Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of plant varieties and farmers rights act 2001 section 6 officers and other employees of authority Sorted by: old Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 12 results (0.209 seconds)

Feb 05 1981 (HC)

B. Satyanarayana and ors., Etc., Etc. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1982)ILLJ224AP

..... that in addition to the audit to be carried out in accordance with the act, the comptroller and auditor general of india shall have the right to arrange for external audit by an authority appointed by him, and the authority so appointed by the comptroller and auditor-general of india and all the members of the staff working under that authority shall, at all reasonable times, have access to all accounts, account books, ..... any financial assistance given by the state, and if so, what is the magnitude of such assistance whether there is any other form of assistance, given by the state and if so whether it is of the usual kind or it is extraordinary, whether there is any control of the management and policies of the corporation by the state and what is the nature and extent of such control, whether the corporation enjoys state conferred or state protected monopoly status and whether the functions carried out by corporation are ..... ; to manufacture, buy, import, export, sell and generally dail in all kinds of leather good; (3) to manufacture, buy, import, export, sell and generally deal in all varieties of vegetable tan-stuffs, tanning chemicals, acids, solutions and compounds, utilised for tanning and all types of grindaries, eye-lets, toeplates, horse-shoes, and nails, panel pins, shoe polishes, wax balls, ..... article 70 lays down that total number of directors both ex officio directors and director other then ex office director of the company, shall neither be less than two nor more than .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2002 (HC)

D. Srinivasa Raju Vs. District Forest Officer and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD252

..... respondent in these writ petitions directed all the field officers like assistant directors to destroy the catfish as and when they come across in the water bodies and to take all steps to ensure that the culture of catfish is not taken up by the fish farmers and the rearing type of culture systems. ..... government or the state government in exercise of their powers either under section 3 or in relation to section 4 of the act is also law which can impose restrictions on the exercise of right to carry on trade or business.22. ..... destroyed and banned for its specific qualities of being predatory in nature and to avoid cross breeding with indian species and to protect the fish fauna in kolleru lake and other areas. ..... variety of indian species of fish are also carnivorous or omnivorous, that there is no definite scientific evidence that african catfish is predatory in nature and cannibalistic and hence, the decision to ban and destroy clarias gariepinus from india is arbitrary and ..... the farmers are having their fish ponds of african catfish culture far away from kolleru lake and therefore, the conclusion arrived at by the authorities that there is likelihood of escape of african catfish into kolleru lake resulting in cross-breeding with indian species is unscientific and not supported by any evidence and therefore ..... 2001(2)ald260 (db), balco employees ..... the exotic animals and the exotic plants fascinated the human beings since the beginning of civilization for various reasons like satiation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2012 (HC)

Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd.,rep. by Its Dy Vs. Protection of Plant Varie ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... these cases arise against the backdrop of the protection of plant varieties and farmers' rights act, 2001 (for brevity, 'the act'). ..... , the protection of plant varieties and farmers' rights authority (hereinafter, 'the competent authority') to entertain and process applications from plant breeders, farmers or persons claiming through them for registration of the plant varieties over which rights are sought to be asserted. ..... this legislation was promulgated by the parliament for protecting the intellectual property rights of plant breeders and farmers over plant varieties developed by them. ..... the respondent company has its registered office at mumbai and its applications for registration of its plant varieties were filed in new delhi where the competent authority has its head office. ..... house of lords explained the ambit of the principle 'forum non conveniens' for issuing an order of stay: "(1) the fundamental principle applicable to both the stay of english proceedings on the ground that some other forum was the appropriate forum and also the grant of leave to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction was that the court would choose that forum in which the case could be tried more suitably for the interests of all ..... it may be noted that under section 10 of the companies act, 1956, the registered office of a company incorporated under the said act would determine the high court which would have jurisdiction for the purposes of that act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2012 (HC)

Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd.,Rep. by Its Dy Vs. Protection of Plant Varie ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... these cases arise against the backdrop of the protection of plant varieties and farmers' rights act, 2001 (for brevity, 'the act'). ..... , the protection of plant varieties and farmers' rights authority (hereinafter, 'the competent authority') to entertain and process applications from plant breeders, farmers or persons claiming through them for registration of the plant varieties over which rights are sought to be asserted. ..... protection of plant variety & farmers'rights authority, the registrar, national academy of agricultural sciences,(n.a.s.c.complex), opp. ..... the respondent company has its registered office at mumbai and its applications for registration of its plant varieties were filed in new delhi where the competent authority has its head office. ..... house of lords explained the ambit of the principle 'forum non conveniens' for issuing an order of stay: "(1) the fundamental principle applicable to both the stay of english proceedings on the ground that some other forum was the appropriate forum and also the grant of leave to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction was that the court would choose that forum in which the case could be tried more suitably for the interests of all ..... it may be noted that under section 10 of the companies act, 1956, the registered office of a company incorporated under the said act would determine the high court which would have jurisdiction for the purposes of that act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2012 (HC)

Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd Hyderabad Vs. the Protection of Plant Variety ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... a writ of mandamus is solicited for declaring the advertisement of the 2nd respondent's applications in respect of mrc-7918, mrc-7041 bgii and mrc- 7160 varieties in the "plant variety journal of india" without following the due procedure specified under the provisions contained in sections 19, 20, 21 read with rule 29 and 30 of protection of plant varieties and farmers' rights act, 2001 as illegal and unconstitutional and for other allied reliefs. 2. ..... in accordance with the provisions of protection of plant varieties and farmers rights act, 2001, the 1st respondent authority came to be constituted for enabling registration of plant varieties and essentially derived varieties. ..... the division bench clearly held that a farmer or a breeder, therefore, need not wait till the competent authority completes the registration of a plant variety in violation of his rights before approaching the competent court. ..... (2) if a part of cause of action arises within the territory of the state, the jurisdiction of this court can be invoked though the authority who took the decision may have been stationed beyond the territorial limits of the state. ..... although the origin of this doctrine in anglo-american law is somewhat obscure, however, most authorities are in agreement that this doctrine found its earliest expression in scottish estate cases. ..... 8031 of 2010 that a writ of certiorari cannot be issued to the competent authority as the same is not situated within the territorial limits of the state. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2013 (TRI)

Mangali Shankaraiah Vs. Pragathi Seeds Centre, Dealers in Quality Seed ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... can be filed only under seeds act and not under consumer protection act, the honble supreme court of india held that seeds act is totally silent on the issue of payment of compensation for the loss of crop on account of use of defective seeds and that any attempt to exclude farmers from the ambit of consumer protection act by implication will make that act vulnerable to an attack of unconstitutionality on the ground of discrimination and that it is not possible ..... by seeing the photographs filed by the complainant it is not possible to assess the plant crop position, variety and age of the crop, so also the crop management of the entire field because a selective parts of ..... and that the complainant did not establish with any convincing material that showed the seeds within the specified time and that he purchased and used fertilizers or pesticides and followed better crop management and that getting of good yield of crop depends not only on good seeds but also on other agricultural operations and management such as nature of land, proper preparation of land, fertilization, pests and ..... officer concerned he did not take any care and action and that on account of deficient service rendered by ops 1 and 2 he sustained loss of rs.80,000/- and ..... )of c p act and ought to have invoke section 13(iv ) (iii) of c p act to consider the complainants case and thus prayed to allow the appeal, set aside the impugned order and consequently to allow ..... correct perspection and arrived at right conclusion in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2000 (HC)

D. Sesharani and Ors. Vs. Managing Director, A.P. Women's Co-op. Finan ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(2)ALT607

..... note the ambit and scope of the applicability of the provisions of act.section 2 (vi) 'public service' means, services in any office or establishment of,--(a) the government;(b) a local authority;(c) a corporation or undertaking wholly owned or controlled by the state government;(d) a body established under any law made by the legislature of the state whether incorporated or not, including a university; and(e) any other body established by ..... suitable provision therefore; and(d) to protect the interests of candidates registered with employment exchange, the reservation rights of scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and backward classes, the rights of the existing employees who are recruited through proper channel and the functions of andhra pradesh public service commission, district selection committees and other selection committees constituted ..... 'personal liberty' is of the widest amplitude and it covers a variety of rights which go to constitute the personal liberty of man and some of them have been raised to the status of distinct fundamental rights and given additional protection under art. 19. ..... and personal property and any rights or privileges which the corporation may think necessary, any or convenient for the purpose of its business and in particular and land buildings easements machinery plant and ..... farmers' society limited and ..... 2001 if they are not already drawing the time scale of pay either under the interim orders of this court or under the orders of the appointing authority .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2000 (HC)

Virginia Tobacco Growers Association and Others Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD427; 2001(1)ALT406

..... other varieties of tobacco than virginia, but the tobacco board act, 1975, which is a central enactment (central act no.4 of 1975), (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') deals with all kinds and varieties of tobacco and that is so clear from the provision contained in sub-section (3) of section 8 of the act ..... farmers who have grown the crops in the fond expectation of permission to continue the same, as also the farm-labour and above all, national economy, which is one of the prime factors in enacting the tobacco board act, 1975, as the piquant situation is that the growers now cannot raise other crops, as the season had already passed the standing tobacco crop would wither away, if the protective ..... virginia tobacco for the year 2000-2001 as a reasonable restriction and laid stress on the glut of virginia tobacco crop of yester years and that having regard to the said factor, the growers may not fetch competitive price and as such, the board had acted reasonably in imposing a crop holiday ..... and in that process, it may some times happen that the crop size is reduced and even may lead to a condition where the growing of virginia tobacco may have to be stopped for some period, say, period of one year, as in the instant case, and if the fact situation so warrants resulting in a crop holiday for a year, it cannot be called as an unreasonable restriction violating the fundamental right ..... which is the final authority in this matter, as is evident from section 20a of the act, which reads:'20-a. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2001 (HC)

Madireddy Padma Rambabu and ors. Vs. District Forest Officer, Kakinada ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD728; 2002(3)ALT57

..... officer and the tribunal on appeal, if any, to it as to whether he is actually entitled to such patta; (e) the principal or any other landholder and any other person whose rights stand transferred under clause (b) or cease and determine under clause (c), shall be entitled only to compensation from the government as provided in this act; (f) the relationship of landholder and ryot shall as between them, be extinguished; (g) ryots in the estate and ..... one or more of the guidelines have not been adhered to even where there are substantial deviations, unless such deviations are, by nature and extent such as to prejudice the interests of the public which it is their avowed object to protect, per contra, the court would be inclined to perhaps overlook or ignore such deviations, if the object of the statute or public ..... farmers who are already operating other than traditional and improved traditional systems of shrimp culture or proposed to be set up/ constructed outside crz are required to obtain authorization but also those farmers who are already operating traditional and improved traditional systems of shrimp aquaculture and who intend to apply for adoption of improved technology for increased production and ..... section 2(a) of the 1986 act defines 'environment' to mean :'environment' includes water, air and land and the inter-relationship, which exists among and between water, air and land, and humanbeings, other living creatures, plants, microorganism and ..... and mro, muthukur, : 2001 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2001 (HC)

Dr. T. Patanjali Sastry, President, Environment Centre Vs. Chairman, A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALT315

..... u/s 18 of wild life (protection) act, 1972 without permitting new roads and culverts;(7) right to maintain existing water courses and drains necessary to avert submersion of agricultural lands surrounding kolleru lake;(8) other rights and conditions as specified under sections 27 - 34 and other provisions of the wild life (protection) act, 1972;(9) electricity connection shall be given for domestic use only and not for aquaculture or any ..... officer authorized in that behalf and the decision so arrived at by the government or officer authorized ..... committed by digging fish tanks and cultivating foreign varieties of fish using dob, oil cake, poultry manure, farm yard manure, chemical fertilizers by reason whereof inferior, quality of fish are being produced which are not disease resistant and to prevent those diseases systematic and contact poisons are being used ..... fishing is not prohibited by the operation of the impugned notification and in view of the fact that bunding of fish tanks is hampering the delta system resulting in heavy floods and losses to farmers therein, we do not find any merit in the contention that ..... in this act, unless the context otherwise requires,-(a) 'environment' includes water, air and land and the inter-relationship which exists among and between water, air and land, and human beings, other living creatures, plants, micro-organism and property;(b) ' ..... and 2001 and batch cases held that the above directions of the apex court are mandatory in nature and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //