Skip to content


Predominance - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: predominance Page 1 of about 300 results (0.149 seconds)
Apr 27 1942 (FN)

Prudence Realization Corp. Vs. Geist

Court: US Supreme Court

prudence realization corp v geist 316 u s 89 1942 u s supreme court prudence realization corp v geist 316...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 1945 (FN)

Prudence Realization Corp. Vs. Ferris

Court: US Supreme Court

prudence realization corp v ferris 323 u s 650 1945 u s supreme court prudence realization corp v ferris 323...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 03 1936 (FN)

Prudence Co., Inc. Vs. Fidelity and Deposit Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

prudence co inc v fidelity deposit co 297 u s 198 1936 u s supreme court prudence co inc v...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 1992 (HC)

Chandrakant Chimanlal Shah Vs. Chimanlal Ambalal Shah and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1992)2GLR1411

r k abichandani j 1 the petitioner seeks to challenge the impugned order of the learned city civil judge ahmedabad...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 13 1996 (FN)

Bush Vs. Vera

Court: US Supreme Court

..... strict scrutiny would not be appropriate if race neutral traditional districting considerations predominated over racial ones we have not subjected political gerrymandering to strict scrutiny ..... traditional districting principles and deviate substantially from the hypothetical court drawn district for predominantly racial reasons are unconstitutional see ante at 979 plurality opinion district 30 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 2013 (FN)

Amgen Inc. Vs. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s alleged misrepresentations and omissions is no barrier to finding that common questions predominate see part ii supra if the alleged misrepresentations and omissions are ultimately found ..... to obtain certification of securities fraud class actions without proof that common questions predominate over individualized questions of reliance in contravention of federal rule of civil procedure .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 1997 (FN)

Amchem Products, Inc. Vs. Windsor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy in adding predominance and superiority to the qualification for certification list the advisory committee sought to cover ..... number of individuals and 625 their varying medical expenses smoking histories and family situations predominance is a test readily met in certain cases alleging consumer or securities fraud or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 12 2008 (FN)

Total Network Sl (a Company Incorporated in Spain) (Original Responden ...

Court: House of Lords

..... more than one purpose actuating a combination liability must depend on ascertaining the predominant purpose if that predominant purpose is to damage another person and damage results that is tortious ..... that lord diplock uncharacteristically failed to make a clear distinction between the requirement of predominant purpose under one variety of the tort of conspiracy and the lower requirement of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 20 2013 (FN)

Ppl Corp. Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... may face tax burdens different from the majority of affected taxpayers the challenge in applying predominant character analysis will sometimes lie in determining whether and how such outlier taxpayers affect ..... using price to earnings ratios accordingly incorporating an outlier like railtrack group into the predominant character analysis suggests that the windfall tax is a tax on a company s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 19 1997 (FN)

Abrams Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... not draw the second majority black district without allowing that one consideration to predominate over other traditional and neutral districting principles principles which were a valid expression ..... judges have expressed concerns that the court s holdings and particularly its test predominant racial motive would prove unworkable that they would improperly shift redistricting authority from .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //