Proportionately - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: proportionately Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 161 results (0.051 seconds)Khoday Industries P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-06-1986
Reported in: (1987)60CTR(Kar)62; [1987]163ITR646(KAR); [1987]163ITR646(Karn)
..... disputes act 1947 c a no 14 1947 section 11 a subhas b adi j proportionality of punishment bank clerk dismissed from services for abusing customer and trying to assault him .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMary Roy and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-24-1986
Reported in: AIR1986SC1011; 1986(0)KLT508(SC); 1986(1)SCALE250; (1986)2SCC209; [1986]1SCR371; 1986(1)LC515(SC)
..... respect of sites plots on the transferees occupiers thereof therefore it is doubtful whether any proportionate reduction in penal default interest could be made on the ground of non provision of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax, U.P. Vs. Laxmi Sugar and Oil Mills Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-16-1986
Reported in: AIR1986SC1746; (1986)58CTR(SC)105; [1986]161ITR168(SC); 1986(2)SCALE33; (1986)3SCC528; [1986]3SCR214; [1986]SuppSCR214; 1986(2)LC502(SC)
..... brought to tax as business income is only 40 of the composite income and consequently proportionate depreciation is required to be taken into account because that is the depreciation actually allowed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Haryana and ors. Vs. Rajinder Kumar and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-01-1986
Reported in: 1987Supp(1)SCC20
..... b c ray jj practice and procedure mdash costs mdash amount of costs should be proportionate to the amount of compensation involved in a particular case mdash cpc 1908 section 35 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTYellappa Vs. Yellavva Kom Subray Gowda
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-21-1986
Reported in: ILR1987KAR683
..... a no 14 1947 section 11 a s r bannurmath a n venugopal gowda jj proportionality of punishment workman committed theft of employers property and has also used abusive and filthy .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNaib Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-23-1986
Reported in: AIR1986SC2192; 1987(35)BLJR166; 1986CriLJ2061; JT1986(1)SC511; 1986(2)SCALE476; (1986)4SCC401; 1986(2)LC620(SC)
..... gujarat civil services discipline and appeal rules 1971 r 6 dismissal from service punishment of proportionality disciplinary proceeding against food inspector he had flouted order of transfer deliberately remained absent without .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.C. Mandanna and Etc. Vs. Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribuna ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-26-1986
Reported in: AIR1987Kant69; 1986(2)KarLJ273
..... disputes act 1947 c a no 14 1947 section 11 a subhas b adi j proportionality of punishment bank clerk dismissed from services for abusing customer and trying to assault him .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDavis Vs. Bandemer
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1986
..... purposely prevents proportional representation is unconstitutional democratic voters need only show that their proportionate voting influence has been adversely affected 603 f supp at 1492 our cases ..... and proportional representation for political parties if there is a constitutional preference for proportionality the legitimacy of districting itself is called into question the voting strength of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChicago Teachers Union Vs. Hudson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-04-1986
..... and their fourteenth amendment due process rights and also permitted the use of their proportionate shares for impermissible purposes the district court rejected the challenges and upheld the ..... predeprivation hearings finally the district court refused to reach the contention that the nonmembers proportionate shares were in fact being used for impermissible purposes footnote 4 the district court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCity of Riverside Vs. Rivera
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-27-1986
..... of civil rights violations with effective access to the judicial process a rule of proportionality would make it difficult if not impossible for individuals with meritorious civil rights claims ..... because of the financial imperatives surrounding the hiring of competent counsel a rule of proportionality would make it difficult if not impossible for individuals with meritorious civil rights claims .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial