Prophylaxis - Judgment Search Results

The Empress Vs. Allen and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1881)ILR6Cal83

mr piffard1 the provisions of section 72 point out clearly the officers who are to have jurisdiction over european british...

Secretary T.N.E.B. Accounts Subordinate Union Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1994)ILLJ1128Mad

nainar sundaram j 1 the appellant raised an industrial dispute over the withdrawal by the first respondent of the concession...

J.C. Mills Ltd. Vs. Deshraj Singh Bachchusingh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1959MP119

a h khan j 1 the short facts leading to this appeal are that deshraj singh was employed by the...

In Re: Soorendro Nath Roy Chowdhry

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1880)ILR5Cal106

justice wilson j 1 this case gives rise to several questions of fact and law mr allen is right in...

Maryland Vs. Shatzer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the edwards rule is not a constitutional mandate but judicially prescribed prophylaxis see e g montejo v louisiana 556 u s 2009 ..... that the concurrence accepts our principal points it agrees that edwards prophylaxis is not perpetual it agrees that a break in custody ..... n 6 stating that e ven without edwards second layer of prophylaxis a defendant is still free to claim the prophylactic protection .....

Mccutcheon Vs. Federal Election Comm’n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... limits as a coherent system rather than merely a collection of individual limits stacking prophylaxis upon prophylaxis ibid nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp mccutcheon and the rnc appealed directly to this ..... are then layered on top ostensibly to prevent circumvention of the base limits this prophylaxis upon prophylaxis approach requires that we be particularly diligent in scrutinizing the law s fit wisconsin .....

Montejo Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... until counsel is present id at 153 these three layers of prophylaxis are sufficient on the other side of the equation the principal ..... his attorney 498 u s at 153 these three layers of prophylaxis are sufficient under the miranda edwards minnick line of cases which ..... result we today remove michigan v jackson s fourth story of prophylaxis the judgment of the louisiana supreme court is vacated and the .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Wander India Limited

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1990)(25)ECC315

..... in the following terms ascorbic acid is used primarily for the prophylaxis and treatment of scurvy although this condition is now seldom seen ..... 24 it has been stated that vitamins are used in the prophylaxis and treatment of various diseases including infectious and neoplastic conditions at ..... and have a place of their own in the therapy and prophylaxy of humans as well as animals the tribunal has held .....

United Student Aid Funds, Inc. Vs. Espinosa

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 16 3 expanding the availability of rule 60 b 4 relief is not an appropriate prophylaxis for discouraging unscrupulous debtors from filing chapter 13 plans proposing to dispense with the undue ..... but expanding the availability of relief under rule 60 b 4 is not an appropriate prophylaxis as we stated in taylor v freeland kronz 503 u s 638 1992 d ebtors .....

Dickerson Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... thought it could go beyond what the first amendment demanded in order to provide some prophylaxis petitioner and the united states are right on target however in characterizing the court s ..... requested i think it less a separate instance of claimed judicial power to impose constitutional prophylaxis than a direct logic driven consequence of miranda itself 461 sisted that congressional action under .....