Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: prohibition of child marriage act 2006 section 5 custody and maintenance of children of child marriages Page 1 of about 966 results (0.184 seconds)

T.Sivakumar Vs. Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

..... law being brought into force to restrain the child marriages by enacting the "child marriage restraint act, 1929". a reference to the said act would go to show that the said act, was enacted to carry forward the reformists movement of prohibiting child marriages. while it made a marriage in contravention of the provisions of the act ..... punishable, simultaneously it did not render the marriage void. it needs to be emphasized that voidness of marriages is statutorily provided and the same is not to be readily ..... the parties never attain the status of the husband and wife. similarly, under section 12 of the prohibition of child marriage act, a child marriage in certain circumstances has been declared as void. therefore, a child marriage which falls within the ambit of section 12 of the act also shall not give the status of husband .....

Independent Thought Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... india and the state governments intensively study and analyze these and other reports and take an informed decision on the effective implementation of the pcma and actively prohibit child marriages which encourages sexual intercourse with a girl child. welfare schemes and catchy slogans are excellent for awareness campaigns but they must be backed up by focused implementation programmes, other positive and remedial action so ..... of giving consent to have sex and legally she cannot marry. parliament has also, in no uncertain terms, prohibited child marriage and come to the conclusion that child marriage is an activity which must come to an end. if that be so, can the practice of child marriage which is admittedly an evil , and is also a criminal offence be set up as an exception in a .....

Selvam @ Ramasamy Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Erode ...

Court : Chennai

..... simple imprisonment for two years for offence under section 366 i.p.c.; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years for offence under section 9 of the prohibition of child marriage act, 2006 and to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of rs.10,000/- in default to under simple imprisonment for two years for ..... the file of the learned sessions judge (fast track magalir court), erode. he stood charged for offence under section 366 i.p.c., section 9 of the prohibition of child marriage act, 2006 and section 6 of the protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as pocso act ). by judgment dated 07.09. ..... 1 and 2 and the medical evidence. in our considered view, the prosecution has clearly established that the accused kidnapped the child (p.w.3), confined her, performed a marriage in violation of the prohibition of child marriage act, 2006 and then had aggravated penetrated sexual assault on her. 7. the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that .....

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... declared unconstitutional insofar as it mandates a different minimum age requirement for men and women. this court ought to declare twenty- one years as the ideal age for all marriages. the prohibition of child marriage (amendment) bill 2021, which seeks to raise the legally permissible age of girls to marry from eighteen years to twenty-one years is currently pending in parliament.38. thulasi ..... book (known as kitabiyas), such as jews, sabians and christians. no marriage with polytheists is permitted. similarly, widow re-marriage amongst hindus was prohibited. likewise, injunctions against inter-caste marriages were widely prevalent. child marriages were widely prevalent too. inter-religious marriages were impossible. in the usa, various laws had, in the past, prohibited interracial marriages. arranged marriages were very common throughout the world until the 18th century.8. it .....

Jago Foundation Through Its Secretary Baidyanath Mahto Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... initially, the writ petition was filed for a direction upon the respondent-state of jharkhand to appoint a full-time child marriage prohibition officer under section 16(1) of the prohibition of child marriage act, 2006 and for a direction for framing rules under section 19 of the act. during the pendency of the ..... consulting the state governments and the union territories administrations, the central government repealed the 1929 act and enacted the prohibition of child marriage act, 2006.4. rule 4 of the jharkhand child marriage prohibition rules, 2015 provides that awareness through different media and incentive for active role played by the members of civil ..... , the state government issued notification dated 11.06.2007 designating the block development officer in each block as the child marriage prohibition officer and, vide notification dated 23.04.2015, the jharkhand child marriage prohibition rules, 2015 have also been notified.2. mr. a.k. agarwal, the learned counsel for the petitioner .....

N. Rasu @ Velayutham (A3) and Others Vs. State Rep by Inspector of Pol ...

Court : Chennai

..... ipc2a2 and a9332 of ipc3a1366 of ipc4a3 to a6366 r/w 34 of ipc5a1506(ii) of ipc6a1 to a9368 r/w 366 of ipc7a19 of prohibition of child marriage act, 20068a2 to a910 of prohibition of child marriage act, 20069a16 of pocso act10a2 to a96 r/w 17 of pocso actby judgment dated 10.05.2016, the trial court acquitted the 5th ..... w 366 of ipcrigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of rs.10,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two yearssection 10 of prohibition of child marriage act, 2006rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of rs.10,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six monthschallenging the said conviction ..... w 366 of ipcrigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of rs.10,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two yearssection 9 of prohibition of child marriage act, 2006rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of rs.10,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six monthssection 6 of pocso .....

Ms. Seema Begaum Vs. State of Karnataka by Its Secy., Women and Child ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... the said act. section 13(1) reads as follows: 13. power of court to issue injunction prohibiting child marriages.- (1) notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this act, if, on an application of the child marriage prohibition officer or on receipt of information through a complaint or otherwise from any person, a judicial magistrate of ..... of the evil a paramount requirement. 24. the prime reason for bringing in the p.c.m. act is the prohibition of the solemnization of the child marriage. when the prescribed marriageable age of the girl is 18 years, this court cannot be called upon to issue the sought declaration that the provisions ..... injunction against any person including a member of an organization or an association of persons prohibiting such marriage. 26. when there is legislative ban on the child marriages, the courts cannot go out of their way to help the promoters of child marriages. 27. the courts will prefer the construction, which advances the object rather than .....

M. Janaki Vs. K. Vairamuthu

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... attains the age of majority on completing eighteen years of age. keeping in mind the same, if we again look into subsection (3) of section 3 of the prohibition of child marriage act, the anomaly in the act will emerge to light. in the case of a female, as per sub-section (3) since she attains the age of ..... the petitioner is a minor, the petition may be filed through his or her guardian or next friend along with the child marriage prohibition officer. (3) the petition under this section may be filed at any time but before the child filing the petition completes two years of attaining majority. (4) while granting a decree of nullity under this section, ..... or not) was solemnized before she attained the age of fifteen years and she has repudiated the marriage after attaining the age but before attaining the age of eighteen years. 7. section 2 (a) of prohibition of child marriage act, 2006 defines a child thus: child means a person who, if a male, has not completed twenty-one years of age, and .....

Anurag Kumar Gangwar @ Deepu Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... ad delhi 256. though another division bench of this court has referred the matter to a larger bench on the ground that the provisions of the prohibition of child marriage act, 2006 which makes contracting of marriage by a boy above the age of 15 years with a girl who is less than 18 years of age a cognizable offence, the decision ..... of petitioner. respondent no. 3 abandoned the guardianship of her parents of her own went up to muradabad. she then married him of her own and also got the marriage registered and persuaded the petitioner to come to the bus stand and take her with him. she was capable of understanding the implications of the step taken by her. ..... bus stand. she further states that she married the petitioner of her own on 12th june, 2009 in shiv mandir, maula garh, muradabad and also got the marriage registered with registrar of hindu marriages, chandosi, muradabad on 26th june, 2009. she states that she does not want to go with her parents and wants to go only with the petitioner, .....

Sri Poojari Peddanna Vs. the State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR1789; 2009(5)KarLJ556

..... the legal opinion is tendered without there being any basis for the same. similarly there is no legal impediment in compulsorily acquiring the land granted under the ptcl act but by following the procedural requirements. the respondents have also shown that the notification under section 1(3) of kiad act is indeed issued. i do ..... orders. sitting in judgment over the alienation and the restoration orders in these writ petitions is not warranted.. the validity or otherwise of the proceedings under the ptcl act cannot be decided in these petitions, where the challenge raised is only to the acquisition proceedings. suffice it to hold that the petitioners have the locus-standi ..... the agenda note for the additional subject no. 10 clearly mentions that the land in question is the granted land and that the proceedings are pending under ptcl act. when the ptcl proceedings were within the knowledge of the respondent no. 1 and 2, the non-issuance of notice to the original grantees/their legal .....