Propensity - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: propensity Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 39 results (0.006 seconds)Rameshkumar Bhaverlal JaIn Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-18-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ4069
r k abichandani j 1 these appeals arise out of the judgement andorder passed by the learned additional city sessionsjudge...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMani Kumar Thapa Vs. State of Sikkim
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Apr-10-2001
Reported in: 2002CriLJ876
anup deb j 1 this appeal filed by mani kumar thapa is directed against the judgment of the learned special...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India and ors. Vs. M. Aslam and ors. Etc
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-04-2001
Reported in: AIR2001SC526; [2001(88)FLR759]; JT2001(1)SC278; 2001(1)SCALE48; [2001]1SCR62; (2001)1UPLBEC620
..... a criminal from acting in a way which may be a repetition of his criminal propensities and the restrictions that it imposes on the individual s right to reside in and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThakor Girishji Alias Gidhaji Jenaji Vs. District Magistrate
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-07-2001
Reported in: 2002CriLJ1148
..... detaining authority to consider the general back ground character and antecedents criminal tendency or propensity of the detenu and reluctance of the witnesses who gave statement against the detenu ..... and materials but if after considering the general background character antecedent criminal tendency or propensity etc of the detenue and the reluctance of the witnesses who gave the statements .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Shyam Mangilal Jadhav Vs. M.N. Singh, Commissioner of Police, Gre ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-28-2001
Reported in: (2001)3BOMLR549; 2001(3)MhLj737
..... in the issuance of the impugned order and at any rate bearing in mind the propensity and potentiality of the detenu to indulge in similar prejudicial activities in future the live ..... judgment we do not deal with mrs tahilramani s submission that bearing in mind the propensity and potentiality of the detenu to commit similar prejudicial activities the live link between his .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVeronica Sharad Salvi Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-27-2001
Reported in: 2001ALLMR(Cri)2122; (2002)104BOMLR50
..... delay in the issuance of the detention order the said delay on account of the propensity and potentiality of the detenu would not snap the live link between the prejudicial activities ..... mentioned in the grounds of detention are non cognizable complaints 9 whether on account of propensity and potentiality of the detenu the live link between the prejudicial activities of the detenu .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmarnath Dwivedi and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-24-2001
Reported in: 2001(5)MPHT343; 2001(3)MPLJ53
..... the whim and fancy of the people who have no responsibility cannot be appreciated such propensities cannot be encouraged to make them propitious the petitioners can be put in that category .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the Matter Of: K, a Judicial Officer
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-08-2001
Reported in: AIR2001SC972; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)511; 2001CriLJ1157; JT2001(2)SC397; 2001(1)KLT707(SC); RLW2001(2)SC280; 2001(1)SCALE685; [2001]1SCR959; 2001(1)LC685(SC); (2001)1UPLBEC797
..... whip on errors mistakes or failures the power should be so wielded as to have propensity to prevent and to ensure exclusion of repetition if committed once innocently or unwittingly pardon .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.C. Tamrakar and anr. Vs. Nidi Lekha
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-16-2001
Reported in: 2001IXAD(SC)154; AIR2001SC3806; JT2001(8)SC612; 2001(7)SCALE265; (2001)8SCC431
..... whip on errors mistakes or failures the power should be so wielded as to have propensity to prevent and to ensure exclusion of repetition if committed once innocently or unwittingly the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxmikant V. Patel Vs. Chetanbhat Shah and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-04-2001
Reported in: AIR2002SC275; 2002(1)ALD45(SC); 2002(1)ALLMR(SC)673; [2002]110CompCas518(SC); (2002)2GLR69; [2002(1)JCR293(SC)]; JT2001(10)SC285; RLW2002(1)SC129; 2001(8)SCALE350; (2002)3S
..... business or services which already belongs to someone else it results in confusion and has propensity of diverting the customers and clients of someone else to himself and thereby resulting in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial