Process And Processing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: process and processing Sorted by: recent Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 5,029 results (0.383 seconds)Sri S. Sankara Reddy Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2003
Reported in: (2005)92ITD84(Hyd.)
1 these appeals in all 40 in number are filed by five different assessees who are assessed in the status...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.C. (import) Vs. Nav Maharashtra Chakkan Oil Mills
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-31-2003
Reported in: (2004)(92)ECC193
1 vitamin c when imported from chine japan russia and european union was brought under anti dumping duty vide notification...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGhodavat Pan Masala Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-31-2003
..... the raw material consumption given above is inclusive of following losses occurred during manufacturing process which is also subject to variations due to climatic conditions he also stated that ..... department who had opportunity to inspect the nature of raw materials and physical production process during their visit that the clandestine production and clearance are alleged without producing even .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Seshadri Vs. the Recovery Officer-i and ors.
Court: DRAT Madras
Decided on: Dec-31-2003
Reported in: II(2004)BC200
..... relevant material information to the intending purchaser in order to ensure fair and transparent sale process so that he can judge the exact and actual value of the property so that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoint Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Raj Kumar Aggarwala and Sons
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-31-2003
Reported in: (2005)95TTJ(Delhi)315
..... under the wt act the high court held that a house under construction or in the process of completion cannot be treated as a house for the purposes of section 5 1 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.S. Chahal Vs. Income Tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar
Decided on: Dec-31-2003
Reported in: (2004)82TTJ(Asr.)841
..... huf karta less income tax paid under s 140abased on returns processed as per assessment record it was found that for the shortfall ..... paid under section 140a and the returns so filed were duly processed as per assessment record these facts point out that the tax ..... duly deposited by him under section 140a and such returns were processed as per assessment record having recovered the tax on the contract .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPetroleum Workers Union Represented by Regional Secretary, Hindustan P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-31-2003
Reported in: (2004)IIILLJ100Mad
..... and plead contradictory facts the conduct of the individual workers is nothing but abuse of process of court individual workers have pleaded facts contrary to the contentions of the union only ..... or had pleaded wrongly entertaining contradictory pleadings would result in abuse of legal and judicial process 13 therefore the pleading of the union has to be accepted and hence the status .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kriplon Synthetics Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-31-2003
..... brief facts of the case are that the respondents are engaged in the manufacture of processed textile fabrics they were operating under the compounded levy scheme under hot air stenter independent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUma Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce and C
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-31-2003
Reported in: (2004)(114)LC472Tri(Mum.)bai
..... technical know how or technical staff to undertake any activity in the nature of any process of manufacture during the relevant period i e from april 1990 to february 1993 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKamdeep Marketing Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-31-2003
Reported in: (2004)(91)ECC673
1 all these appeals are against imposition of penalties by the adjudicating authority under rule 209 a of the erstwhile...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial