Protestator - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: protestator Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 172 results (0.009 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Official Trustee of West Bengal (for th ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-05-1981
Reported in: (1981)23CTR(Cal)276,[1983]139ITR1(Cal)
sudhindra mohan guha j 1 this reference relates to the assessment years 1952 53 1953 54 1955 56 1956 57...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Radhakanta Deb and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Hindu Religious Endowm ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-13-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC798; 51(1981)CLT495(SC); 1981(1)SCALE304; (1981)2SCC226; [1981]2SCR826; 1981(13)LC671(SC)
fazal ali j this appeal by certificate granted under art 133 of the constitution is directed against a division bench...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWasiuddIn Ahmed Vs. District Magistrate, Aligarh, U.P. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-16-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC2166; 1981CriLJ1825; 1981(3)SCALE1629; (1981)4SCC521
a p sen j 1 this is a petition under article 32 of the constitution by one wasiuddin ahmed for...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrij Basi Lal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-14-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1384; 1981CriLJ1032; (1981)3SCC584
..... and the unreason able restriction on their fundamental rights under art 19 1 f they protested against the order of forfeiture not only out of court but in court and only ..... coercion the period of limitation for a suit against government to recover money paid under protest is governed either by art 16 or art 62 of the limitation act 1908 that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatpal Vs. Hiralal
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-25-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1738; (1981)3SCC127
..... bills and verified claims of respondents before issuing direction to make payment there was no protest order of shortages by third party or recipient held appellants could not have withheld payment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Aluminium Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and an ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-28-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1649; 1983(13)ELT1656(SC); 1981(3)SCALE1130; (1981)3SCC578; [1982]1SCR129; [1981]48STC411(SC); 1981(13)LC605(SC)
..... in the kuttikenam area in the peermade hills in kerala state the company paid without protest the additional tax levied on plantation by act 17 of 1960 when the rate became .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShaik HussaIn and Sons Vs. M.G. Kannaiah and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-12-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1725; (1981)3SCC71; 1981(13)LC281a(SC)
..... made with permission of the central government bearing in mind that the maxim delegates non protest delegable sets out what is merely a rule of construction subdelegation can be sustained if .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.S. Dhanoa Vs. Municipal Corporation, Delhi and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-08-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1395; 1981CriLJ871; [1981(43)FLR272]; (1981)IILLJ230SC; (1981)IILLJ231SC; 1981(1)SCALE919; (1981)3SCC431; [1981]3SCR864; 1981(13)LC803(SC)
..... within the 4th quarter of the concerned year the appellant then filed his returns under protest and contended that the assessment proceedings were barred by limitation under s 11 a of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRosewell Vs. LaSalle Nat'l Bank
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-24-1981
..... for federal court jurisdiction here the second that overassessment continues notwithstanding the taxpayer s formal protests and the manifest error in the original assessment ibid would appear to require error ..... the overassessment of respondent s property was repeated year after year notwithstanding her formal protests and the manifest error in the original assessment it is apparent that the county .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohammad Usman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-20-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Raj100
..... full satisfaction of the claim was given by the appellants the appellants after some initial protests agreed and duly discharged all the promissory notes by endorsing thereon full payment and satisfaction ..... the refund appears to have been accepted unconditionally by the petitioner without any demur or protest after the unilateral rescission of the contract was made by the railway authorities and the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial