Quantification - Year 1981 - Judgments

Feb 26 1981 (SC)

Corporation of the City of Nagpur, Civil Lines, Nagpur and Another Vs. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-26-1981

Reported in: AIR1984SC626; (1981)83BOMLR536; [1981(43)FLR78]; 1984LabIC179; (1981)IILLJ6SC; 1981(1)SCALE503; (1981)2SCC714; [1981]3SCR22; 1981(13)LC316(SC)

..... after the other dispute relating to interpretation of terms of agreement by arbitrator concerning the quantification of cost of construction held it does not amount to re writing of terms of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 1981 (HC)

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Mafatlal Fine Spinning and Weaving Compa ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-06-1981

Reported in: [1981]48STC316(Bom)

..... correct in law in coming to the conclusion that a precise quantification of the tax is not possible thereunder and therefore that ..... 41 as pointed out earlier for the purposes of assessment and quantification of tax the sales and purchases of a particular class ..... of which admittedly there is no difficulty in working out the quantification assuming the tribunal felt in respect of any particular entry .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 12 1981 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Santi Devi and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-12-1981

Reported in: (1981)25CTR(Cal)42,[1983]139ITR489(Cal)

..... compensation and such interest is payable for the period between the two events indicated above quantification of interest is dependent upon what the compensation ultimately turns out to be it the ..... quantified the right to receive interest was not contingent but absolute the amount thereof awaited quantification thus in respect of the assessee there was a debitum in praesenti and the solvendum .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 15 1981 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ramanlal Kamdar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-15-1981

Reported in: [1987]169ITR802(Mad)

..... the assessed tax for every month during which the default continues the quantification of the penalty on the basis of every month s default ..... default can be said to be unreasonable can there be a quantification of penalty at the rate of 2 of the assessed tax ..... by the assessee only to three months it follows therefore that the quantification of the penalty was made by the tribunal on very correct .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 08 1981 (HC)

Macneill and Magor Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-08-1981

Reported in: [1983]141ITR521(Cal)

..... to settle the formula i e the basis of liability and it was not mere quantification of the liability which was to be done the decision of the tribunal in i ..... the formula that is the basis of the liability and it was not a mere quantification of the liability according to the tribunal which was to be done and on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 1981 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation Lt ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-02-1981

Reported in: [1982]138ITR111(Cal)

..... have to be regarded as provision made for a known and existing liability and the quantification whereof had to be done later the taxing authorities and the tribunal were therefore clearly ..... would have to be regarded as a provision made for a known contingent liability the quantification whereof was to depend upon either the actual award that would be made by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 1981 (TRI)

E.C. Bose and Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-23-1981

Reported in: (1982)2ITD149(Kol.)

..... v mackinnon mackenzie p ltd air 1968 bom 328 dr pal further urged that the quantification of the compensation payable in accordance with section 19 of the 1923 act will not ..... totalling rs 7 56 236 even though that liability could not be enforced till the quantification was effected consequent to the awards by the commissioner under section 19 of the 1923 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 07 1981 (SC)

Ahmed Ibrahim Sahigra Dhoraji Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-07-1981

Reported in: AIR1981SC1562; (1981)21CTR(SC)356; [1981]129ITR314(SC); 1981(1)SCALE694; (1981)3SCC77; [1981]3SCR402

..... is chargeable to tax without allowing usual deductions and without providing for any procedure for quantification 12 the high court proceeded to hold that section 68 enacted a new charge of ..... income to tax is not dependent upon the passing of the finance act though its quantification may be governed by the provisions of the finance act in respect of any assessment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 1981 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Vs. C. Shantilala and Co.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Sep-01-1981

Reported in: [1982]136ITR522(Guj)

..... liable to pay the tax and under such circumstance the provisions with regard to the quantification of penalty was rendered inapplicable the decision in cit v vegetable products ltd was therefore ..... s 271 1 a i and the controversy between the parties was confined to the quantification and levy of penalty on the basis of the tax payable as a registered firm .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 29 1981 (HC)

R. Srinivasan Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-1981

Reported in: (1982)IILLJ135Mad

..... demand for payment of rent we think not before making a demand there should he quantification of rent payable when the monthly tariff rate has not been fixed and no ..... quantification of rent or bill was issued to the appellant how can there be demand for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Quantification - Judgment Search Results