Profitable - Judgment Search Results
V. Jaganmohan Rao and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and Excess P ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-31-1969
Reported in: [1970]75ITR373(SC)
1945-46, 1946-47 not only to income-tax but also to excess profits tax. On February 1, 1941, he purchased from Randhi Appalaswamy
War Profits Tax Commissioner, Madhya Pradesh, Indore Vs. Binodram Balc ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-20-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC246; [1966]62ITR740(SC); [1966]SuppSCR224
made to it under s. 46 of the Gwalior War Profits Tax Ordinance, Samvat 2001 - hereinafter called the Ordinance. Three
The War Profits Tax Commissioner Vs. Binodiram Balchand
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-20-1961
Reported in: AIR1966SC1768; [1962]44ITR556(SC); [1962]Supp2SCR243
of Madhya Pradesh under s. 47(2) of the Gwalior War Profits Ordinance, Samvat 2001 (hereafter called the Ordinance) on the ground
G. Ekambarappa and ors. Vs. Excess Profits Tax Officer, Bellary
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-02-1967
Reported in: AIR1967SC1541; [1967]65ITR656(SC); [1967]3SCR864
issued by the respondent under s. 15 of the Excess Profit Tax Act 1940 (Act XV of 1940), hereinafter called the
Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Excess Profits Tax Officer.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-19-1984
Reported in: [1984]8ITD788(Mum)
ORDERPer Dr. Balasubramanian, Vice President - The excess profits tax assessment of this assessee for the chargeable accounting period
G. Padmanabhappa Vs. Excess Profits Tax Officer, Bellary
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-13-1962
Reported in: [1963]49ITR763(KAR); [1963]49ITR763(Karn)
dissolved firm. The firm in question was assessed to excess profits tax in a sum of Rs. 74,612-11-0 and a compulsory
S. Chattanatha Karayalar Vs. Excess Profits Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-12-1972
Reported in: [1973]92ITR384(Mad)
same date, December 31, 1963, passed under the Travancore Excess Profits Tax Act, 1120 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Travancore Act
Ahmedbhai Umarbhai and Co. Vs. Excess Profits Tax Officer, Iii Circle
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-17-1948
Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR349
is whether the assessee is liable to payment of Excess Profit Tax in respect of sales of goods manufactured in Raichur
Commissioner of Excess Profit Tax, Kanpur Vs. Kalyan Mal Phool Chand
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-13-1987
Reported in: AIR1987SC2140; [1987]166ITR180(SC); 1987(1)SCALE563; (1987)2SCC458; [1987]2SCR601; 1987(1)LC721(SC)
February 1971. It relates to the assessment under the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940 (hereinafter called the 'Act'). The assessee was
Khaitan Apte and Co. and anr. Vs. D. Rama Rao, Income-tax Officer/Exce ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-24-1971
Reported in: [1973]92ITR569(SC)
Court.2. M/s. Khaitan Apte & Co. were assessed to excess profits tax by the Excess Profits Tax Officer, Rajahmundry in a
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »