Popularity - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: popularity Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 257 results (0.007 seconds)Popular Packing Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bank of Punjab Ltd.
Court: DRAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-03-2001
..... that the respondent bank granted bill discounting limit to m s popular packing pvt ltd m s rajasthan chemicals and m s alliance ..... clear in my mind that the contractual relationship between m s popular packing pvt ltd m s rajasthan chemicals and m s alliance ..... guarantor consequently the claim applications cannot be stayed against m s popular packing pvt ltd m s rajasthan chemicals and m s alliance .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPopular Cycle Manufacturing Company (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Trad ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-17-2001
Reported in: [2002]128STC652(All)
sudihr narain j 1 hoard learned counsel for the applicant and learned standing counsel 2 the tribunal by the impugned...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPopular Thread Factory Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-14-2001
Reported in: [2001]124STC569(Mad)
orderr jayasimha babu j 1 despite the law having been declared by this court in more than one decision that...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPopular Automobiles Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-07-2001
Reported in: [2003]129STC60(Ker)
c n ramachandran nair j 1 an automobile dealer is the revision petitioner before us the revision is against the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPopular Engineering Co. Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-31-2001
Reported in: (2001)168CTR(P& H)55; [2001]248ITR577(P& H)
g s singhvi j 1 whether the income tax appellate tribunal can while deciding an application under section 254 2...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India Vs. M/S Popular Construction Co.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-05-2001
Reported in: 2001VIIIAD(SC)297; AIR2001SC4010; 2001(6)ALT30(SC); 2001(3)APLJ345; (2002)1CompLJ46(SC); JT2001(8)SC271; 2001(6)SCALE657; (2001)8SCC470; 2002(1)LC4(SC)
ruma pal j 1 leave granted 2 the question which arises for determination in this case is whether the provisions...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH. Nagaraj Vs. State by Lokayukta Police, Belgaum
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-30-2001
Reported in: ILR2002KAR556; 2002(2)KarLJ144
..... law the court has to interpret the word report in its ordinary popular sense consistent with the context viewed from popular sense of the term report particularly in the context in which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmithkline Beecham Consumer Healthcare Gmbhy and ors. Vs. Hindustan Le ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-02-2001
Reported in: (2002)ILLJ453Bom
..... s then advocates dated 10 august 1999 advocates acting for another manufacturer of pepsodent popular toothbrushes unident brushes private limited of 78 suryakiran complex old padra road vadodara 390 ..... the plaintiffs filed a suit in the baroda court against manufacturer of the pepsodent popular toothbrushes namely unident brushes limited to prevent them from using the moulds for manufacturing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrabhakar Shankar Deodhar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secreta ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-05-2001
Reported in: 2002(2)BomCR106
..... on television determines its ability to attract advertisements and hence its revenue generating potential popular tastes being what they are entertainment sells however the objectives of a publicly owned ..... channel such as doordarshan are more fundamental than merely conveying images that appeal to popular taste the private advertiser seeks to air his advertisement on programmes which command the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThree-n-products Pvt. Ltd., 3030, Street No. 4, Ranjit Nagar, New Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2001
Reported in: 95(2002)DLT271
..... the idea is obviously to cash on the goodwill reputation and popularity of the said trade mark even if the trade mark ..... is purely with the idea of exploiting the goodwill reputation and popularity of the plaintiff s trade mark who are in the business ..... has adversely affected the plaintiff s business its goodwill reputation and popularity thus there would be no exact measure to determine the loss .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial