Pre - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: pre Year: 1940 Page 1 of about 941 results (0.071 seconds)Abani Nath Mukhopadhaya and anr. Vs. Amar Nath Mukhopadhaya and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-24-1940
Reported in: AIR1941Cal92
the estate would have passed to his daughter because the presence of sibnarain would have excluded peary mohan or peary mohan
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadhey Lal Vs. Niranjan Nath
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-02-1940
Reported in: AIR1941All95
not amount to a contempt of court we discussed the previous allahabad cases to which reference has already been made in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGurappa Gurushiddappa Neeli Vs. Amarangji Vanichand
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-06-1940
Reported in: AIR1941Bom90; (1941)43BOMLR26
must read the decree as a whole and if a preliminary mortgage decree provided in the first instance that the mortgagor
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. Vs. Ratilal Tribhovandas Thakar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-24-1940
Reported in: AIR1941Bom108; (1941)43BOMLR53
about general principles of law he says that he was present at the interview and that defendant no 3 said that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: the Patiala State Bank
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-10-1940
Reported in: AIR1941Bom93; (1941)43BOMLR84
british india it seems to me that the title the preamble and the operative part of section 2 make it perfectly
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKanhaiyalal Harkarandas Vs. Mohanlal Ramvallabh
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-13-1940
Reported in: AIR1941Bom219; (1941)43BOMLR287
it has been filed for the purpose of bringing undue pressure upon the plaintiff and similar allegations are made in paragraph
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Punjab Co-operative Bank, Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-22-1940
Reported in: (1941)43BOMLR372
be to the federal court but there is no condition precedent imposed on an appeal to his majesty in council in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaneegunj Coal Association Ltd. Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Limited
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-18-1940
Reported in: (1941)43BOMLR403
authoritatively construed and for that purpose the respondents instituted the present suit in which as ultimately settled by the court the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.R.M.C.T.S.S.P.A. Chettyar Firm Vs. U on Maung
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-08-1940
Reported in: (1941)43BOMLR459
for an order calling upon the appellants to produce the press copy book of correspondence from april 1932 to december 1933
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMancherji Pallonji Contractor Vs. Dinbai Nusserwanji Goawalla
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-26-1940
Reported in: AIR1941Bom260; (1941)43BOMLR543
had to be paid into the court of the chief presidency magistrate for distribution by him among the persons entitled it
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial