Poor - Judgment Search Results

Perry Vs. Sindermann

Court: US Supreme Court

perry v sindermann 408 u s 593 1972 u s supreme court perry v sindermann 408 u s 593 1972...

Furman Vs. Georgia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... public opposition we are told that the penalty is imposed exclusively on uninfluential minorities the poor and powerless personally ugly and socially unacceptable footnote 8 38 it is urged that ..... upon society as an easy and remunerative way of life moreover the terms underprivileged the poor and the powerless are relative and inexact often conveying subjective connotations which vary widely .....

Papachristou Vs. City of Jacksonville

Court: US Supreme Court

..... home areas in search of improved conditions later vagrancy laws became criminal aspects of the poor laws the series of laws passed in england on the subject became increasingly severe ..... under the vagrancy act 1824 those generally implicated by the imprecise terms of the ordinance poor people nonconformists dissenters idlers may be required to comport themselves according to the lifestyle deemed .....

Argersinger Vs. Hamlin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the law this noble ideal cannot be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without ..... persons charged with misdemeanors see 1 l silverstein defense of the poor in criminal cases in american state courts 127 135 1965 ..... a significant contribution quantitatively and qualitatively to the representation of the poor in many areas including cases reached by today s decision .....

Lindsey Vs. Normet

Court: US Supreme Court

..... discriminates against defendants in fed actions the statute potentially applies to all tenants rich and poor commercial and noncommercial it cannot be faulted for over exclusiveness or under exclusiveness and ..... possession of one s home are fundamental interests which are particularly important to the poor and which may be trenched upon only after the state demonstrates some superior interest .....

Evansville Airport Vs. Delta Airlines, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 242 u s 160 1916 number and capacity of vehicles clark v poor 274 u s 554 1927 mileage within the state interstate busses corp ..... is not a matter of concern to these appellants see clark v poor 274 u s at 274 u s 557 morf v bingaman 298 ..... n 21 while noting the frank legislative purpose to deter migration by the poor and speculating that an indigent who desires to migrate will doubtless hesitate .....

Lachhman and anr. Vs. State

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 1973CriLJ1658

..... the witness it is not disputed that the prosecutrix belongs to a poor class and sfaa cannot be expected to lead profligate life so the ..... general has very emphatically argued that she is a girl of a poor class with no intelligence no education and that even if she was ..... 16 years of age because in the case of girls belonging to poor families these physical developments take place at a late stage hence i .....

Sri Sri Iswar Jagannath Deb Jew and ors. Vs. Fatick Chand Seal and ors ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1972Cal489

..... is a two storied building including temple nat mandir feeding house of the poor charitable dispensary jheel tanks and there is also open low land the ..... 16 per annum mr banerjee pointed out that in this account expenses for poor feeding has been shown to the extent of rs 8 384 86 ..... but expenses for poor feeding can be made under the deed of endowment as also under .....

Jefferson Vs. Hackney

Court: US Supreme Court

..... welfare funds is fixed any increase in benefits paid to the working poor would have to be offset by reductions elsewhere thus if texas ..... not invidious the legislature s efforts to tackle the problems of the poor and the needy are not subject to a constitutional straitjacket the very ..... in light of the fact that chicanos in texas fare even more poorly than the blacks see l grebler j moore r guzman the .....

Hadley Vs. Alabama

Court: US Supreme Court

..... process of law under our constitution apply to the rich as well as to the poor to whites as well as to the minorities footnote 1 in alabama a certified transcript ..... way as to discriminate between those appellants based who are wealthy and those who are poor griffin v illinois 351 u s 12 18 1955 alabama s law seems to be .....