Skip to content


Priority - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: priority Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 10,615 results (0.069 seconds)
Mar 25 1996 (FN)

United States Vs. Reorganized Cfandi Fabricators of Utah, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-25-1996

..... because categorical subordination at the same level of generality assumed by congress in establishing relative priorities among creditors was tantamount to a legislative act and therefore was outside the scope ..... distinct from ranking within one of them the principle is simply that categorical reordering of priorities that takes place at the legislative level of consideration is beyond the scope of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 1996 (FN)

United States Vs. Noland

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-13-1996

..... may not equitably subordinate claims on a categorical basis in derogation of congress s priorities scheme the language of 510 c principles of statutory construction and legislative history clearly ..... equitable exception nonetheless just such a legislative type of decision underlies the reordering of priorities here the sixth circuit s decision runs directly counter to congress s policy judgment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 1996 (SC)

imperial Chit Funds (P) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Ernakulam

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-19-1996

Reported in: 1996IIIAD(SC)488; AIR1996SC1887; I(1996)BC659(SC); [1996]86CompCas555(SC); (1996)133CTR(SC)505; [1996]219ITR498(SC); JT1996(3)SC410; 1996(1)KLT699(SC); 1996(3)SCALE20; (199

..... the companies act and therefore there was no question of any priority in the distribution of assets in view of some subsequent ..... the income tax act affects or alters the existing law of priority or overrides the provisions of preferential payment provided in section ..... decision of the andhra pradesh high court wherein the plea for priority of tax demands particularly income tax was dealt with and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 10 1996 (SC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Sharma Coal Co.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-10-1996

Reported in: 1996(5)SCALE199; (1996)10SCC94; [1996]Supp2SCR850

..... to e sponsored coal movement was mentioned in category c priority and priority e would include non sponsored coal subsequently by proceedings dated ..... of the order had given direction observing that after all the priorities enumerated in the scheme are exhausted and if the wagons ..... unutilized the wagons may be kept at the disposal of non priority articles for carriage thus this appeal came to be filed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 09 1996 (HC)

Anil Kumar Khurana Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-09-1996

Reported in: 62(1996)DLT313

..... the cases of unauthorised construction which affect rights light ventilation passage etc of neighbors second priority a cases of unauthorised construction effected by any structure or coming in the right of ..... of powers by the authorities and whether the buildings in question would come under a priority category would again be decided arbitrarily by the authorities the learned senior counsel relied .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 01 1996 (TRI)

M/S. Hero Honda Motors Ltd. Vs. Kannegolla Venkata Vani and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Jul-01-1996

..... the vehicle to the complainant the opposite parties allotted the vehicle to the individuals whose priority number was subsequent to that of the complainant he therefore submitted relying on the decision ..... the absence of these particulars it cannot be said that the opposite parties overlooked the priority of the complainant and delivered vehicles to the persons whose names were registered far below .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 11 1996 (HC)

Advocates' Association, Bangalore Vs. the Chief Minister, Government o ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-11-1996

Reported in: AIR1997Kant18; 1997(1)KarLJ474

..... submitted that the executive should have the discretion to implement their projects as per the priorities set by the state legislature and the claim of the petitioner association pertains to an ..... court to direct the executive to spend on item s of expenditure without reference to priorities determined by the state legislature he further submitted that the state has made alternative arrangements .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 1996 (HC)

Mahakali Milling Company Pvt. Ltd. and Etc. Vs. Food Corporation of In ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Sep-30-1996

..... the stock of two months with them to be supplied under priority sector it was further stated that the petitioners had deposited the ..... this scheme ii imported food grain stocks must be given top priority for liquidation iii sale of food grains under this scheme should ..... regarding the total lifting of wheat both under government scheme under priority sector and open sale of the figures are as follow for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 19 1996 (SC)

Ashok Leyland Ltd., Madras Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-19-1996

Reported in: [1997]224ITR122(SC); JT1996(11)SC738; 1996(9)SCALE725; (1997)1SCC729; [1996]Supp10SCR467

..... gross total income includes any profits and gains attributable to any priority industry there shall be allowed in accordance with and subject to ..... in computing the total income of the company 5 the expression priority industry occurring in the said section was defined in sub ..... of the ashok leylands trucks it was intimately connected with the priority industry set up and being run by the assessee the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 26 1996 (TRI)

D and H Secheron Electrodes (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Indore

Decided on: Mar-26-1996

Reported in: (1997)60ITD27Indore

..... year s depreciation and carry forward business losses the inter se priority between different kinds of allowances as admissible under the act should ..... argued that losses which get time barred earlier should be given priority for set off over those losses which have longer period ..... which has shorter life for set off should be given first priority in this connection he placed reliance on the decision of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //