Qualified - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: qualified Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.023 seconds)Southeastern Commun. Coll. Vs. Davis
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-11-1979
..... legitimate physical requirements in order to be otherwise qualified an otherwise qualified person is one who is able to meet ..... by congress in all other respects the terms qualified and otherwise qualified are intended to be interchangeable 45 cfr pt ..... continuing past requirements and practices might arbitrarily deprive genuinely qualified handicapped persons of the opportunity to participate in a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRose Vs. Mitchell
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-02-1979
..... of fourteenth amendment interests to criminal prosecutions under 243 and civil actions instituted by such qualified negroes this position for the first time has attracted the support of additional members ..... nonexistent but there are of course other interests implicated when a state systematically excludes qualified negroes from grand jury service such page 443 u s 578 discrimination denies negroes .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Vickers Sperry of India
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-1979
Reported in: (1983)3ITD739(Mum.)
..... in uk was of the view that assets representing capital expenditure on scientific research qualified for depreciation and that depreciation should not be allowed thereon because of a different ..... research depreciable assets represented by capital expenditure on scientific research related to the business qualified for wear and tear allowance since however the legislature intended not to allow wear .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew York City Transit Auth. Vs. Beazer
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-21-1979
..... employees receiving methadone treatment more particularly it tells us nothing about the class of otherwise qualified applicants and employees who have participated in methadone maintenance page 440 u s 586 ..... that the figures for the general population might not accurately reflect the pool of qualified job applicants undermines the significance of such figures teamsters v united states supra at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTillinois State Bd. of Elections Vs. Socialist Workers Party
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-22-1979
..... election code new political parties and independent candidates must obtain the signatures of 25 000 qualified voters in order to appear on the ballot in statewide elections however the minimum ..... right of individuals to associate for the advancement of political beliefs and the right of qualified voters regardless of their political persuasion to cast their votes effectively williams v rhodes supra .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPersonnel Adm'r of Massachusetts Vs. Feeney
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-05-1979
..... or an absolute preference for a limited duration would reward veterans without excluding all qualified women from upper level civil service positions apart from public employment the commonwealth can ..... 104 sex based restrictions on advancement and training opportunities also diminished the incentives for qualified women to enlist see binkin and bach 117 beans sex discrimination in the military .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. Kantnimathi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary t ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-06-1979
Reported in: (1979)2MLJ316
orderv ramaswani j 1 the petitioner was directly recruited to the administrative section of the then women s branch of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-04-1979
Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;
..... vagarious v in rajendra prasad the majority has held that such extraordinary grounds alone constitutionally qualify as special reasons as leave no option to the court but to execute the offender ..... if state and society are to survive one stroke of murder hardly qualifies for this drastic requirement however gruesome the killing or pathetic the situation unless the inherent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChhotey Lal Pandey and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-02-1979
Reported in: AIR1979All135
to exclude admission to higher educational centres to deserving and qualified candidates of other communities a special provision contemplated by article
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew York Tel. Co. Vs. New York Dept. of Labor
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-21-1979
..... regard to their unemployment compensation laws expressly referred to the new york statute as a qualifying example footnote 37 even though that reference did not mention the subject of benefits for ..... more specific claim that involuntary unemployment must be the key to eligibility under title ix qualified programs footnote 29 indeed study of the various provisions cited shows that when congress wished .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial