Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: prevention of terrorism act 2002 repealed section 4 possession of certain unauthorized arms etc Court: delhi Page 1 of about 37 results (0.141 seconds)

Virbhadra Singh & Anr vs.enforcement Directorate & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... secrets act, 1923; prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 (since replaced by food safety and standards act, 2006); the customs act, 1962; narcotics drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985; prevention of corruption act, 1988; maharashtra control of organized crime act, 1999; prevention of terrorism act, 2002 and protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 ..... secrets act, 1923; prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 (since replaced by food safety and standards act, 2006); the customs act, 1962; narcotics drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985; prevention of corruption act, 1988; maharashtra control of organized crime act, 1999; prevention of terrorism act, 2002 and protection of children from sexual offences act, ..... connected matters page 41 of 101 54. to quickly expound on the above, it may be mentioned that the provisions of prevention of terrorism act, 2002 (since repealed) created new offences (sections 3, 4 and6) which were classified by section 49 to be cognizable .....

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Delhi vs.axis Bank & O ...

Court : Delhi

..... ascertain the safeguards against unjust effect of such power vis- -vis third party claimants.95. the uapa was amended by act no.29 of 2004 simultaneous to the repeal of the prevention of terrorism act, 2002 ("pota", for short). the amendment brought on the statute book (by insertion of fifth chapter), provisions for ..... "forfeiture" of "proceeds of terrorism", a later amendment (by act no.3 of 2013) adding to such measures the "forfeiture" of "any property" intended to be "used for terrorism". the ..... the indian penal code, 1860 (ipc) besides some offences under special laws such as narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, explosive substances act, 1908, unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967, prevention of corruption act, 1988, etc.56. there are three parts of the definition of proceeds of crime . the distinct flavor of each .....

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement vs.state Bank of India ...

Court : Delhi

..... ascertain the safeguards against unjust effect of such power vis- -vis third party claimants.95. the uapa was amended by act no.29 of 2004 simultaneous to the repeal of the prevention of terrorism act, 2002 ("pota", for short). the amendment brought on the statute book (by insertion of fifth chapter), provisions for ..... "forfeiture" of "proceeds of terrorism", a later amendment (by act no.3 of 2013) adding to such measures the "forfeiture" of "any property" intended to be "used for terrorism". the ..... the indian penal code, 1860 (ipc) besides some offences under special laws such as narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, explosive substances act, 1908, unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967, prevention of corruption act, 1988, etc.56. there are three parts of the definition of proceeds of crime . the distinct flavor of each .....

Directorate of Enforcement vs.punjab National Bank & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... ascertain the safeguards against unjust effect of such power vis- -vis third party claimants.95. the uapa was amended by act no.29 of 2004 simultaneous to the repeal of the prevention of terrorism act, 2002 ("pota", for short). the amendment brought on the statute book (by insertion of fifth chapter), provisions for ..... "forfeiture" of "proceeds of terrorism", a later amendment (by act no.3 of 2013) adding to such measures the "forfeiture" of "any property" intended to be "used for terrorism". the ..... the indian penal code, 1860 (ipc) besides some offences under special laws such as narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, explosive substances act, 1908, unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967, prevention of corruption act, 1988, etc.56. there are three parts of the definition of proceeds of crime . the distinct flavor of each .....

Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement vs.idbi Bank Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... ascertain the safeguards against unjust effect of such power vis- -vis third party claimants.95. the uapa was amended by act no.29 of 2004 simultaneous to the repeal of the prevention of terrorism act, 2002 ("pota", for short). the amendment brought on the statute book (by insertion of fifth chapter), provisions for ..... "forfeiture" of "proceeds of terrorism", a later amendment (by act no.3 of 2013) adding to such measures the "forfeiture" of "any property" intended to be "used for terrorism". the ..... the indian penal code, 1860 (ipc) besides some offences under special laws such as narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, explosive substances act, 1908, unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967, prevention of corruption act, 1988, etc.56. there are three parts of the definition of proceeds of crime . the distinct flavor of each .....

Union of India vs.punjab National Bank

Court : Delhi

..... ascertain the safeguards against unjust effect of such power vis- -vis third party claimants.95. the uapa was amended by act no.29 of 2004 simultaneous to the repeal of the prevention of terrorism act, 2002 ("pota", for short). the amendment brought on the statute book (by insertion of fifth chapter), provisions for ..... "forfeiture" of "proceeds of terrorism", a later amendment (by act no.3 of 2013) adding to such measures the "forfeiture" of "any property" intended to be "used for terrorism". the ..... the indian penal code, 1860 (ipc) besides some offences under special laws such as narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, explosive substances act, 1908, unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967, prevention of corruption act, 1988, etc.56. there are three parts of the definition of proceeds of crime . the distinct flavor of each .....

Bachraj Bengani @ B.R. JaIn Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2204; 110(2004)DLT233; 2004(73)DRJ399

d.k. jain, j.rule d.b.1. in this appeal filed under section 34 of the prevention of terrorism act, 2002 (for short 'pota') the short question for consideration is whether an appeal under the said section is maintainable against an order framing charge in a trial conducted ..... usual law and order problem within a state. on the other hand, it is interstate, inter-national or cross-border in character. fight against the overt and covert acts of terrorism is not a regular criminal justice endeavor. rather it is defense of our nation and its citizens. it is a challenge to the hole nation and indivisible force of ..... or individuals, trained, inspired and supported by fundamentalists and anti-indian elements were trying to destabilize the country. this new breed of menace was hitherto unheard of. terrorism is definitely a criminal act, but it is much more than mere criminality. today, the government is charged with the duty of protecting the unity, integrity, secularism and sovereignty of india from .....

State (Gnct of Delhi) Vs. Sidhartha Vashisht

Court : Delhi

..... india as public interest litigation. in pucl v. union of india, 2003 (10) scale 96 while dealing with the validity of section 30 of the prevention of terrorism act, 2002, the supreme court referred to in detail to witnesses protection and to the need to maintain a just balance between the rights of the accused ..... report for amending various statutes, civil and criminal. that report dealt with hostile witnesses and the precautions the police should take at the stage of investigation to prevent prevarication by witnesses when they are examined later at the trial. the commission recommended three alternatives, (in modification of the two alternatives suggested in the 154th ..... after case, when witnesses who are considered bulwarks of the prosecution version turn turtle and do not support the state. a case by case approach, to contain, prevent, and eliminate altogether, such events, has to be adopted. witnesses who need to be supported, and protected from threats of harm to themselves, or their .....

R.C. Sabharwal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT362

..... procedure and not whether an interlocutory order could be challenged by way of a petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure.35. section 34 of prevention of terrorism act, 2002 to the extent it is relevant provides as under:34. appeal- (^notwithstanding anything contained in the code, an appeal shall lie from any judgment, sentence ..... charge in a corruption case is an interlocutory order.4. after examining the provisions of section 19(3)(c) of prevention of corruption act, 1988, section 11 of special courts act, 1979 and section 34 of prevention of terrorism act, the court was of the view that they are pari materia with each other and held that the order on ..... ble supreme court in v.c. shukla's case and comparing the provisions of section 19(3)(c)of prevention of corruption act with those contained in section 11 (i) of special courts act and section 34 of prevention of terrorism act, 2002 and i feel that holding such an order to be a final or intermediate order and those .....

State Vs. Bashir Ahmed Ponnu and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... in the decision reported as 206 (2014) dlt578(db) raees-uz-zama & anr. vs. state nct of delhi considering a paramateria provision section 3(5) of prevention of terrorism act, 2002 (pota) held that from the conduct, nature and quantum of recoveries made and the interaction of a2 and a3 therein with a1 without doubt makes them a ..... funds as a terrorist gang to facilitate the commission of a terrorist activity and are thus convicted for the offence punishable under section 17 of the unlawful activities prevention act. h. from the evidence on record it has also been proved beyond reasonable doubt that all the four respondents i.e. bashir ahmed ponnu, fayaz ahmed lone ..... that there may not be any occasion to suspect fair and impartial investigation. in the present case, since the offences under the provisions of the unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967 were also involved, the investigation was required to be conducted by an officer not below the rank of acp. pw-24 acp sanjeev kumar though a .....