Proxy - Judgment Search Results

State (Delhi Administration) Vs. Master Tameej

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1974CriLJ100; 9(1973)DLT324; 1973RLR302

prakash narain j 1 this is an appeal by the state delhi administration against the order of acquittal passed by...

Niamat Bi Vs. S.L. Dhani Etc.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1974RLR413

prakash narain j 1 by this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india the petitioner challenges order dated...

Pritam Singh Vs. Parmeshwari Devi Etc.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1974RLR257

prakash narain j 1 one rattan singh and asa singh were owners of suit property they had taken plot on...

Shor Shot Ammunition Manufacturers, New Delhi Vs. Union of India and o ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 10(1974)DLT46

prakash narain j 1 the petitioner claims itself to be a registered pertnership carrying on business in the union territoly...

Paris Adult theatre I Vs. Slaton

Court: US Supreme Court

paris adult theatre i v slaton 413 u s 49 1973 u s supreme court paris adult theatre i v...

In Re: Jalpaiguri Tea Co. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1974]44CompCas335(Cal)

..... co ltd was attended by ten ordinary shareholders in person and thirteen ordinary shareholders by proxy and or through their authorised representatives and the total number of their shareholdings was ..... 1972 and was attended by twenty ordinary shareholders in person and eight ordinary shareholders by proxy or through their authorised representative and the total number of their shareholdings was 18 .....

Csc Vs. Letter Carriers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... advertisement a broadcast campaign literature or similar material 11 serving as a delegate alternate or proxy to a political party convention 12 addressing a convention caucus rally or similar gathering of ..... he were openly a participant 13 conventions candidacy for or service as delegate alternate or proxy in any political convention or service as an officer or employee thereof is prohibited .....

Hall Vs. Cole

Court: US Supreme Court

..... suit brought to set aside a corporate merger accomplished through the use of a misleading proxy statement in violation of 14 a of the securities exchange act of 1934 4 stat ..... c 78n a in reaching this result we reasoned that since the dissemination of misleading proxy solicitations jeopardized important interests of both the corporation and the stockholders as a group footnote .....

CBS Vs. Democratic Nat'l Committee

Court: US Supreme Court

..... broadcast licensees are granted use of part of the public domain and are regulated as proxies or fiduciaries of the people 146 u s app d c at 191 450 f ..... engaged in a symbiotic relationship with the licensee profiting from the invidious discrimination of its proxy compare moose lodge no 107 v irvis 407 u s 163 407 u s 174 .....

Kern County Land Co. Vs. Occidental Petr. Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... number of circumstances the most significant being that the optionor gave the optionee an irrevocable proxy to vote the shares and that the optionor and one of his associate directors resigned ..... and forfeited in the event of nonexercise in addition defendants gave the optionee an irrevocable proxy with respect to the optioned stock and defendant mcdonough and his colleagues resigned from the .....