Skip to content


Profiling - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: profiling Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 373 results (0.03 seconds)
Feb 26 2001 (TRI)

ispat Profiles India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-26-2001

Reported in: (2001)(132)ELT338Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the appellant is absent and unrepresented by a fax received today mr r s paranjape its chartered accountant requests...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 2001 (HC)

M/S. Continental Profiles Ltd. Vs. Mr. Gopal Bali

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2001

Reported in: 92(2001)DLT204; 2001(59)DRJ66

ordervikramajit sen j caveat no 32 2001 1 since the caveator is represented through counsel caveat stands disposed off sao...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Mahalakshmi Profiles Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jun-02-2001

1 all these three appeals arise from common order in appeal nos 186 to 188 2000 dt 8 9 2000...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2001 (TRI)

The Commissioner of Central Vs. M/S. Golden Profiles, Bangalore

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: May-29-2001

1 this is an appeal filed by the revenue the revenue has filed this appeal on the ground that the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 2001 (TRI)

Tata Infotech Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-11-2001

Reported in: (2002)(81)ECC86

..... no necessity to file contracts even then 118 contracts were submitted to the commissioner a profile was filed of 90 contracts showing co relation between services rendered and equipment installed in ..... assesses submitted a number of contracts where the contracts were not available they submitted project profiles 12 from the findings recorded by the commissioner it is obvious that he interpreted the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Himson Textiles Engineering Vs. Commissioner of Customs-i,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-03-2001

Reported in: (2001)(136)ELT222Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the importation of second hand multi spindle copying duplicating and profile milling machine the item in question was imported from ..... that the functions of the machine is copying duplicating and profile milling besides the job of universal milling machine this is ..... opinion that the machine is multi spindle copying duplicating or profile milling is without any support of evidence these two certificates .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 19 2001 (TRI)

M/S Pack Plast Industries, Kota Vs. Cce, New Delhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-19-2001

Reported in: (2001)LC32Tri(Delhi)

..... it cannot be classified under heading 39 16 of the tariff as profiles the ld counsel also emphasised that it is not the case of ..... ashok kumar ld dr submitted that mist eliminator is nothing but pvc profiles which are classifiable under heading 39 16 of the tariff he relied ..... is not applicable as it was found in that case that hollow profiles were not used in the manufacture of tubes and pipes of chimney .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2001 (HC)

Goel Associates Vs. Sail Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. and An ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-01-2001

Reported in: 60(2001)DLT338

..... vidyarthi who by letter dated august 28 1987 exh cw 1 r ii along with profile approached respondent as associate of m s goel associates for being engaged as architects in ..... vidyarthi iii by letter dated august 28 1987 exh cw 1 r ii along with profile he approached respondent as associate of m s goel associates for being engaged as architects .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 2001 (HC)

Lt. Col. Gurmit Singh Vs. Union of India and Another

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-30-2001

Reported in: 2002(61)DRJ84

..... paragraph 2 1 of the petition there was an averment that the petitioner s career profile has always been above average i e box gradings were 8 out of maximum 9 ..... an approach in paragraph 18 where it observed that selection is based on an overall profile of an officer with special stress on the performance in criteria command appointment learned counsel .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2001 (HC)

K.C. Prasad Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2001

Reported in: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)1029

..... belevelled by the petitioner as his acr for 1990 was notconfirming of his overall acr profile thereforee thesame was set aside the contention of the petitionerthat his complain regarding acr of ..... india reported as 1996 v ad delhi 199 observed selection is based on an overall profile ofan officer with special stress on theperformance in criteria command appointment the aim of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //