscribed by provisions relating to emergencies while in his view, the power of the central government as well as of the provincial governments should be there, and these rights should be qualified we ..... india or sold to the government of india for consumption by the government or for consumption of the construction, maintenance or operation of any railway by the government of india or a rail company etc. similarly, article 288 contains a constitutional limitation on the power of the state in so far as imposition of a tax in respect ..... or air, taxes on railway fares and freights . while there are variations in the operational form of taxes under entry 52, essentially these constitute a levy on entry of goods into a local area for sale, consumption or use therein. under an entry tax regime, a company, trading firm or an individual would be liable to pay .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 02 1952 (FN)

Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. Vs. Sawyer

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 12275. just before the paragraph quoted in the text, senator ives had said: "in fact, the courts have upheld the constitutionality of the national emergency provisions of the labor-management relations act of 1947, which can require that workers stay on the job for at least 80 days when a strike would ..... 24/45 8/25/45 9493. tit. viii, revenue act of 1943. refusal to deliver items at "fair and reasonable designees of secretary of navy operated company for 9 fed.reg. 12860. 9, selective service act of 1940 as prices" fixed by the secretary of the navy in con- duration of war. ..... railroads and telegraph lines 4/27/61 (?) order of secretary of war dated 4/27/61 none. communications between washington and northern troops guarded railway and tele- between washington and appointing thomas a. scott officer in the north were interrupted by bands of graph facilities; they were repaired and annapolis .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 1919 (PC)

The Dekhari Tea Coy, Ld. Vs. the Assam Bengal Railway Company, Ld.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 57Ind.Cas.406

..... journeys out of the avocation of a common carrier. on the whole i think it was not. as i read the correspondence in 1913, the railway company in the emergency appealed to the steamship company to carry in the exercise of their public and ordinary profession. can you take chittagong tea from gauhati to chandpur and what charge per chest?' ..... the goods should be carried all the way to chittagong in consideration of one single and entire reward to the railway company in that behalf. the arrangement between the companies in 1913 was an emergency arrangement to enable the railway company to continue to do, for its assam customers, what it ordinarily did by its own hands. the goods when put ..... clearly enough the size of the aggregate consignment and the fact that much of it would be for shipment made special provision necessary this, however, is not exacted by the railway. it is pointed cut by the steamship company but, as i think, it is not made the basis of the contract in snob a way as to show .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 1961 (FN)

Machinists Vs. Street

Court : US Supreme Court

..... coerce employees to join a company union, or require employees to join or refrain from joining a labor organization. the emergency railroad transportation act of june 16, 1933, 48 stat. 214, 7(e), required all carriers to abide by these provisions of the bankruptcy act. the latter provision was temporary, with a ..... justice frankfurter, whom mr. justice harlan joins, dissenting. appellant unions were the collective bargaining representatives of the "nonoperating" employees of the southern railway. appellees, six individual railway employees, commenced this action in the superior court of bibb county, georgia, seeking a declaration of invalidity and an injunction to prevent enforcement of ..... between authorization and compulsion. s.rep. no. 2262, 81st cong., 2d sess. 2. and this court, in hanson, noted that "the union shop provision of the railway labor act is only permissive. congress has not . . . required carriers and employees to enter into union shop agreements." 351 u.s. at 351 u .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 1930 (FN)

Texas and New Orleans R. Co. Vs. Brotherhood of Ry. Clerks

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to restrain page 281 u. s. 566 either party to the controversy from changing the existing status during the sixty-day period provided for the emergency board. [ footnote 3 ]" the provision of 10 is to be read in connection with the qualification in subdivision eighth of 9 that nothing in the act shall be construed to ..... (1930) u.s. supreme court texas & new orleans r. co. v. brotherhood of ry. clerks, 281 u.s. 548 (1930) texas & new orleans railroad company v. brotherhood of railway & steamship clerks no. 469 argued may 1, 2, 1930 decided may 26, 1930 281 u.s. 548 certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the fifth circuit ..... the allegations of the bill of complaint was that the brotherhood, since its organization in september, 1918, had been authorized by a majority of the railway clerks in the employ of the railroad company (apart from general office employees) to represent them in all matters relating to their employment; that this representation was recognized by the railroad .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1994 (HC)

Hindustan Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1995(80)ELT493(Raj); 1994(1)WLC464; 1994(1)WLN70

..... duty from the petitioner on the basis of the value of rails supplied by the railway boards to the petitioner in respect of the period prior to 1-4-1981.2. the petitioner is a limited company incorporated under the provisions of the indian companies act, 1956 and its head office and registered office are at calcutta. the ..... the value of which is included in the fabrication charges in accordance with the aforementioned contract. thus, no new article known to the trade emerges after the rails supplied by the railway board are subjected to the aforementioned process by the petitioner. the govt. of india in exercise of the powers conferred upon it under rule ..... undergone the intended manufacturing process. whether it will acquire a different commodity and it will be known as different article in the commercial market or it will emerge as a new article. all these connotations are not in the explanation but they are artificially placed by the authority to frustrate the intended purpose for which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2013 (SC)

Rajendra Nagar Adarsh Grah Nirman S.S.Ld Vs. State of Rajasthan and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... understanding, namely, executive power vested in the central government cannot be exercised in violation of the constitutional provisions referred to above, or as may be ordained by some express legislative enactment. the latter aspect (express legislative enactment), emerges from the proviso under article 73(1) of the constitution of india. therefore, on a subject regulated ..... considering the report, if any, made under section 5a, sub-section (2), that any particular land is needed for a public purpose, or for a company, a declaration shall be made to that effect under the signature of a secretary to such government or of some officer duly authorised to certify its orders ..... (emphasis is ours) according to the learned counsel for the appellants, in the case in hand, the purpose of acquisition was purely relatable to the railways. and the railways being exclusively a union subject (falling under entry 22 in list i, of the seventh schedule), the process of acquisition must be deemed to fall in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 1899 (FN)

Northern Pacific Railroad Co. Vs. Freeman

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in the circuit court for the district of washington against the receiver of the northern pacific railroad company and subsequently, after the discharge of the receiver, continued against the northern pacific railway company, purchaser at the foreclosure sale, which, by virtue of the provisions of the decree of sale, had assumed the liabilities of the receiver. the object of the action ..... of the excavation on either side of the highway; but at a distance of about forty page 174 u. s. 382 feet before reaching the track the road emerged from the cut, and the view up the track for about 300 feet was unobstructed. at the time of the accident, freeman was driving along the highway, going ..... driving down until he had reached a point about forty feet from it. freeman was driving a pair of horses in a farm wagon down this descent. when he emerged from the cut and reached the point from which an approaching train was visible, he was looking ahead at his horses. a train was coming up. the conductor, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1917 (FN)

Wilson Vs. New

Court : US Supreme Court

..... congress under the commerce clause. the power to establish an eight-hour day does not beget the power to fix wages. in an emergency arising from a nationwide dispute over wages between railroad companies and their train operatives, in which a general strike, commercial paralysis, and grave loss and suffering overhang the country because the disputants ..... the quality of railroad locomotives, a law requiring the companies to pay 25% more than before for each locomotive, without stipulating for any improvement in the quality, would be absurdly ineffective. equally futile, as a measure for improvement of the quality of railway supplies, would be a provision of law compelling the roads to pay 25% more ..... true in fact is immaterial in law. it amounts to no more than saying that it was page 243 u. s. 377 enacted to take care of an emergency. but an emergency can neither create a power nor excuse a defiance of the limitations upon the powers of the government. ex parte milligan, 4 wall. 2, 71 u. s .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //