Present - Year 1986 - Judgments

Jul 29 1986 (SC)

Sonam Yongda (Ex-captain) Presently Detained in Hazaribagh Central Jai ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-29-1986

Reported in: AIR1986SC1736,1986CriLJ1606,1986(2)SCALE123,(1986)3SCC594

..... desh and u s a in kathmandu and that kiran kumar chhetri and others had presented the memorandum dated october 15 1985 under the petitioner s guidance to the prime minister ..... sec that the allegation that the petitioner sent a delegation and that the memorandum was presented under his guidance are both factual inferences drawn from the circumstance that the petitioner was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 18 1986 (HC)

Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-18-1986

Reported in: 1986LC511(Bombay); 1986(26)ELT504(Bom)

..... of clause c is not applicable to this case 10 the second limb might have presented some difficulty however the legal position has now been settled by the supreme court by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 05 1986 (HC)

Mukand Iron and Steel Works Ltd. Vs. V.G. Deshpande Registrar of Trade ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-05-1986

Reported in: 1987(1)BomCR286; [1986(52)FLR367]; (1986)IILLJ290Bom; 1986MhLJ267

..... principles laid down in grindlay bank s case supra can have no application to the present case in the first place it must be noted that the registrar purported to withdraw .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 27 1986 (HC)

Vapson Products and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-27-1986

Reported in: 1987(11)ECC200; 1987(15)LC138(Bombay); 1987(27)ELT608(Bom)

..... show cause notices only for a period of six months the petitioners have filed the present petition to challenge the legality of the orders passed by the two authorities below 3 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 23 1986 (HC)

Silve Impex (Private) Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-23-1986

Reported in: 1988(19)LC474(Bombay); 1986(25)ELT910(Bom)

..... had decided to alter the norms 3 on july 14 1982 the petitioners filed the present petition complaining against the action of the respondents and the petitioners were permitted to clear .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 05 1986 (HC)

Phoenix Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-05-1986

Reported in: 1986(8)ECC164; 1988(19)LC318(Bombay)

..... these applications were turned down and that has given rise to the filing of the present petition on march 13 1985 3 on the date of filing of the petition the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 04 1986 (HC)

Pentax Engineering Pvt. Limited and Another Vs. Union of India and Oth ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-04-1986

Reported in: 1986(10)ECC171; 1989(20)LC480(Bombay); 1986(25)ELT510(Bom)

..... action on the part of the respondents has given rise to the filing of the present petition on april 29 1982 under article 226 of the constitution of india 3 shri .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 1986 (HC)

Mahindra Re-rolls Industries and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-29-1986

Reported in: 1990(25)ECC296; 1988(33)ELT684(Bom)

..... manufacturing flats or bars they had also produced bailing hoops we are not in the present case concerned with the varieties of goods manufactured by the petitioners the point before us .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 1986 (HC)

Godrej Soaps Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-03-1986

Reported in: 1986(10)ECC174; 1986(25)ELT482(Bom)

..... v cibatul ltd the facts of the case before the supreme court and in the present case are almost identical as pointed out by the supreme court in paragraph 6 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 1986 (HC)

Roche Anglo-french Employees' Union, Bombay Vs. Conciliation Officer, ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-13-1986

Reported in: [1985(51)FLR244]; (1987)IILLJ169Bom; 1986MhLJ308

..... bodies failing to perform any public duty with which they have been charged in the present case the writ is admittedly not sought against the respondent no 1 who is the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Present - Judgment Search Results