Skip to content


Ported - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: ported Year: 1925 Page 1 of about 304 results (0.085 seconds)
May 29 1925 (PC)

Port Canning and Land Improvement Company Ltd. Vs. Achhiruddi Mollah a ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-29-1925

Reported in: AIR1926Cal693

..... court of alipur the suit out of which this appeal arises was brought by the port canning and land improvement company ltd as landlords to recover from the defendants who were ..... an agreement as has been pointed out by this court in the case of the port canning and land improvement company limited v narayan chandra pramanik 22 c w n 558 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 1925 (PC)

The Port Canning and Land Improvement Company Limited Vs. Heirs of Lat ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-29-1925

Reported in: 92Ind.Cas.37

..... court of alipur the suit out of which this appeal arises was brought by the port canning and land improvement company ltd as landlords to recover from the defendants who were ..... an agreement as has been pointed out by this court in the case of the port canning and land improvement co ltd v nayan chandra paramanik 45 ind cas 234 22 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 24 1925 (PC)

Supadi Vs. Emperor

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-24-1925

Reported in: 87Ind.Cas.840a

pratt j 1 this appeal has been admitted though time barred and i would deal with it in our revisional...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 23 1925 (PC)

Ardeshar Cowasji Patel Vs. K.D. and Bros.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-23-1925

Reported in: AIR1925Bom330; (1925)27BOMLR553

pratt j 1 plaintiff is a lessee of a plot of land at kirkee measuring 13 639 square yards under...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 07 1925 (PC)

Kunkalagunta Venkiah Vs. Mandlem Guraviah and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-07-1925

Reported in: AIR1926Mad757; 96Ind.Cas.290

charles gordon spencer j 1 these two appeals arise out of connected suits original suit no 1440 of 1919 was...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 30 1925 (PC)

imambhai KamrudIn Vs. Rahimbhai Usmanbhai

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-30-1925

Reported in: (1925)27BOMLR503; 87Ind.Cas.977

other owner either giving his consent or acquiescing ho raised portion of the wall assumes the same character as the old

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 1925 (FN)

Newark Vs. Central R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-02-1925

..... improvements thereon consisting of warehouses slips docks and other facilities of commerce known collectively as port newark terminal that neither the present nor the proposed bridge is necessary to the ..... 43 stat 822 appellants insist that congress by creating and adopting as its instrumentality the port authority qualified the license granted by the united states to the company by imposing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 1925 (FN)

AustIn Nichols and Co. Vs. Steamship isla De Panay

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-02-1925

..... the merchandise should be transported for a stipulated freight to the port of new york and there be delivered to the order of ..... bills of lading issued for said merchandise at seville spain from which port said merchandise was shipped in the first instance that thereafter the ..... the arrival in bad condition of the shippers goods at the port of destination is old and well established and based on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 14 1925 (FN)

United States Vs. New York and Cuba Mail S.S. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-14-1925

..... afflicted with an incurable disease on being brought into an american port could not be admitted into the united states but would have ..... that if any vessel carrying passengers on arrival from a foreign port had on board employed thereon any alien afflicted with any enumerated ..... of placing in hospitals alien seamen who upon arrival at our ports are found to be afflicted with various diseases often of a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 1925 (FN)

United States Vs. Gulf Refining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-01-1925

..... at places in oklahoma keifer drumright and jenks for transportation to port arthur texas there to be delivered to defendant and that ..... s naphtha produced at defendant s refinery was shipped from port arthur in tank cars to the casinghead gasoline compression plants ..... use of the blended or weathered casinghead gasoline shipped to port arthur did not involve refining properly so called but even .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //