Court : Delhi
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :27. h July, 2018 Date of decision :4. h August , 2018 CRL.REF.No.2/2016 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishanan, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Trideep Pais, Adv. (Amici Curiae) with Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri and Mr. Pranav Jain, Ms. Manvi Priya and Ms. Vrinda Bhandari, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for STATE the State. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The following reference dated 6th October, 2016 has been received from Shri Vishal Singh, Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board-I, Sewa Kutir Complex, Kingsway Camp, Delhi. Criminal Reference No.2 of 2016 Page 1 of 40 Inasmuch as the issues which require to be considered are succinctly set out therein, we extract the reference made by the ld. Judge under Section 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in extenso whic...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1].14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.CRIMINAL MISC.2nd BAIL APPLICATION NO.10115/2013 (Saint Shri Asharam Bapu versus State of Rajasthan) Date of order :: 10th February, 2014 HONBLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Mr.Ram Jethmalani, Mr.C.V.Nagesh, Mr.J.S.Choudhary, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.Anjani Kumar Singh, Saurabh Ajay Gupta, and Mr.Pradeep Choduhary, counsel for the petitioner. Dr.Pushpendra Singh Bhati & Mr.Rajesh Panwar, Additional Advocates General along with Mr.Pradhuman Singh, Mr.Chandra Sen Rathore and Mr.Mahipal Bishnoi, counsel for the State. Mr.P.C.Solanki & Mr.P.K.Verma, counsel for the complainant. Ms.Mukta Pareek & Mr.Ramdev, I.O.present in person. Reportable This is second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.The petitioner is seeking bail in Session Case No.152/2013 arising out of FIR No.122/2013, P.S.Mahila Thana (West) Jodhpur and 0/2013, P.S.Kamla Market Delhi, pending trial in the Court of Sessions Judge, Jodhpur for offence und...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1].21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.CRIMINAL MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.7115/2013 (Saint Shri Asharam Bapu versus State of Rajasthan) Date of order : : 01.10.2013 HONBLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Mr.Ram Jethmalani, Sr.Counsel assisted by Mr.Anjani Kumar Singh and Mr.Pradeep Choduhary, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Anand Purohit, AAG & Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Pradhuman Singh and Mr.Mahipal Bishnoi, counsel for the State. Mr.Manish Vyas and Mr.Kapil Purohit, counsel for the complainant. Ms.Chanchal Mishra, Investigating Officer. Reportable The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.122/2013, P.S.Mahila Thana (West) Jodhpur for the offence under Sections 342, 376, 354-A, 506, 509/34 of the IPC, Sections 23 & 26 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 and under Section 8 of the Protection of Children from sexual offences Act, 2012. The matt...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.26229 o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.26229 of 2012 DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 2 2013 Court on its own motion .......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present: Mr.B.S.Sewak, Advocate for the petitioner in Civil Writ Petition No.19484 of 2012. Ms.Promila Nain, Advocate for the petitioner in Civil Writ Petition No.20014 of 2012. Mr.H.C.Arora, Advocate for the petitioner in Civil Writ Petition No.3342 of 2013. Ms.Rita Kohli, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr.B.S.Rana, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr.Amar Vivek, Advocate for the intervenor. Mr.R.S.Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr.J.Toor, Advocate for Union Territory, Chandigarh. Ms.Punita Sethi, Advocate for Union of India. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.This order shall dispose of Civil Writ Petitions No.26229 of 2012 Court on its own motion ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : November 01, 2019 Decided on : December 03, 2019 Crl. Appeal No.187/2018 RAJ KUMAR STATE .... Appellant Through: Mr. Sharad Malhotra, Adv. for DHCLSC. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with ASI Ram Vilas, PS Pahar Ganj. Mr. Sarfraz Khan, Adv. for DSLSA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER1 This criminal appeal assailing conviction on charge of rape, notwithstanding the testimony of the prosecutrix conceding the relationship to be consensual, has led to revelation of a pattern of irresponsible exercise of jurisdiction vis--vis victim compensation scheme necessitating measures to be taken so as to curb misuse of public money.2. The appellant was brought to trial in the court of Sessions (case no.28940/2016) in the wake of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) dated 23.08.2016 submitted by the Station House Officer (SHO) of police stat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.03.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM H.C.P.No.2034 of 2013 C.Nagaraj .Petitioner versus 1.State of Tamil Nadu rep. By its Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 9. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate of Vellore District, Vellore - 9.Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of habeas corpus, to call for the entire records relating to petitioner's son detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order, dated 28.08.2013 on the file of the second respondent herein made in proceedings C3. D.O.No.79/2013 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the said petitioner's son namely Saranraj, son of C.Nagaraj, aged 22 years before this Court and set the petitioner's son at liberty from detention, now petitioner'...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 595/2018 and CRL.M.B. 887/2018 GOPI NISHA MALLAH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate THE STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER0409.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24th April, 2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-05 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in SC No.28195/2016 arising out of FIR No.15/2014 registered at PS Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi, convicting the Appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2) (i) and (m), 363, and 325 IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act).2. This appeal is also directed against the order on sentence of the same date whereby the Appellant was sentenced as under: (a) For the offence punishable under Section 325 IPC, to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) for a period of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ 35 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h July, 2019 + CRL.A. 887/2002 and Crl. M.A. 12247/2019 and 31654/2019 ABDUL JABBAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.A. Khan, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI Sumit Kumar, Spl. Cell Janakpuri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant Abdul Jabbar was brought to trial in the court of Sessions (in Sessions no.64/2001) with two others (Mohd. Asgar Konshi and Gurinderjeet Singh) on the basis of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) submitted upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (no.168/2001) of police station Parliament Street involving offences punishable under Sections 121, 121A, 122, 123 of the Indian Penal code, 1860 and Sections 3,4 & 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908. At the conclusion of the said trial, he (the appellant) and the other said two were found...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (1) D.B. Criminal Murder Reference No.3/2013 The State of Raj. vs. Manoj Pratap Singh (2) D.B. Criminal Jail Appeal No.854/2013 Manoj Pratap Singh vs. The State of Raj. Against the order dated 28.9.2013 passed by the Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Cases, Rajsamand in Sessions Case No.12/2013. Date of Judgment :29. 5.2015. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR. Mr. J.P. Bhardwaj, Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati, Counsel for the accused-appellant Manoj Pratap Singh. BY THE COURT:(Per Hon'ble Miss Jaishree Thakur,J.) 1. The learned Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Cases, Rajsamand vide order dated 28.9.2013 has convicted accused-appellant Manoj Pratap Singh under Sections 363, 365, 376(2)(f) and Section 302, Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (1) D.B. Criminal Murder Reference No.3/2013 The State of Raj. vs. Manoj Pratap Singh (2) D.B. Criminal Jail Appeal No.854/2013 Manoj Pratap Singh vs. The State of Raj. Against the order dated 28.9.2013 passed by the Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Cases, Rajsamand in Sessions Case No.12/2013. Date of Judgment :29. 5.2015. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR. Mr. J.P. Bhardwaj, Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati, Counsel for the accused-appellant Manoj Pratap Singh. BY THE COURT:(Per Hon'ble Miss Jaishree Thakur,J.) 1. The learned Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Cases, Rajsamand vide order dated 28.9.2013 has convicted accused-appellant Manoj Pratap Singh under Sections 363, 365, 376(2)(f) and Section 302, Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, ...
Tag this Judgment!