Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: railway claims tribunal act 1987 chapter 1 preliminary Page 14 of about 86,448 results (0.397 seconds)

The Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Ram Lakhan Singh

Court : Patna

..... years old boy died. the sole respondent filed claim application under the indian railways act, 1989 before the railway claims tribunal, patna bench.2. the tribunal rejected the same on 15.12.1990, holding that the claimant was not dependent. he filed misc. appeal no. 27 of 1991 under section 23 of the railways claims tribunal act, 1987 before this court, wherein the tribunal's order was quashed and the matter was ..... remitted back to it for fresh consideration. this time by the impugned order dated 15.1.1997, the tribunal directed the railways to pay rs. 2 lakhs to ram lakhan singh, gulabo devi, master master .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Smt. Nalini Parida

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2009Ori56

..... j.1. this is an appeal under section 23 of the railway claims tribunal act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') filed by the union of india represented through the general manager, east coast railway, chandrasekharpur, bhubaneswar, challenging the award dated 26-9-2005 patted by the railway claims tribunal, bhubaneswar bench in o.a. no. 70 of 2004 whereby ..... @ of 5%.2. the brief facts of the case are as follows:the claimant-respondent filed o.a. no. 70 of 2004 before the railway claims tribunal, bhubaneswar bench claiming com pensation from the appellant on the ground that on 29-1-2003, the claimant after visiting her cousin sister's house returned from khurda road ..... claimed, to the date of institution of foe proceedings.11. therefore, from the above provision of the interest act read with the definition of the 'court' as defined in section 2(a) of the interest act read with section 34 of the civil procedure code it is clear that the court can grant interest. as the railway tribunal .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. the Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd.

Court : Patna

..... consignor or the consignee on account of short delivery.8. the impugned order/judgment of the railway claims tribunal was further assailed with respect to grant of litigation cost. in this connection, section 18(3) of the railway claims tribunal act, 1987 was referred to and it was submitted that the tribunal's power to use the provisions of the code of civil procedure was limited to the ..... be guided by the principles of natural justice, moreover, the tribunal shall also be guided by other provisions of this act (railway claims tribunal act) and the rules made thereunder. none of the provisions of this act or the rules made thereunder has debarred the claims tribunal from granting litigation cost. so if the tribunal granted the litigation cost, i do not think it was beyond its jurisdiction or that .....

Standard Chartered Bank Through Its Authorised Officer Vs. Virendra Ra ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

..... 342 (nc), it was held that since it was not disputed that untoward incident as mentioned in section 124-a of the act has occurred the proper forum of adjudication would only be before the railway claim tribunal under section 15 of the railway claims tribunal act, 1987. the consumer court had no jurisdiction in this respect. 11. the consumer court cannot deal with the directions given to ..... a company declared sick by bifr. 12. in dineshkumar vs. railway station master, raipur station, iv (2004) cpj 136 (chhattisgarh), it was held that .....

Arthamudi Ramu and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ1659; 2006(5)ALD243

..... , where a cause, which may appear to be the one under tort, may, have the elements of an express or implied contract. for instance, the railway claims tribunal act, not only provides for the procedure for adjudication of claims, but also stipulates the amount, to be awarded in the event of death or bodily injury to the passengers, who became the victims, in an untoward ..... , j.1. this appeal is filed under section 23 of the railway claims tribunal act, assailing the order, dated 17-10-2005, in o.a.a. no. 229 of 1999 passed by the railway claims tribunal, secunderabad bench. it raises an important question of law viz., whether the proceedings instituted before the tribunal by an individual, claiming damages for the injuries received by him in an untoward incident or .....

D.B. Avalakki and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : II(2000)ACC764; 2001ACJ1258; AIR2000Kant269; ILR2000KAR1613; 2000(4)KarLJ237

..... without jurisdiction.24. we have accepted the above objection on being satisfied that in view of sections 18(3)(i) and 30(2)(f) of the tribunal act and rule 32 of the railways claims tribunal rules, 1989, the tribunal has no power or substantive review of the order passed by it. anyhow, since in the present appeal, apprehending the said consequence, the appellants have specifically ..... thereof or for refund of any freight paid in respect of animals or goods entrusted to a railway administration to be carried by railway. (1-a) the claims tribunal shall also exercise, on and from the date of commencement of the provisions of section 124-a of the railways act, 1989, all such jurisdiction, powers and authority as were exercisable immediately before that date by any .....

C.J. Thomas and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2009Ker94; 2009(1)KLJ373

..... ,00,000/-. while the suit was pending in that court, section 124a was introduced in the railways act, 1989 (for short, 'the act') by the railway amendment act 28 of 1994 with effect from 1-8-1994. section 13(ia) was introduced in the railway claims tribunal act (for short, 'the tribunal act') by the same act also effect from 1 -8-1994. learned sub judge, quilandy found that in view of ..... that amendment, jurisdiction to entertain the claim is vested with the tribunal and accordingly, transferred the case to 36 the tribunal. tribunal received the file on 19-9-2001. respondent before the .....

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Amtek Geophysical Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 115(2004)DLT624

..... all of which are imbued with plain and sound commonsense. in a.a. haja muniuddian vs. indian railways : air1993sc361 the apex court had before it section 18 of railways claims tribunal act, which provides in its first sub-section that the tribunal shall not be bound by the procedure laid down by the code, but shall be guided by the ..... principles of natural justice and shall have power to regulate its own procedure. the court observed that - 'nowhere in the act is there any ..... that on a reading of section 43 the same position obtains under the 1996 act. however, there is no gainsaying that the counter-claim cannot be filed in respect of a claim that has become time-barred. so far as the claims before the arbitral tribunal are concerned, time started to run on 28.10.1996 when the respondent sought .....

Smt. Vidyawati Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

..... reported in the digest?1. this appeal arises out of an order dated 18.02.2008 passed by the railway claims tribunal, principal bench, delhi, (hereinafter referred to as "the tribunal"), whereby the learned tribunal has dismissed the claim of the appellant filed under section 16 of the railway claims tribunal act for payment of compensation on account of death of sh. vijay kumar, who was admittedly a bona fide ..... the respondent to prove that anybody saw the passenger travelling in the train negligently so as to bring his conduct in the exceptions provided for under section 124a of the railway claims tribunal act. in these circumstances, considering the law laid down by the apex court in the case of jameela & ors. (supra), the order passed by the .....

Karri Nagamani and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ1214; AIR2007AP241; 2007(4)ALD404

..... civil miscellaneous appeal is filed under section 23 of railway claims tribunal act by the claimants, aggrieved by the order made in oaa no. 139 of 2000 on the file of the railway claims tribunal, secunderabad bench at secunderabad.2. the union of india represented by its general manager, south central railway, secunderabad is the respondent.3. the appellants- ..... , and(v) the nature of the treatment given by the medical officer who has examined the victim.no such rule has been framed under the railway claims tribunal (procedure) rules. had such rule been framed; there is no difficulty to look into contents of fir and inquest report. the fir can be ..... .l. rw.l the deputy station superintendent, elamanchili and also cw.l, the investigating officer, had made their statements.5. the railway claims tribunal (hereinafter in short referred to as 'tribunal' for the purpose of convenience) on the respective pleadings of the parties, after settling the issues, recorded findings and made a general .....