Preventively - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: preventively Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 304 results (0.032 seconds)Costao Fernandes, Preventive Officer, Customs Vs. the State at the Ins ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-20-1995
Reported in: 1997BomCR(Cri)885
..... revenue intelligence marmagao approached me and told me that his one preventive officer by name constancio fernandes had been working on some ..... of or in pursuance of the official duties as a preventive officer under the customs act therefore the contention of the ..... 1973 section 400 revisional powers of high court trial of preventive officer for inflicting injury leading to death prima facie opinion .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Laura Britto Vs. V.C.D. Singh Secretary Preventive Detention and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-01-1995
Reported in: 1996(3)BomCR265; 1996CriLJ371
..... to the government of maharashtra under section 3 1 of the prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act ..... detenu and the need to detain him in order to prevent him from re indulging in the said prejudicial activities since ..... petition allowed criminal habeas corpus sections 3 1 and 3 3 of prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHaryana State Electricity Board Vs. Haryana State Board for Prevention ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-17-1995
Reported in: (1995)109PLR756
..... assan panipat the third respondent is the assessing authority under section 6 of the water prevention and control of pollution cases act 1977 hereinafter called the act the second respondent is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Rajee George Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise (Preventiv ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-18-1995
Reported in: 1996CriLJ1174; 1995LC215(Kerala)
ordern dhinakar j 1 this is a petition to quash the proceedings in c c no 78 of 1990 pending...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRup Chand JaIn Vs. Collector of Customs (Preventive)
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-31-1995
Reported in: 1996(88)ELT335(Cal)
k c agrawal c j 1 this is a reference made at the instance of rup chand jain hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India an ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-09-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC1236; JT1995(2)SC110; 1995(1)SCALE539; (1995)2SCC161; [1995]1SCR1036
..... it would be strange if the first amendment aimed at protecting and furthering communications prevented the government from making radio communication possible by requiring licenses to broadcast and by ..... and a variety of views these free speech goals require positive legislative provision to prevent the domination of the broadcasting authorities by the government or by private corporations and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBennis Vs. Michigan
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-29-1995
..... also serves a deterrent purpose distinct from any punitive purpose forfeiture of property prevents illegal uses both by preventing further illicit use of the property and by imposing an economic penalty ..... liability for corporate officer based on company s conduct impermissible if officer was powerless to prevent or correct the violation citation omitted in this case petitioner did not entrust the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRubIn Vs. Coors Brewing Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-19-1995
..... that congress actually intended the f aaa to achieve the far different purpose of preventing brewers from making inaccurate claims concerning alcohol content according to respondent when congress passed ..... government unlike the situation in edge broadcasting the policies of some states do not prevent neighboring states from pursuing their own alcohol related policies within their respective borders .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMcintyre Vs. Ohio Elections Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-19-1995
..... 09 a s anonymous speech ban is not justified by ohio s asserted interests in preventing fraudulent and libelous statements and in providing the electorate with relevant information the claimed informational ..... handbill written by a private citizen unknown to the reader moreover the state interest in preventing fraud and libel which ohio vindicates by means of other more direct prohibitions does not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.M. Vijayan and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-1995
Reported in: [1995]215ITR371(Mad)
..... the impugned provision founded its classification had no rational relationship to its object viz the prevention of the evasion of the tax the impugned provision did not therefore violate article 14 ..... by article 14 of the constitution inasmuch as the classification is reasonable an attempt to prevent by legislation an evasion of just tax liability and the necessary classification to give effect .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial