Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of women from domestic violence act 2005 Court: kerala Page 8 of about 75 results (0.067 seconds)

Jan 31 2013 (HC)

Gopakumar Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... apart from the same, m.c.no.2/2008 was filed against the petitioner and others under section 12 of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 and she has also sought for divorce by filing o.p.no.729/2008 before the family court, kozhikode. ..... i.a.no.1245/2011 in o.p.no.729/2008 is a joint petition filed under section 13b of the hindu marriage act mutually agreeing to dissolve the marriage before the family court, kozhikode and the court dissolved the marriage by order dated 30/06/2011.3. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2013 (HC)

Joykutty Vs. State

Court : Kerala

..... the offences alleged are under sections 326 and 188 of the ipc and under section 31(1) of the protection of women from domestic violence act. ..... 2.the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him or her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2013 (HC)

Mini.K.N. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... .ramesh babu, who is a police officer has been restrained by exhibit r3(j) and r3(k) orders passed by the judicial first class magistrate - ii, kanjirappilly under the provisions of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005. ..... the report that the second respondent appears to have obtained from the third respondent is to the effect that the petitioner has been residing in kozhikode district for the past 20 years in connection with her ..... exhibits r3(j) and r3(k) protection orders have been passed in favour of the sister- in-law of the ..... the said person is also restrained from creating any obstruction to the petitioner's sister- in-law in taking income from an item of property comprised in sy.no.318(318/46/a) block no.26 of -:8:- ..... as per exhibit r3(k), the said person has been restrained from entering house no.21, ward no.viii of the mundakayam gramapanchayat. ..... also notice that an enquiry has been conducted as evident from the statements obtained, produced as exhibits r3(a) to exhibit r3(e) ..... per exhibit r3(j), the right of the sister- in- law of the petitioner to reside in her matrimonial house has been protected. ..... 782 of 2013-w considered by the said authority, after obtaining a report from the secretary of the panchayat. ..... her appearance, the electoral registration officer who is the tahsildar, kanjirappilly required the petitioner to produce a residential certificate from the third respondent panchayat. ..... statements were obtained from the petitioner's mother as well as sister .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2013 (HC)

Najmunnissa P.A. Vs. Superintendent of Police, Kasaragod

Court : Kerala

..... the petitioner has already approached the judicial first class magistrate court, hosdurg invoking the provisions of the protection of women from domestic violence act and the code of criminal procedure for various reliefs. ..... ideally, the petitioner should move the competent court under the provisions of the guardians and wards act for getting the custody of the child. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2013 (HC)

Anilkumar Vs. Sub Inspector of Police

Court : Kerala

..... it is alleged that the 3rd respondent has filed ext.p1 application under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005. ..... it is alleged that respondents 1 and 2 are threatening the petitioner and his father and are interfering in the matrimonial dispute and directing them to act according to their directions. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2013 (HC)

Daniel Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... ------------------------------------------ crl.m.c.no.2998 of 2013 ------------------------------------------- dated this the 19th day of july, 2013 order the petitioner is the sole accused in crime no.94 of 2013 of thannithode police station, where the offence involved is under section 31(1) of the protection of women from domestic violence act. ..... if any legal proceeding issued from the court below is pending, it is for him to convince that court from where the proceeding is issued, the reason for his absence during previous proceedings and agitate about the non-service of annexure-3 order, etc. ..... annexure-6:true copy of the discharge certificate issued from mgm muthoot medical centre dated 18 06.2013. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2013 (HC)

Jasmine Vs. Najeem

Court : Kerala

..... 68/2010 on the file of the judicial first class magistrate court-ii,kollam, which is an application filed under section 22 of protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005. ..... the petitioner also filed another petition dated under section 233 of the act for keeping the maintenance and minor child. ..... copy marked for references as annexure-a5 to a8 as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a period of two months from the date of copy of the order. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2014 (HC)

Radhakrishnan.C.R Vs. Ani Mol

Court : Kerala

..... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - crl.m.c.no.2926 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 14th day of july, 2014 order the petitioner was the respondent in m.c.no.30/2012 on the file of the judicial first class magistrate court-i, mavelikkara filed under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act. ..... he allowed the petition for condonation of delay on condition that the petitioner should deposit rs.2,00,000/- within one month from the date of the order. ..... regard to the facts of the case, i think it is just and proper to allow the delay condonation petition if the petitioner deposits in the court of the learned magistrate rs.30,000/- (rupees thirty thousand only) more within 45 days from today. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 2015 (HC)

Rajesh Kumar and Others Vs. Jayasree S and Another

Court : Kerala

..... was filed under sec.12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act claiming maintenance at the rate of `5,000/- per mensem and also for a residential order to direct the 1st petitioner to provide an alternative accommodation to the 1st respondent as enjoyed by her in the shared house and to pay rent ..... he was also directed to provide alternative accommodation as prayed for and also prohibited him from causing any obstruction to the peaceful residence of the 1st respondent wherever she resides. ..... i am of the opinion that merely on the reason that the 1st respondent has 50 sovereigns of gold ornaments, the husband cannot be exempted from the liability to pay maintenance allowance under sec.125 of the cr.p.c. ..... a protection order was also crl.r.p. ..... as rightly held by the court below, that does not exempt the 1st petitioner from providing residence to the 1st crl.r.p. ..... the 1st respondent was subjected to physical torture and she was pushed away from the matrimonial home. ..... according to the averments in the petition, the 1st respondent is the legally wedded wife of the 1st petitioner, who is entitled to get maintenance allowance from the 1st petitioner. ..... , the reasons for which the wife is not entitled to get maintenance from the husband. ..... the 1st petitioner admitted the marital status of the 1st respondent; but denied the allegation that he refused to pay maintenance allowance and treated her cruelly and pushed out the 1st respondent from the house.3. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2012 (HC)

Anoopkumar, Karimpurath House, Erumpayam (Po) Vs. the State of Kerala, ...

Court : Kerala

..... the application was one under section 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 for maintenance at the rate of rs.10,000/- per month. 3. ..... the further contention was that the petitioner also earns rs.3,000/- per month from the landed property. ..... petitioner complains of cruelty at the hands of the inmates of the house of the first respondent and also alleged that she was being harassed asking her to get money from her house. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //