Skip to content


Predicable - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: predicable Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 120 results (0.007 seconds)
Sep 10 2004 (HC)

Rdf Projects Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director, M. Venkateshwarlu ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-10-2004

Reported in: 2004(5)ALD701; [2005]124CompCas184(AP); (2005)4CompLJ104(AP); [2005]59SCL311(AP)

n v ramana j 1 this appeal under section 10 f of the companies act 1956 for short the companies...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 2004 (HC)

Manimalan Vs. K. Subrayan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-19-2004

Reported in: AIR2004Mad446; (2004)3MLJ80

orderk gnanaprakasam j 1 this civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 21 10 2003 made in cmp...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 2004 (SC)

Smt. Savita Garg Vs. the Director, National Heart Institute

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-12-2004

Reported in: AIR2004SC5088; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)42; 2004(4)AWC3699(SC); 2004(3)BLJR2145; 2005(3)BomCR430; (2004)4CompLJ255(SC); IV(2004)CPJ40(SC); [2005(1)JCR22(SC)]; JT2004(8)SC607; 2004(3

a k mathur j 1 this appeal is directed against the order passed by the national consumer disputes redressal commission...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2004 (HC)

Jivanbhai Shivabhai Garoda Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Aug-02-2004

Reported in: (2005)1GLR1

bhawani singh c j 1 petitioners were serving in the security force a branch in the indian petrochemicals corporation limited...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 2004 (HC)

Eureka Estates (P) Ltd. Vs. A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Com ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-12-2004

Reported in: AIR2005AP118; 2004(6)ALD212; 2004(6)ALT46

b sudershan reddy j 1 the petitioner invokes the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under article 226 of the constitution...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 01 2004 (HC)

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Thane Municipal Corporation and ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-01-2004

Reported in: AIR2004Bom458; 2004(4)ALLMR33; 2004(4)BomCR590; 2004(3)MhLj883

..... pay there is no dispute in respect of the first two predicates the only issue is in srespect of the third predicate an implied contract is not a written contract the question .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 2004 (SC)

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Bhupinder Singh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-02-2004

Reported in: [2004(101)FLR432]; JT2004(4)SC149; 2004(4)SCALE170; (2004)4SCC213; 2005(1)SLJ10(SC)

..... stage could not anticipate that the madras act would not be amended nor could it predicate what amendments would be carried out or whether they would be of a sweeping character .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2004 (FN)

Tennessee Vs. Lane

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-17-2004

..... congress has constitutionally abrogated a state s eleventh amendment immunity requires resolution of two predicate questions 1 whether congress unequivocally expressed its intent to abrogate and 2 if so ..... evidence that disabled persons were denied constitutionally protected access to judicial proceedings without this predicate showing title ii even if we were to hypothesize that it applies only to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2004 (FN)

Rasul Vs. Bush

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-2004

..... if the custodian can be reached by service of process because braden overruled the statutory predicate to eisentrager s holding eisentrager does not preclude the exercise of 2241 jurisdiction over petitioners ..... be heard at all 410 u s at 499 500 because braden overruled the statutory predicate to eisentrager s holding eisentrager plainly does not preclude the exercise of 2241 jurisdiction over .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 2004 (HC)

E.i.H. Limited Vs. National Capital Territory of Delhi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-05-2004

Reported in: 113(2004)DLT488; 2004(76)DRJ74; [2005(104)FLR8]; (2004)IIILLJ1123Del

..... under section 10 of the i d act 1947 a dispute predicated on the truth or correctness of the facts constituting misconduct ..... enquiry 48 the tribunal had the jurisdiction to decide the challenge predicated on the first ground since field of suspension was covered by ..... misconduct is common where however the matter has to be adjudicated predicated on the truth or correctness of the facts alleged there is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //