Precision - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: precision Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 304 results (0.341 seconds)Fag Precision Bearings Ltd. Vs. Sales Tax Officer (Enforcement)
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-27-2003
Reported in: [2003]131STC298(Guj)
..... 1969 hereby order that the assessment in respect of m s precision bearings india limited baroda who is registered vide registration no ..... passed by the honourable supreme court in the case of fag precision bearings 1997 104 stc 143 he further submitted that why the ..... judgment of the honourable supreme court in the case of fag precision bearings 1997 104 stc 143 and respectfully following the decision .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFag Precision Bearings Ltd. and anr. Vs. Vadodara Municipal Corporatio ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-16-2003
Reported in: [2004]138STC282(Guj)
k a puj j 1 the petitioner by filing this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india has...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinvestment and Precision Casting Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-02-2003
1 shri m j tank learned manager administration appearing for the appellant company states that the impugned order in appeal...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise, Baroda Vs. L.M.P. Precision Eng. Co. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-16-2003
Reported in: 2004(93)ECC137; 2004(163)ELT290(SC); (2004)9SCC703
order1 a question was raised before the tribunal whether water well drilling rigs mounted on motor vehicle chassis fall under...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.S.T. Precision Components Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: (2003)(157)ELT493Tri(Bang.)
2 the counsel submitted that the commissioner appeals has wrongly made observation that the customer is not entitled for refund...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMcConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-10-2003
..... through national party committees rather state committees function as an alternate avenue for precisely the same corrupting forces footnote 59 indeed both candidates and parties already ..... congress purposes functionally meaningless indeed congress enacted the new electioneering communication s provisions precisely because it recognized that the express advocacy test was woefully inadequate at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGrutter Vs. Bollinger
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-23-2003
..... christians only a study in prejudice 53 54 1931 harvard columbia employed intelligence tests precisely because jewish applicants who were predominantly immigrants scored worse on such tests thus columbia ..... groups in proportion to their statistical representation in the applicant pool but this is precisely the type of racial balancing that the court itself calls patently unconstitutional ante at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLockyer Vs. Andrade
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-05-2003
..... s cases lack clarity regarding what factors may indicate gross disproportionality the principle s precise contours are unclear applicable only in the exceedingly rare and extreme case harmelin supra ..... the contrary to or unreasonable application of framework is the gross disproportionality principle the precise contours of which are unclear applicable only in the exceedingly rare and extreme case .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hindustan Tobacco Co.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-16-2003
Reported in: (2003)87ITD129(Kol.)
..... given any satisfactory details about this aspect of the matter nor about precise nature of work done by these boys in fact there is ..... of the calcutta high court in the case of cit v precision finance p ltd supra thus the evidence furnished by the assessee ..... decision of the jurisdictional high court in the case of cit v precision finance p ltd supra and since sufficient opportunity of being heard .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBajaj Auto Ltd. Vs. Bhojane Gopinath D. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-17-2003
Reported in: JT2003(10)SC440; (2004)ILLJ821SC; 2003(10)SCALE77; (2004)9SCC488; 2004(2)SLJ238(SC); 2004(1)LC707(SC)
..... employed by them preamble whereas it is expedient to provide for defining with sufficient precision certain conditions of employment in industrial establishments in the state of bombay and for ..... state legislature amended the title of the 1946 act to provide rules defining with sufficient precision certain conditions of employment in industrial establishments in the state of maharashtra it also .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial