Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: protection of plant varieties and farmers rights act 2001 chapter i preliminary Page 1 of about 303 results (0.136 seconds)

A.Kamarunnisa Ghori. Vs. the Chairperson Prevention of Money Launderin ...

Court : Chennai

..... -19offences under the information technology act, 2000paragraph-20offences under the biological diversity act, 2002paragraph-21offences under the protection of plant varieties and farmers' rights act, 2001paragraph-22offences under the environment protection act, 1986paragraph-23offences under the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974paragraph-24offences under the air ..... follows:-paragraphoffencesparagraph-1certain offences under the indian penal code.paragraph-2offences under the arms act, 1959.paragraph-3offences under the wild life (protection) act, 1972paragraph-4offences under the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956paragraph-5offences under the prevention of corruption act, 1988paragraph-6offences under ..... the rights of children and women, who form part of the household of even those charged under the act, may have protection in terms of the constitutional provisions and international conventions relating to women and children. the validity of section 8(4) has .....

Cattle Remedies and anr. Vs. Licensing Authority/Director of Ayurvedic ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1093

..... 2002.(ii) the copyright act, 1957. (iii) the design act. 2000.(iv) the geographical indications of goods (registration and protection) act, 1999.(v) the patents act, 1970.(vi) the protection of plant varieties and farmers rights act, 2001.(vii) the semiconductor integrated circuits layout design act, 2000.(viii) the trade marks act, 1999.i ..... .p.rs. are also dealt under two more areas namely, the trade secret and the indian contract act. we have yet to enact any statutory law governing the trade secret. however, we are protecting ..... manufacturers that certain exclusive privileges in their inventions should be granted to them in india, and that exclusive privileges obtained under the said act should be protected : it is enacted as follows):appendix-isections 3(a), 3(h) and 33eea of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940, are as follows:3 .....

Monsanto Technology Llc and Ors. Vs.nuziveedu Seeds Limited & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... , its preamble emphasizing its objectives as to encourage the development of new varieties of plants and to protect the rights of the breeders. any new variety created is registrable under section 15 of the plant varieties act. section 2(za) of plant varieties act defines variety to include a non-transgenic variety or a transgenic variety, that includes a plant variety containing the nucleic acid sequence developed by the defendants.89. in the ..... 3(f), 3(h) and (j), section 8, section 10 (4) and section 59 (1), submitting that impugned acts on the part of defendants are protected by the provisions of the protection of plant varieties and farmers rights act, 2001 ( plant varieties act , for short), the said law by virtue of section 92, overriding the patents act, 1970, it affording a right , under section 30, to .....

Mylan Laboratories Limited vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... the bench shall comprise of a judicial member and a technical member (copyright) and for cases relating to the plant varieties protection, the bench shall comprise of a judicial member and a technical member (plant varieties protection). as per the status report, no technical member (copyright) has been appointed till date. with respect to ..... dr. onkar nath singh, previously holding post of head, crop improvement division, icar-national rice research institute, cuttack, was appointed as technical member (plant varieties protection appellate tribunal) on deputation basis w.e.f. 04/07/2018 by invoking the transitional provision under section 59 of ppv&fr act, 2001 which ..... 2016 whereas the post of technical member (trade marks) is lying vacant since 05th december, 2018. ipab has only one technical member relating to plant varieties protection.33. about 3935 cases are pending adjudication before ipab across all its benches. however, cases relating to trademarks, copyrights and patents are not .....

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... india. paragraph23offences under the biological diversity act, 2002 (18 of 2003) section description of offence 55 read with penalties for contravention of section 6, etc. section 6. paragraph24offences under the protection of plant varieties and farmers rights act, 2001 (53 of 2001) section description of offence 70 read with penalty for applying false denomination, etc. section 68 71 read with penalty for selling ..... varieties to which false section 68 denomination is applied. 72 read with penalty for falsely representing a variety as section 68 registered. 73 read with penalty for subsequent offence. section 68 paragraph25offences under the environment protection act, 1986 (29 of 1986) section description of offence 514 15 read with .....

State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Devans Modern Brewaries Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2003(10)SC485; 2003(10)SCALE202; (2004)11SCC26

..... old, the court did not make a similar attempt in case of indian made foreign liquor or imported liquor nor considered that sacramental wine has received statutory protection under the laws validly enacted. [as for example see bombay sacramental wine manufacturing rules, 1950 framed under the bombay prohibition act, 1949. sacramental wine refers ..... impose regulations if the congress is deemed to have occupied the field. the states may not tax interstate and foreign commerce (see powell, thomas reed, 'vagaries and varieties in constitutional interpretation', p. 180). there is no cooley law governing state taxation. marshall, j. in brown v. maryland, a case involving state tax on ..... distillery brewery or warehouse;provided that duty may be levied:- (a) on intoxicating drugs by an acreage rated levied on the cultivation of the hemp plant or by a rate charged on the quantity collected.(b) on spirit or beer manufactured in any distillery established or any distillery or brewery licensed, under .....

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

..... trade marks including service marks geographical indications industrial designs lay-out designs of integrated circuits trade secrets patents patenting of micro-organisms and new plant varieties (seeds and other propagating material) 5.1.7 all forms of intellectual property have the potential to raise competition policy/law problems. ..... . more importantly, the committee has fully restructured the existing provisions relating to public interest, compulsory licensing, government use, national security, protection of traditional knowledge and protection of public health and nutrition as contained in chapter xvi (working of patents, compulsory licences and revocation) of the patents act. ..... after reviewing the existing provisions and ensuring clear demarcation between the jurisdiction of the mrtp commission and the consumer courts under the consumer protection act, 1986 so as to avoid any overlapping of jurisdiction; and (c) suitable administrative measures required in order to implement the .....

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

..... and viable ecosystem existed in the shoolpaneshwar sanctuary. moreover, with the construction of dam, water availability and soil moisture will increase and support varieties of plants and animals.113. it was also contended on behalf of petitioners that the whole project will have serious impacts on health, both around ..... pattern, use of improved seeds, insecticides and latest equipments.afforestation was carried out in 33 r&r; sites during 1999-2000 by planting 3500 saplings which are protected by bamboo tree-guards. plantation is done along the roadside, common plots, school premises etc. in the remaining sites plantation work is ..... mineral resources, including injurious minerals, in the impoundment; living conditions of affected tribal/aboriginals etc.the cost of proposed remedial and imitative measures to protect the environment had to be included in the project cost. imitative measures included, among other things, compensatory afforestation. only when the incorporation of environmental .....

Kommisetty Nammalwar and Co. Rep. by Its Proprietor Kommisetty Nammalw ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(4)ALT431:AIR2009NOC2482(A.P)(F.B).

..... receipt of our order. the interim order passed in the matter shall continue till the disposal of the matters by the high court afresh. by granting this protection, it shall not be construed as if we have expressed any order on the merits of the case. the appeals are disposed of accordingly.77. when the ..... 'butter', 'butter milk' and 'ghee' are traditional milk products in india. in modern times, other products like icecream, kulfi, kalakand, kova, srikand, gulab jamoon and a large varieties of sweets, chhana products (used for preparation of rasgulla) became popular as modern products of milk. india is the largest producer of milk. as much as 46% of milk produced ..... udyog : air 1985 sc 679 (supra) was held to be agricultural produce in some decisions. no distinction was made on method of production, namely, by modern plant and machinery. to say, therefore, that sugar being produced in mill or factories could not be deemed to be agricultural produce is both against the statutory language and .....

State (N.C.T. of Delhi) Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC3820; 2005CriLJ3950; 122(2005)DLT194(SC); (2005)11SCC600

..... and to remain silent. in miranda case (decided in 1966), it was held that the right to have counsel present at the interrogation was indispensable to the protection of the v amendment privilege against self- incrimination and to ensure that the right to choose between silence and speech remains unfettered throughout the interrogation process. however ..... v. arizona [1966 384 us 436] did extend the embargo to police investigation also, the court observed that there was no warrant to truncate the constitutional protection underlying article 20(3). it was held that even the investigation at the police level is embraced by article 20(3) and this is what precisely section ..... weeks would have prevailed. such offensive acts of unimaginable description and devastation would have posed a challenge to the government and the democratic institutions for the protection of which the government of the day stands. to underestimate it as a mere desperate act of a small group of persons who were sure to meet .....