Proxy Contest - Judgment Search Results

Piper Vs. Chris-craft Industries, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... was patterned after 14 a which regulates page 430 u s 58 proxy contests footnote 3 7 it is clear that a shareholder may recover in ..... committee reports refer to the cash tender offer as similar to a proxy contest footnote 3 8 in mills v electric auto lite co 396 u ..... footnote 3 12 page 430 u s 61 in both proxy and tender offer contests the remedy which will most effectively deter violations of the .....

Alleghany Corp. Vs. Breswick and Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reposes in alleghany and its officers as a result of a proxy contest preceding a stockholders meeting of may 26 1954 at which ..... commission points out the problem would appear clearer were alleghany contesting rather than acquiescing in its jurisdiction control in fact then ..... 125 307 u s 144 where the fact that the contested order determining the status of the rochester necessarily and immediately .....

K.P. Chackochan and anr. Vs. Federal Bank and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1989]66CompCas953(Ker)

..... announce the results but in view of the various allegations regarding the collection of proxies by the contesting parties and particularly the complaint of the plaintiff the arguments were heard along with ..... enabled the fourth respondent who is one of the contestants to deposit the proxies he had collected including from those who had originally given proxies to the petitioners at 10 a m on .....

Kishore Y. Patel and Others Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1992Bom114; [1994]79CompCas53(Bom)

..... meeting could not be directed to carry on correspondence with shareholders who had given proxies and the contesting defendants could not be expected to agree to issue any special directions by the ..... in this view of the situation the plaintiffs are unnecessarily trying to malign the contesting defendants as the proxies of the later date in favour of the plaintiffs group are bound to .....

Sukaram Developer (Pvt.) Ltd. Through Managing Director, Gauri Shankar ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2005(1)ARC664

..... said proceedings is of no consequence it has also been asserted that this is proxy litigation being contested by ram swaroop and entire dakhalnama etc are collusive and thus execution is permitted .....

Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. Vs. V.K. Goel and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1987Delhi260

..... right to defend the suit and his remedy is confined only to contest the plaintiff s case on the his own evidence without being given ..... because as a consequence of the order the plaintiff has how to contest the suit and is deprived of the fruits of the decree ..... obtain copies of the proxies or the signatures or the writings thereon 9 mr p p malhotra learned counsel for the contesting respondent no 1 has .....

Kunwar Brij Bhushan Vs. Dehradun Tea Company Ltd. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1982]52CompCas271(All)

..... to be regarded as final and binding on all the contesting candidates it followed by necessary implication that the sub committee ..... injunction restraining the subcommittee from taking into consideration these proxies the rejected proxies were in any case adjudged valid by the ..... after fhe sub committee proceeded to obtain the votes of proxies adjudged valid the plaintiff applicant filed the present suit .....

Delhi and District Cricket Association Vs. Rajnish Aggarwal and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... as respondent no 3 who has filed his written statement and contested the correctness of the cctv footage similarly report was called for ..... which the said respondents were not permitted to cast their 99 proxy votes which they were having with them and this materially impacted ..... not have been elected on account of casting of these 99 proxies have been declared to have been elected accordingly the trial .....

Delhi and District Cricket Association Vs. Rajnish Aggarwal and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... as respondent no 3 who has filed his written statement and contested the correctness of the cctv footage similarly report was called for ..... which the said respondents were not permitted to cast their 99 proxy votes which they were having with them and this materially impacted ..... not have been elected on account of casting of these 99 proxies have been declared to have been elected accordingly the trial .....

Ravinder Manchanda and ors. Vs. Rajnish Aggarwal and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... as respondent no 3 who has filed his written statement and contested the correctness of the cctv footage similarly report was called for ..... which the said respondents were not permitted to cast their 99 proxy votes which they were having with them and this materially impacted ..... not have been elected on account of casting of these 99 proxies have been declared to have been elected accordingly the trial .....