Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: prevention of terrorism act 2002 repealed section 4 possession of certain unauthorized arms etc Page 4 of about 88 results (0.266 seconds)

Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman Sheikh, Vs. the State of Maharashtra throu ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR391; 2007(6)BomCR294

..... after the enactment of the mcoca, the indian parliament enacted the prevention of terrorism act (for short, 'pota'). the mcoca became inoperative because pota was intended to curb terrorism and insurgency. subsequently pota was repealed on account of its misuse and unlawful activities prevention (amendment) act, 2004 was enacted and incorporated in the unlawful activities prevention act, 1967 (for short, 'uapa 1967'). the new provisions incorporated in uapa ..... , 1967 which intend to curb terrorism and insurgency like pota have made the .....

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... cases, has also been highlighted. it was also stated that it is a near impossibility to get bail as under the uapa, tada act, or the prevention of terrorism act, 200292.5. mr. mukul rohatgi, learned senior counsel was next to argue on behalf of private parties. he urged that the ..... prevention) act, 1986; section 21 of the maharashtra control of organised crime act, 1999; section 22 of the karnataka control of organized crime act, 2000; section 21 of the telangana control of organized crime act, 2001 (renamed from andhra pradesh coca, 2001); section 18 of the sikkim anti-drugs act, 2006; section 20 of the gujrat control of terrorism and organised crime act ..... of section 49b section 49b relating to prohibition of dealings in trophies, animals articles, etc., derived from scheduled animals. paragraph7offences under the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 (104 of 1956) section description of offence 5. procuring, inducing or taking person for the sake of prostitution.6. detaining a person in .....

State (N.C.T. of Delhi) Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC3820; 2005CriLJ3950; 122(2005)DLT194(SC); (2005)11SCC600

..... to contradict the witnesses. such confessions are excluded for the reason that there is a grave risk of their statements being involuntary and false. section prevention of terrorism act, which unusually starts with a proviso, lifts the ban against the admissibility of the confession/statement made to the police to a limited extent by ..... material object is subsequent to the information leading to discovery. the learned counsel reinforces his argument by stating that in the context and setting of section prevention of terrorism act and in the company of the word 'discover', fact only means the object, its location and concealment. the entire definition of 'fact' should not ..... be bodily lifted into section prevention of terrorism act. the fact discovered is the concealment or disposal of the object which is brought to light by the accused, but not anything relating to the .....

A (Fc) and Others (Fc) (Appellants) Vs. Secretary of State for the Hom ...

Court : House of Lords

..... by an order (the terrorism act 2000 (proscribed organisations) (amendment) order 2001 (si 2001/1261)) made on 28 march 2001 and coming into force on the following day. 202. the 2000 act did not provide for exclusion orders of the type permitted by section 5 of the prevention of terrorism (temporary provisions) act 1989 or for detention of ..... detain a foreign national who had not been charged with a criminal offence and wished to leave the uk could readily be defended as tending to prevent him committing acts of terrorism aimed at the uk. assuming, as one must, that there is a public emergency threatening the life of the nation, measures which derogate ..... the type permitted by section 36 of the northern ireland (emergency provisions) act 1996. both those statutes were repealed. (large scale .....

Saquib Abdul Hameed Nachan Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR895; 2005(1)MhLj771

..... , needs reframing and accordingly by consent of all, the following questions were reframed for adjudication by this court. q.1) whether section 32 of the prevention of terrorism act 2002 so provides that a confession/statement made under that section by an accused person can be used as a substantive piece of evidence against the other ..... , j.1. writ petition no. 1742 of 2004 is filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the judgment and order passed by the special court under prevention of terrorism act 2002 (hereinafter referred to as pota 2002 for the sake of brevity) rejecting the application of the petitioner for directing inquiry into the encounter dated 29-03 ..... aspect of the interpretation of law.27. the basic purpose and aim and object of parliament of india was common through out this time. it is to prevent terrorism activities in india, therefore, they first legislated tada in 1987 and made a confessional statement by an accused in a particular way provided in section 15 thereof, .....

Dropti Devi and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... criminal law for addressing terrorism concerns and dangerous sex offenders. the preventive detention order permits detention of a person for a short period of time ..... 1984 was upheld and after anthony salerno and vincent cafaro 13 preventive detention laws were adopted in number of u.s. states but the said procedure has been used sparingly and in u.k. under the prevention of terrorism (temporary provisions) act, 1984 a person may be detained upto 7 days.in australia preventive detention orders and prohibited conduct orders are two mechanisms available under .....

Prakash Kumar @ Prakash Bhutto Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD(Cri)594; 2005CriLJ929; JT2005(11)SC209; (2005)2SCC409; 2005(1)LC446(SC)

..... matters have been placed before this bench.4. the terrorist and disruptive activities (prevention) act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the act) is a piece of legislation containing 30 sections. though miniature legislation, the act tends to be very harsh and drastic containing the stringent provisions to combat the menace of terrorism which has taken an endemic form indulging in wanton killings, arson, looting of ..... reasons as referred to above are manifestly evident that such extra-ordinary act was made to deal with extra-ordinary situation for the prevention of, and for coping with, terrorist and disruptive activities and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.12. the term 'terrorism' has not been defined under the act. this court in hitendra vishnu thakur v.state of maharashtra : 1995crilj517 as .....

Roberts (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. Parole Board (Respondents)

Court : House of Lords

..... procedure were to be contained in a statutory instrument subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either house. the schedule to the prevention of terrorism act 2005 contains detailed provisions governing the making of procedural rules, varying the ordinary rules of procedural fairness, in the context of control orders. ..... interests of the prisoner. (3) the northern ireland (remission of sentences) act 1995 came into force on 17 november 1995 (si 1995/2945) and was significantly amended by the terrorism act 2000. section 1(3) of the 1995 act empowered the secretary of state to revoke the licence of a person released ..... significant a departure from ordinary standards of procedural fairness. 27. schedule 3 to the terrorism act 2000, governing the proscribed organisations appeal commission, contained provisions very similar to those already noted in the special immigration appeals commission act 1997, including (in paragraph 7) provision for special advocates, and was followed by .....

Anas Abdul Rashid MachiswalA. Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

..... therefore, of the view that the ends of justice would be met if the above appellants are imposed sentence of life imprisonment under sec. 3[2][b] of the prevention of terrorism act, 2002 instead of ten years' ri and fine of rs.5000/- as imposed by the learned special judge [pota] u/s.3[1] of pota.22. in ..... 2003. as the investigation was conducted by h.p. agrawat, police inspector, crime branch in respect of the tiffin bomb blasts, subsequently, on 19.7.2003, provisions of prevention of terrorism act were invoked and, therefore, he was handed over the investigation. some of the accused were arrested by p.i. shri agrawat but with regard to offence registered in kalupur ..... 2006, 1151 of 2006 and 1155 of 2006 are preferred by the appellants who are convicted by the special [pota] court and sentenced under section 3[1] of the prevention of terrorism act, 2002 ["pota" for short] to undergo ri for a period of ten years and fine of rs. 5000/- each, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a .....

R.C. Sabharwal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT362

..... procedure and not whether an interlocutory order could be challenged by way of a petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure.35. section 34 of prevention of terrorism act, 2002 to the extent it is relevant provides as under:34. appeal- (^notwithstanding anything contained in the code, an appeal shall lie from any judgment, sentence ..... charge in a corruption case is an interlocutory order.4. after examining the provisions of section 19(3)(c) of prevention of corruption act, 1988, section 11 of special courts act, 1979 and section 34 of prevention of terrorism act, the court was of the view that they are pari materia with each other and held that the order on ..... ble supreme court in v.c. shukla's case and comparing the provisions of section 19(3)(c)of prevention of corruption act with those contained in section 11 (i) of special courts act and section 34 of prevention of terrorism act, 2002 and i feel that holding such an order to be a final or intermediate order and those .....