Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: preservation of trees act 1976 chapter 1 preliminary Court: chennai Page 16 of about 245 results (0.106 seconds)

Jul 07 1994 (HC)

S. Arumugam Vs. the Commissioner of Police Madras and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1995CriLJ194

..... it is just mentioned, in all these cases, that the detention orders had been made against the detenus concerned, under section 3(1) of tamil nadu act 14 of 1982. then, in all the three cases, details of the ground crimes are stated. following paragraphs are as follows : ------------------------------------------------------------------------ veeramani's case h ..... order. merely because a person is a bootlegger, drug-offender, forest-offender, goonda, immoral traffic offender or a slumgrabber falling within the definition under act 14 or 1982, it will not be necessary to detain him preventively, unless the detaining authority arrives at his subjective satisfaction on the need as ..... as 'goonda', without recording his reasons for holding him as such. further, the detaining authority, in view of the definition of 'goonda' under the act, must have specifically recorded about the habit of the petitioner in involving himself in crimes of similar nature. all that not having been done, impugned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 1976 (HC)

A.K. Thaga Pillai and ors. Vs. Superintendent, Regulated Market of the ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1977CriLJ1375

..... reported in state of west bengal v. howrah municipality : [1972]2scr874a , their lordships after elaborately discussing the scope of section 5 of the limitation act, held that the words 'sufficient cause' should receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice when no negligence or inaction or want of bona ..... on the part of the prosecution to come forward with proper and acceptable explanation, explaining each days delay; (2) as rule 141 of the said act, empowers the statutory authorities to recover the said amounts in an alternative proceedings (i.e.) by instituting civil proceedings, quashing of these statutorily delayed criminal ..... complainant has filed an application for condonation of the delay contending that the agricultural market committee is a statutory body established by the government under the act and it has to launch prosecution after getting sanction from the committee and has to gather information from other sources regarding the transaction and that under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1976 (HC)

Thankaswamy Padayachi and anr. Vs. Sridharan

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1977CriLJ697

..... the evidence adduced in this case is not sufficient warranting the lower court to pass such an order.3. sections 129 to 148 under chapter x of the criminal procedure code, 1973 (act ii of 1974), deal with maintenance of public order and tranquillity in general, of which sections 145 to 148 come under the sub-heading 'd' (disputes as to ..... high courts also hold that the magistrate could make only 6 prohibitory order in the negative form forbidding the doing of an act, but it could not make any order directing the doing of any positive or particular act viz., a mandatory injunction ordering the removal or demolition of any obstruction set up. but the other high courts held the ..... finds that there is a likelihood of breach of peace and that it is due prima facie to the wrongful act of a person, he can, by invoking these sections, direct that wrong-doer to desist from doing the wrongful act. it is well-settled that in passing such an order under these sections, the magistrate must bear in mind .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2016 (HC)

Sugesan Transport Pvt.Ltd., Chennai Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of ...

Court : Chennai

..... of his sound wisdom, the high court will be a laughing stock in the eyes of the public. to obviate this dichotomy, it will be well advised to preserve the powers of the high court to quash the fir, rather than to assume a non-existing power of stepping into the shoes of the station house officer and ..... the police do not register an fir, the magistrate can initiate prosecution against the station house officer under section 21 read with section 44 of the district police act before the chief metropolitan magistrate or the chief judicial magistrate. such a prosecution can also be launched by the complainant before the chief metropolitan magistrate or the chief ..... , for all purposes in this act contained, be considered to be always on duty and shall have the powers of a police-officer in every part of the general police district. it shall be his duty to use his best endeavours and ability to prevent all crimes, offences and public nuisances; to preserve the peace; to apprehend disorderly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 2012 (HC)

A. Rajalakshmi and Others Vs. Sengammal and Others

Court : Chennai

..... date of filing of the suit, till the date of handing over possession; (v) that insofar as the mesne profits arising out of the cutting and removing of trees in the suit properties, which became the subject matter of i.a.no.1122 of 1993, separate proceedings under order xx, rule 12, cpc, may have to be ..... parties, the underlying purpose was the impending amendment to the land reforms legislation. therefore, the contention that the documents were sham and nominal and not intended to be acted upon, appears to be true. 100. it is true that there are serious restrictions to oral evidence being allowed, to disprove the contents of registered documents. but ..... the properties including those covered by the documents dated 25.2.1970 were under unified command and control of a single person. if the documents had really been acted upon, the centralised command could have actually broken. 99. moreover, one common denominator in the pleadings of both parties, relates to the purpose for which the documents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1918 (PC)

The Midnapore Zemindari Company, Limited Through Its Duly Authorized M ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1918)34MLJ563

..... monohur deo (1864) w.r. 39, * * * *' ' when an estate is freed from its connection with a public office, the reason arising from that connection for the preservation of the estate, intact and unencumbered, necessarily fails. there is not in the lands themselves, according to hindu law, any inherent quality limiting them to special kinds of ownership and ..... not mentioned in this exhibit, but from exhibit d3 (b) it appears that he and four or five other palayagars were to come with their respective men and act as an escort of ' old lucki naick ' in conducting him from komaravadi as soon as the arrest of this escaped prisoner was effected.12. so much for ..... vi of 1831, but as will be pointed out later, the general statutory prohibition was repealed before the date of the alienations now in question by madras act iii of 1895, and the limited prohibition contained in that enactment does not affect the present case. the further contention that the subsequent enfranchisement of the land from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1918 (PC)

The Midnapore Zemindari Company Limited Vs. Appayasami Naicker and anr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1918)ILR41Mad749

..... monohur deo (1864) w.r., 39. * * * * 'when an estate is freed from its connexion with a public office, the reason arising from that connexion for the preservation of the estate intact and unencumbered, necessarily fails. there is not in the lands themselves, according to hindu law, any inherent quality limiting them to special kinds of ownership and ..... s grand-father died on 16th july 1899. on 14th march 1900 the bank applied for an order absolute for sale under section 89 of the transfer of property act, and on 21st march 1900 the court made the order as follows. 'defendant by mr. subramania ayyar does not put forward any objection. decree made absolute'. ..... vi of 1831, but as will be pointed out later, the general statutory prohibition was repealed before the date of the alienations now in question by madras act iii of 1895, and the limited prohibition contained in that enactment does not affect the present case. the further contention that the subsequent enfranchisement of the land from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1936 (PC)

The Rajah of Vizianagaram Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Coun ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1936)71MLJ873

..... persons, it is of the utmost importance to consider, what the object is which the legislature may be presumed to have intended. the abject of the act is to preserve the estate of a disqualified proprietor, and how is this object achieved or furthered by the court of wards being enabled to assume control over his minor ..... matters concerning the rights of a subject, it would be wrong to hold that valuable rights are taken away by implication. the primary purpose of the act is to preserve and safeguard the property of certain properties and as ancillary to that main purpose, the court of wards is empowered to assume is some cases superintendence of ..... a disqualified proprietor becomes legally incapacitated for all purposes; on the contrary, certain legal rights which he possessed previously, are preserved to him unimpaired. is it to be lightly assumed that a person, who the act declares is capable of exercising such legal rights, as making an adoption or executing a will, is to be treated, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 1980 (HC)

Syed Ahmed Vs. Salima Bi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1980)2MLJ372

..... upon his earlier possession as a tenant.6. in the present case, it is not even stated that the tenancy rights of the petitioner were in any manner preserved to be operative inspite of the sale in his favour under exhibit b-1 dated 30th december, 1964. nor has the petitioner come forward with a case that ..... was with the knowledge of the proceedings initiated by late mohamed zackria. the income from the properties was held to have been expended in the planting of cocoanut trees and maintaining them and the expenses and the income were found to be equal and consequently, it was held that the petitioner was not liable to render, any ..... for the benefit of the petitioner thereafter. an analogous situation with reference to the maintainability of an application for eviction under the provisions of the tamil nadu cultivating tenants protection act xxv of 1955 arose for decision in annamalai goundan v. venkatasami naidu and ors. : air1959mad354 . in that case, after the expiry of the period of lease, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1918 (PC)

The Midnapore Zemindari Company, Limited Vs. Malayandi Appayasami Naic ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 47Ind.Cas.733

..... monohuf deo (1864) w.r. 39. * * * * when an estate is freed from its connection with a public office, the reason arising from that connection for the preservation of the estate, intact and unencumbered, necessarily fails. there is not in the lands themselves, according to hindu law, any inherent quality limiting them 'to special kinds of ownership ..... s grandfather died on 16th july 1899. on,]4th march it00, the bank applied for an order absolute for sale under section- 89 of the transfer of property act, and on 21st march 1900 the court made the order as follows: 'defendant by mr. subramania aiyar does not put forward any objection. decree made absolute'. the ..... vi of 1831, but as will be pointed out later, the general statutory prohibition was repealed before the date of the alienations now in question by madras act iii of 1895, and the limited prohibition contained in that enactment does not affect the present case. the further contention that the subsequent enfranchisement of the land .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //