Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: prisons act 1894 section 9 officers not to have business dealings with prisoners Page 1 of about 1,402 results (4.792 seconds)

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... section 2(b)(ii), transgender persons act 236 section 3(a), transgender persons act 237 section 3(b), 3(c), transgender persons act 238 section 3(d), transgender persons act 239 section 3(f), transgender persons act 240 section 3(g), transgender persons act 241 section 3(h), transgender persons act 242 section 3(i), transgender persons act 243 section 3(e), transgender persons act ..... is founded. 129 part d168 depending on how relationships are organized and managed, they can be a beacon of freedom, or a prison. 161 while there are relationships which are characterized by love, mutual-respect, and devotion to one another, certain relationships are also ..... parties and caused disturbances.2316. often, instruments of the state which are tasked with protecting human rights, perpetuate violence. police and prison officials exhibit violence towards the queer community. research conducted by the national institute of epidemiology involving around 60,000 transgender participants revealed that .....

Ritesh SinhA. Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... relevant provisions of the code and other relevant statutes discloses a scheme which aims at strengthening the hands of the investigator. section 53, section 54a, section 311a of the code, section 73 of the evidence act and the prisoners act to which i shall soon refer reflect parliament's efforts in that behalf. i have already noted that in kathi kalu ..... prints are like finger prints, they would be covered by the term measurements'."she finally concludes:"i am, therefore, of the opinion that a magistrate acting under section 5 of the prisoners act can give a direction to any person to give his voice sample for the purposes of any investigation or proceeding under the code."20. i am ..... a legal provision to pass an order directing the accused to give voice sample during investigation. the legal provision, in my opinion, can be traced to the prisoners act and section 53 of the code.46. i am mindful of the fact that foreign decisions are not binding on our courts. but, i must refer to the .....

In Re: Sushanta Goswami and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1969)1SCC273; [1969]3SCR138

..... 27 (nagendra nath saha). - this petitioner was detained by an order, dated april 19, 1968, made by the district magistrate, 24 parganas, under section 3(2) of the act, the grounds of detention being the prevention of activities prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. on receiving the grounds he made a representation to the ..... 12 (ashoke kumar mukherjee). - this petitioner was detained by the order of the district magistrate 24 parganas, dated may 25, 1968, made under section 3(2) of the act, the reason for his detention being the prevention of activities prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. the grounds were supplies to him and he made ..... habibullah khan). this petitioner was detained by an order, dated february 17, 1968, made by the district magistrate 24 parganas, under section 3(2) of the act in order to prevent him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. on receiving the grounds he made a representation to the advisory board which .....

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Divisional Co ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... inquiry officer, mentally illness being one of the disabilities under section 2(i) of the act, 1995, under section 47 it was not open to the respondents to dispense with, or reduce in rank of the appellant, who acquired a disability during his ..... medical board or superintendent of the public hospital on the ground that he is medically unfit because of that particular disability. 15. section 47 of the persons with disabilities act, 1995 reads as under:- section 47. non-discrimination in government employments -(1) no establishment shall dispense with, or reduce in rank, an employee who acquires ..... patel vs. district primary education officer (supra) the hon'ble supreme court has again considered the rigor of the mandate of the provisions of section 47 of the persons with disabilities act ,1995 and has recorded in paragraph 18 as follows:- therefore, even it is presumed that the appellant became insane, as held by the .....

K. Dhanasekaran Vs. State by Inspector of Police, C.B., C.i.D.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC223

..... document with the signatures of p.w.1 was sent to him for examination. in the absence of an order from the magistrate concerned under section 5 of the identification of prisoners act, corroborative evidence either direct or circumstantial and in the light ofstatement of p.w.8, i am satisfied that the conclusion arrived based on the ..... occasions at the behest of the bureau, they were never taken before or under the order of a magistrate in accordance with section 5 of the identification of prisoners act. it is true that under section 4 thereof police is competent to take fingerprints of the accused but to dispel any suspicion as to its bona fides or to ..... -p.w.12. he further contended that the charges framed against the accused are clear and there is no discrepancy. according to him, compliance of section 5 of the identification of prisoners act, 1920 is not mandatory and it is only directory.4. i have carefully considered the rival submissions.5. as regards the contention that the charges .....

Sonvir @ Somvir Vs. The State of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... held the evidence to be inadmissible. 14 punishable 28. there is yet another argument which needs to be considered with respect to section 4 of the identification of prisoners act, 1920. the section empowers a police officer to take measurements of a person who has been arrested in connection with an offence rigorous imprisonment for ..... must be ruled out of evidence. the contention appears to be 84. misconceived because in the state of rajasthan, the police were competent under section 4 of the identification of prisoners act, to take the specimen fingerprints of the accused, and this they did, in the instant case, before the superintendent of police, shri k. ..... offence?. in the decision reported as air1976sc69mahmood 13 vs state of uttar pradesh, specimen finger print impressions taken by the investigating officer under section 4 of the identification of prisoners act, 1920, in the absence of a manner prescribed for taking the finger print impressions, was held to be a case of evidence not .....

Parveen Kumar Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4583; I(2002)DMC486

..... his conditional release on licence under section 2 of the good conduct prisoners probational release act, 1926 read with rule 9 of the good conduct prisoners probational release rules, 1927. by virtue of punjab re-organisation act, 1966 particularly section 89 thereof the provisions of the good conduct prisoners probational release act, 1926 and the rules of 1927 ..... articles 226/227 of the constitution of india, he has prayed for the grant of conditional release on licence under section 2 of good conduct prisoners probational release act, 1926 read with rules of 1927.facts :2. parveen kumar-petitioner, his father, mother and sister were tried for offences under ..... order annexure p-5 is quashed and the respondents are directed to reconsider his case for conditional release under section 2 of the good conduct prisoners' probational release act, 1926 read with the good conduct prisoners' probational release rules, 1927 within three months of the receipt of copy of this order.12. petition allowed .....

Darbari Panjara Vs. Bhoti Roy

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1914Cal452,(1914)ILR41Cal915

..... the district court, and the court of the commissioner is constituted the high court in relation to all suits tried in the courts of officers appointed under section 2 of act xxxvii of 1855. the position plainly is that the legislature contemplated the establishment of two entirely distinct series of courts in the son that parganas, each invested ..... cases, as the question raised before us must be determined in view of the nature of the constitution of the courts in the sonthal parganas established under section 2 of the sonthal parganas act, 1855. the view we take is in accord with that adopted in golam najaf miah v. panchanan gupta (1909) 19 c.l.j. 292.5 ..... subject.4. the question now arises, whether it is competent to this court to interfere in the exercise of the powers conferred on it by section 15 of the indian high courts act, 1861. this power of superintendence can be exercised only over courts which are subject to the appellate jurisdiction of the high court. the question is .....

Narne Gopikrishna and Another Vs. State of A.P. Rep by Public Prosecut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... . further, in shankaria v. state of rajasthan (air 1978 sc 1248), when it was contended by the appellant therein that in view of section 5 of the identification of prisoners act, it was incumbent on the police to obtain the specimen thumb impression of the appellant before a magistrate, and since that was not done, ..... the finger prints of the accused were not taken with the permission of the magistrate in accordance with section 5 of the identification of prisoners act, 1920, and further observed that though under section 4 of the identification of prisoners act, 1920, police are competent to take finger prints of the accused, to dispel any suspicion as to ..... aman v. babu khan (air 1997 sc 2960)and submitted that finger prints were taken without obtaining permission from the magistrate as contemplated under section 5 of the identification of prisoners act, 1920, and as such the same is inadmissible in evidence and cannot be looked into and the conviction of the accused based on such evidence .....

Narne Gopikrishna and Another Vs. State of A.P. Rep by Public Prosecut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... permission of the magistrate. further, in shankaria v. state of rajasthan5, when it was contended by the appellant therein that in view of section 5 of the identification of prisoners act, it was incumbent on the police to obtain the specimen thumb impression of the appellant before a magistrate, and since that was not done, ..... the finger prints of the accused were not taken with the permission of the magistrate in accordance with section 5 of the identification of prisoners act, 1920, and further observed that though under section 4 of the identification of prisoners act, 1920, police are competent to take finger prints of the accused, to dispel any suspicion as to ..... supra) and mohd. aman v. babu khan4 and submitted that finger prints were taken without obtaining permission from the magistrate as contemplated under section 5 of the identification of prisoners act, 1920, and as such the same is inadmissible in evidence and cannot be looked into and the conviction of the accused based on such .....